On 02/20/13 21:08, andrew clarke wrote:
On Wed 2013-02-20 17:45:52 UTC-0800, Darren Pilgrim
(list_free...@bluerosetech.com) wrote:
Reading the pkgng page on the wiki:
As a consequence of the security incident on 11th November 2012, for
the time being pre-compiled packages for pkgng are not
Hello.
# uname -a
FreeBSD xx.x 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #2: Sat Dec 1
14:43:22 CET 2012 root@xx.x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/XX i386
portupgrade -R firefox
...
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Smeets wrote:
Jan committed a patch that should work, is that an acceptable
workaround for your use case (it pulls in a newer gcc)? Can you
test it and report back?
Yes, it works correctly, thanks.
- --
Alex Dupre
-BEGIN PGP
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
clang colours corrupt script() output, e.g.:
#warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. \
^[[0;1;32m ^
^[[0m1 warning generated.
^[[31m^[[1mLinking CXX executable ../../../bin/pvbatch
^[[0m[ 91%] Built target pvbatch-real
Can I use something like this
CFLAGS+=
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:49:30 + Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
clang colours corrupt script() output, e.g.:
#warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. \
^[[0;1;32m ^
^[[0m1 warning generated.
^[[31m^[[1mLinking CXX executable ../../../bin/pvbatch
^[[0m[ 91%]
On 18/02/2013 12:46, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
package works great (and far faster than openoffice) but still i would find
quickstarter functionality that is available in windows openoffice useful.
You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
just the same time it made your
Hi.
I'm looking for users of grub2, who could test (and may be maintain)
sysutils/grub2 port. Please, write me.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 2013-02-20 19:08, andrew clarke wrote:
On Wed 2013-02-20 17:45:52 UTC-0800, Darren Pilgrim
(list_free...@bluerosetech.com) wrote:
Reading the pkgng page on the wiki:
As a consequence of the security incident on 11th November 2012, for
the time being pre-compiled packages for pkgng are not
I am getting this on 2 machines, both at 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0
r247001. Both have GENERIC kernel, no edits. Both have the linux module
loaded if that matters.
First machine dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991,
On 21.02.13 20:34, Frank Seltzer wrote:
I am getting this on 2 machines, both at 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0
r247001. Both have GENERIC kernel, no edits. Both have the linux module
loaded if that matters.
Can you apply this patch
You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
just the same time it made your system start take longer.
true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice
the waiting time.
Quick starters are a huge part of the reason windows installations
start to
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Florian Smeets f...@smeets.im wrote:
On 21.02.13 20:34, Frank Seltzer wrote:
I am getting this on 2 machines, both at 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0
r247001. Both have GENERIC kernel, no edits. Both have the linux module
loaded if that matters.
Can
On 21/02/2013 20:54, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
just the same time it made your system start take longer.
true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice the
waiting time.
That's strange. As long as
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:54:59 +0100 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
just the same time it made your system start take longer.
true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice
the waiting time.
Quick
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? Ive had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6
installed
2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? Ive had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
the one from addons.mozilla.org but I
On 22/02/2013 12:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? Ive had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
the one from addons.mozilla.org
I'm currently unable to build gettext from ports (tried both `portmaster
devel/gettext` and `cd /usr/ports/devel/gettext ; make install`). I've
searched around the forums, mailing list archives, and google to
determine what I'm doing wrong, but have had no luck so far in finding a
solution.
I
On 02/21/13 19:47, John Marshall wrote:
On 22/02/2013 12:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? Ive had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting
On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? Ive had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to
On 22/02/2013 13:33, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 02/21/13 19:47, John Marshall wrote:
On 22/02/2013 12:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? Ive had it not selected
for two updates
On 02/21/13 21:07, John Marshall wrote:
On 22/02/2013 13:33, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 02/21/13 19:47, John Marshall wrote:
On 22/02/2013 12:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected?
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:36:45 -0600
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr jnagyjr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building
with mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? Ive
I've been having issues compiling editors/openoffice-3 for several weeks
and I'm not sure where the problem is cropping up.
# less /etc/make.conf
WITH_PKGNG=yes
# added by use.perl 2012-12-11 17:43:33
PERL_VERSION=5.16.2
#Add in clang after rebuilding world
WITH_CLANG=YES
CXX=clang++
On 22/02/2013 14:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Ports enigmail has been updated? My complaint with the former ports
enigmail was it kept crashing Thunderbird.
There is no Enigmail port. It disappeared back in October 2012.
If you have removed all traces of Enigmail packages on your system, and
On 02/21/13 21:17, John Marshall wrote:
On 22/02/2013 14:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Ports enigmail has been updated? My complaint with the former ports
enigmail was it kept crashing Thunderbird.
There is no Enigmail port. It disappeared back in October 2012.
It's still pulled in by the
On 02/21/13 21:07, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:36:45 -0600
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr jnagyjr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building
with
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:15:30 -0600
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr jnagyjr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/21/13 21:07, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:36:45 -0600
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr jnagyjr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 02/21/13 21:28, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:15:30 -0600
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr jnagyjr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/21/13 21:07, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:36:45 -0600
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr jnagyjr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-22 03:36, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? Ive had it not selected
for two updates now and
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:12:11 +
Thomas Abthorpe portmgr-secret...@freebsd.org wrote:
Mark Linimon, aka linimon@, recently stepped down from his duties on
the FreeBSD Ports Management Team.
Mark joined the team back in 2004, providing nine years of continuity
to the Ports Infrastructure.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:50:07 +0100
Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
2013-02-22 03:36, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building
with
35 matches
Mail list logo
