Yes, probably it would be better.
Please, inform me about the news as I'm _really_ waiting for the working
version of Enlightenment.
Peter
On 25/12/2013 08:24, arrowdodger wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Peter pe...@reseaunance.com
mailto:pe...@reseaunance.com wrote:
On 12/25/2013 11:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
I have used Matthew's p5-FreeBSD-Portindex for several years. In the
past it was a very valuable tool that allowed me to keep an INDEX up to
date relative to changes in the ports tree in seconds or minutes,
instead of having to do 'make index' every
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on
purpose.
On 12/25/2013 11:40 PM, clutton wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 22:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
The problem is that the bash.1 and bashbugs.1 man pages do
Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us schrieb:
I saw the DEPRECATED notice for my old faithful bdb 4.7, and read the
UPDATING entry related to the pending bdb purge. My first thought was
That's a total waste of effort, with likely disastrous consequences.
I'm all for removing broken/unused ports.
On 26/12/2013 07:30, Doug Barton wrote:
Speaking of p5-FreeBSD-Portindex generally, I'm wondering what Matthew's
plans are for it? For some time now running 'cache-update -f
svn-up,options' has caused errors related to WARNING unknown options
file that seem to have to do with the recent
On 12/26/2013 12:41 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
I disagree on the assessments of efforts here. I checked the docs,
and the actual .db files are supposed to be compatible,
Sure, they are, to some extent, SUPPOSED to be compatible. Experience
tells us that is not the case.
excepting the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/26/2013 12:54 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
| I'll be happy to fix any problems reported to me, but I need to see
| reports of problems. Yours is the first mention I've seen of the
| problems you mention. Now I know about it, a fix will be
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on
purpose.
On 12/25/2013 11:40 PM, clutton wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 22:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
The
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote:
Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means
chaos. More variants means more complication.
if options for nls mean no || WITHOUT_NLS; then
This is not chaos.
On 2013-12-26 11:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote:
Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means
chaos. More variants means more complication.
if options for nls mean no
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:28:01AM +0100, olli hauer wrote:
On 2013-12-26 11:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote:
Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means
chaos.
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 11:52 +0200, clutton wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on
purpose.
On 12/25/2013 11:40 PM, clutton wrote:
On
On 26/12/2013 10:40, clutton wrote:
The whole port because of STATIC option?
It'll be better to move this thing to bash port and make it as an
option. Like zsh maintainer did.
It's already an option in the bash port.
You seem somewhat unclear on the concept of slave ports and why they
should
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:40:43PM +0200, clutton wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 11:52 +0200, clutton wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:51 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 26/12/2013 10:40, clutton wrote:
The whole port because of STATIC option?
It'll be better to move this thing to bash port and make it as an
option. Like zsh maintainer did.
It's already an option in the bash port.
You seem
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 01:27:42PM +0200, clutton wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:51 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 26/12/2013 10:40, clutton wrote:
The whole port because of STATIC option?
It'll be better to move this thing to bash port and make it as an
option. Like zsh maintainer
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:14:55 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
Jerry je...@seibercom.net schrieb:
The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has
been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest
version will make it into the ports system soon?
Careful
On 12/26/2013 12:54, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:14:55 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
Jerry je...@seibercom.net schrieb:
The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has
been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest
version will make it into
clutton clut...@zoho.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 11:52 +0200, clutton wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the
maintainer on purpose.
On
On both 9-stable and 10-stable
Dec 26 13:02:04 lokschuppen ntpd[5270]: ntpd 4.2.7p364@1.2483-o Thu Dec 26
12:55:22 UTC 2013 (1): Starting
Dec 26 13:02:04 lokschuppen ntpd[5270]: Command line: /usr/local/sbin/ntpd -c
/etc/ntp.conf -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
Dec 26 13:02:05
Hi,
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:33:10 +1100
Dewayne Geraghty dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au said:
dewayne Would it be possible to include some documentation in
dewayne /usr/ports/UPDATING regarding the removal of gssapi from cyrus-sasl2
and
dewayne the creation of the
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 23:23:09 -0500
Erick Turnquist jhujh...@adjectivism.org said:
jhujhiti Thank you! I noticed a typo in the new Makefile for
jhujhiti cyrus-sasl2-gssapi. On line 60, MIT_LIB_DEPENDS is set to
jhujhiti libkrb5support.0 instead of libkrb5support.so.0. Once I fixed this, I
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote:
Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means
chaos. More variants means more complication.
if options for nls mean
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:18:57AM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote:
Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:18:57AM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote:
Sorry, but I have a quite opposite
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:27:34 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:18:57AM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug
Jerry je...@seibercom.net schrieb:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:14:55 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
Jerry je...@seibercom.net schrieb:
The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has
been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest
version will make it into
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote:
Adding a (shortened, so easy to type) URL pointing to the wiki or
whatever resource describing why this happened could be useful (not just
for this, but for all of these deprecation warnings, so users
understand the
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:30:07 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
I meant deliberate changes in concepts, not just happenstances...
Check what Fedora and other Linux distros have been doing to work
around those before you complain.
And remember this is a volunteer project, you are not paying to
Make knotd startup script work again.
From the PR:
When submitting PR 183682 I was unaware the patch as in PR 182792 wasn't
committed yet. So to my amazing I just noticed the startup problem still
exists.
Enclosed patch is basicly the same as the uncommited one, but besides the
removal
26.12.2013 22:29, Jerry пишет:
All I asked was if an updated version of CUPS was planned to be
introduced into the ports system.
I run 1.7.0 at my system for two weeks. However there are some
problems I'm working on. Sorry, no time estimation for now.
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:03:48PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
26.12.2013 22:29, Jerry пишет:
All I asked was if an updated version of CUPS was planned to be
introduced into the ports system.
I run 1.7.0 at my system for two weeks. However there are some
problems I'm working on.
Hello.
Since some time I cannot build sysutil/synergy-devel anymore.
The box is 9.1/i386 and all dependencies are up to date.
Although this is not a big or urgent problem to me, I though I'd let you
know.
Below is the full build log.
If you want me to test anything, just tell.
Thanks for
On 26/12/2013 08:34, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/25/2013 11:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
I have used Matthew's p5-FreeBSD-Portindex for several years. In the
past it was a very valuable tool that allowed me to keep an INDEX up to
date relative to changes in the ports tree in seconds or minutes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/26/2013 02:55 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Thank you.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSvLvUAAoJEFzGhvEaGryES3MIAM7YTPgDnWy/BmNEM3Ctw/Ls
py-pyxmpp 1.1.2_yes is not a valid port name.
portsdb error Not in due form: 'version[_revision][,epoc]'.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
36 matches
Mail list logo
