On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
(maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that
makes this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.)
github itself is closed source, but 95% of its functionality is based on
git which is open. One only needs to invoke 3-4
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
(maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that makes
this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.)
github itself is closed source, but 95% of its functionality
Hello, Boris.
You wrote 24 января 2014 г., 20:33:45:
I'm writing port, which has complex, multi-stage build. In the middle ofg
build some files should be installed into some directory with exactly same
structure, as final result -- some ${TEMPROOT}/${PREFIX}. I could create
special place
On 1/24/14, 11:45 PM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you
really want to do clean out and triage the all PRs on an ongoing basis,
my guess is that would be very welcome and we'd figure out a way
On 1/25/14, 12:11 AM, Yuri wrote:
On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
(maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that
makes this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.)
github itself is closed source, but 95% of its functionality is based
on git which is
On 1/25/2014 09:55, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/24/14, 11:45 PM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you
really want to do clean out and triage the all PRs on an ongoing basis,
my guess is that
25.01.2014 12:33, Lev Serebryakov пишет:
Hello, Boris.
You wrote 24 января 2014 г., 20:33:45:
I'm writing port, which has complex, multi-stage build. In the middle ofg
build some files should be installed into some directory with exactly same
structure, as final result -- some
Hello, Boris.
You wrote 25 января 2014 г., 14:06:12:
How this contradict with putting file to ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX} before
stage phase (I don't like word stage instead of phase here due to
obvious reason)?
BS To my mind build is, well, for building and install... you know...
Yep, but here I
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:47 AM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.stwrote:
On 1/25/2014 01:36, Big Lebowski wrote:
I was hoping to get some discussion revealing how the work is organized
around ports PR, perhaps some ideas on improving them and I hoped that
people who can make decisions
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 1/24/14, 11:45 PM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you
really want to do clean out and triage the all PRs on an
On 25/01/2014 10:35, Big Lebowski wrote:
Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you
really want to do clean out and triage the all PRs on an ongoing basis,
my guess is that would be very welcome and we'd figure out a way to set
that up. It would definitely
Am 25.01.2014 02:12 schrieb Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com:
I think you've got me wrong - I am following freebsd-virtualization list
very closely, and the matter I've touched here is not my doubt on which
technology I should use, but rather a complaint on the state of jails
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich de...@bluelife.atwrote:
Am 25.01.2014 02:12 schrieb Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com:
I think you've got me wrong - I am following freebsd-virtualization
list
very closely, and the matter I've touched here is not my doubt on
Am 25.01.2014 13:35 schrieb Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich de...@bluelife.at
wrote:
Am 25.01.2014 02:12 schrieb Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com:
I think you've got me wrong - I am following freebsd-virtualization
Good news! Can I help something?
Zsolt
2014-01-24 Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:50:38 +0100 Zsolt Udvari wrote:
Hi list!
I'm using www/newsbeuter to read my rss-feeds but after upgrade 9.2 to
10.0 it doesn't start.
Starting newsbeuter 2.8...
Loading
- add license
- Support stage
PR: ports/186069
Submitted by: Tatsuki Makino
-
Build ID: 20140125163200-34244
Job owner: m...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 6 minutes
Enddate: Sat,
On 1/25/14, 1:14 AM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 09:55, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/24/14, 11:45 PM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you
really want to do clean out and triage the all PRs
On 1/25/2014 18:11, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Still missing the point. Git can sit on top of svn.
Other than converting SVN to Git, I don't know anything about that. It
would never be done in an official capacity. Git is not an official
tool of FreeBSD.
From what I'm reading you may know
By the way, this wasn't about switching to git (although that would be
nice), this is about leveraging existing tools.
One can very easily use git-svn bridge to push git changes into
subversion. Or you can try to re-implement a patch queue based system
yourself using a bunch of duct tape and
On 1/25/14, 9:28 AM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 18:11, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Still missing the point. Git can sit on top of svn.
Other than converting SVN to Git, I don't know anything about that. It
would never be done in an official capacity. Git is not an official
tool of
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:16:39PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/24/14, 4:47 PM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 01:36, Big Lebowski wrote:
I was hoping to get some discussion revealing how the work is organized
around ports PR, perhaps some ideas on improving them and I hoped that
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:57:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 12:11 AM, Yuri wrote:
On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
(maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that
makes this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.)
github itself
Making proper merge from github pull request it not that easy, you will
need to
fetch pull request as custom branches and cherry-pick them. That is really
not
convenient.
devel/tailor was designed specifically for this case (the actual case it
does is aegis --- svn) but same basic idea
--
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?
To: John Marino dragonfly...@marino.st
You are solving the wrong problem.
And nobody is reinventing
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:11:24AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 1:14 AM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 09:55, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/24/14, 11:45 PM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:36:00AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 9:28 AM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 18:11, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Still missing the point. Git can sit on top of svn.
Other than converting SVN to Git, I don't know anything about that. It
would
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:53:41PM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Making proper merge from github pull request it not that easy, you will
need to
fetch pull request as custom branches and cherry-pick them. That is really
not
convenient.
devel/tailor was designed specifically for this
On 1/25/14 9:48 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:16:39PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
To me it would speak of tooling as opposed to anything.
Does the ports system have a 1 or 2 click interface for merging PRs like
for instance github?
Could ports take PRs in the
On 1/25/14 9:51 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:57:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 12:11 AM, Yuri wrote:
On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
(maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that
makes this all as easy github, but
On 1/25/14 10:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:36:00AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 9:28 AM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 18:11, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Still missing the point. Git can sit on top of svn.
Other than converting SVN to Git, I don't
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:25:07AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 9:48 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:16:39PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
To me it would speak of tooling as opposed to anything.
Does the ports system have a 1 or 2 click interface
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:27:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:36:00AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 9:28 AM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 18:11, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Still missing the point.
On 1/25/14 10:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:27:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:36:00AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 9:28 AM, John Marino wrote:
On 1/25/2014 18:11, Alfred
On 1/25/14 10:30 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:25:07AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 9:48 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:16:39PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
To me it would speak of tooling as opposed to anything.
Does the
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:41:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:27:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:36:00AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:41:51AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:30 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:25:07AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 9:48 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:16:39PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:59 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:41:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:27:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25,
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:06:33AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:59 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:41:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 10:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:27:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:26:30AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 9:51 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:57:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 12:11 AM, Yuri wrote:
On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
(maybe there is some great ports
On 1/25/14 11:52 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:26:30AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 9:51 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:57:21AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14, 12:11 AM, Yuri wrote:
On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred
On 01/24/2014 05:30 PM, Big Lebowski wrote:
Hi everyone,
I wanted to ask about the growing time of reaction to ports PR's - what is
the problem? It seems to me, as a ports contributor, that this time is only
growing, not shrinking, and there's no formal/automated procedures that
would help
Alfred Perlstein wrote on 25.01.2014 22:41:
Are any of these tools available on the other side?
Ie, for port submitters?
yes porttools for example, or some scripts inside Tools/scripts
regards,
Bapt
Is there a primer on using these tools?
/usr/ports/Tools/scripts/getpatch category/PR
--
On 01/25/2014 05:43, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
With the scripts it should be possible to fetch the patch of a PR, apply
and commit it to your redports repository and do additional changes until
you are okay with it. What is still missing is a script that helps
committing the changes to the
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 05:43, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
With the scripts it should be possible to fetch the patch of a PR, apply
and commit it to your redports repository and do additional changes until
you are okay with it. What is still
Remove non existing PORTDOCS
Support stage
-
Build ID: 20140125224200-33223
Job owner: b...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 50 minutes
Enddate: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 23:32:16 GMT
Revision:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really want
to do (get new ports into the system)... to that end automating everything
that can be automated is sure help free up comitter time so they can look
at what is interesting
Yes.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really want
to do (get new ports into the system)... to that end automating everything
that can be automated is sure help free
On 01/25/2014 15:48, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Git hup (or*ANY* remote service for that matter) is a no go IMO
But both Debian and Fedora do this with automated remote testing, and
they don't seem to complain.
How is our ports different in this respect?
Yuri
On 1/25/14 4:05 PM, Yuri wrote:
On 01/25/2014 15:48, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Git hup (or*ANY* remote service for that matter) is a no go IMO
But both Debian and Fedora do this with automated remote testing, and
they don't seem to complain.
How is our ports different in this respect?
I
On 1/25/14 3:41 PM, Yuri wrote:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really
want
to do (get new ports into the system)... to that end automating
everything
that can be automated is sure help free up comitter time so they can
On 1/25/14 3:48 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really want
to do (get new ports into the system)... to that end automating
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 1/25/14 3:48 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really
I'm curious, is INDEX bounded to svn revision somehow now?
Or is it builds every hour like in old days?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
All PHP 5.5.8 extension ports are failing with:
#!-!#
=== Staging for php55-bz2-5.5.8
=== Generating temporary packing list
install:
/var/ports/basejail/usr/ports/archivers/php55-bz2/work/php-5.5.8/ext/bz2/modules/bz2.so:
No such file or
I never said our selves it is outsourced to the developer/maintainer with
100% automated stuff... once I am doing with the next small version of
petitecloud I will post the 6 line script we use to test the port
(including cranking up a few vm's)... have fun doing that anywhere else
Got bored
Hello,
On 1/25/14, 9:04 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 3:48 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really
want
to do (get new
I like the KISS approach myself. This can be boiled down to those two
issues, one of which is a symptom of the other. Arguing and debating over a
long term solution to the OP's question does nothing to solve the problem
in the short to intermediate term. There are 1680 current ports related
Hello,
On 1/25/14, 10:33 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I like the KISS approach myself. This can be boiled down to those
two issues, one of which is a symptom of the other. Arguing and
debating over a long term solution to the OP's question does nothing
to solve the problem in the
59 matches
Mail list logo
