First:
With most of the move to git, portlint complains about a missing
#$FreeBSD line, and one of the missing features of git is that it just
doesn't support the usual tagging that cvs and svn gave us. Is this still
a useful requirement?
(For us, where we have rc scripts that will never be
All,
Mentor support requested. I am the maintainer of OpenDMARC, but haven't
done much with the port since being handed it, mainly because development
on opendmarc seemed to be stalled.
There's a new version of OpenDMARC out, version 1.4.0 (needed a few
patches from the github-released
All,
There's a port of the current version of racadm (utility for Dell iDracs).
It's extracted from the binary-only RPM that dell distributes.
While I've got pi working on the actual merging of the port, I'd love to
have people test it out. It works on modern-ish dell machiens,
effectively
I see it on the ports wanted page, but don't see a bug to add a port.
If not, I can start it (I have opendmarc, they're similar in structure,
albeit now on Github).
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:15 PM Hiroo Ono wrote:
On 2021年3月4日木曜日 9時00分32秒 JST, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I'm trying to update a port I maintain. Since I last updated, it moved
from
ISC to github and it uses unusual naming conventions.
The distfile is
Hey all,
I'm attempting to port racadm (this has been on and off work for a while
now, but apparently easily deploying SSL certs on a faraway server pretty
much *requires* this tool. (Can't do it with the web UI, can't do it over
SSH).
This has been ongoing for a while in
All,
Is anyone working on a mailman 3 port?
(I'm guessing it would be several ports, actually, as mailman 3 is several
different moving parts).
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Saturday, 6 February 2021 00:56:58 CST bob prohaska wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:00:36PM -0600, Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports wrote:
I think that means >= 9.16.3. But 9.16.3 is pretty old by now, and many other
bugs have
All,
Dayjob's deploy scripts were burned in production by
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252339
It seems pragmatic to fix this and add rubygem-ruby-augeas back to the
dependencies. Puppet without augeas is pretty much a non-starter.
Would the one-line patch help?
-Dan
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020, Ronald Klop wrote:
Some questions below.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:12:02 +0100, Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
wrote:
Hey there,
At the day job we've been using mail/dma port for a number of years now,
and the rollout and config of files
Hey there all.
This is a "don't try this at home" question. This is not something I'm
asking how to do in the general case, but I'd like to know.
It seems recently (since 1.1.1, OpenSSL has deprecated a number of
ciphers, and made them a compile-time default disable.)
WHat this means is
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:12:02 +0100, Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
wrote:
Hey there,
At the day job we've been using mail/dma port for a number of years now,
and the rollout and config of files in /usr/local/etc/dma is part of our
deploy process.
It only
Hey there,
At the day job we've been using mail/dma port for a number of years now,
and the rollout and config of files in /usr/local/etc/dma is part of our
deploy process.
It only recently occurred to us that there was a "dma" in base since
probably 11.0 (whomever wrote the release notes
Hey all,
I'm a port maintainer for a single port, and the Bugzilla is complaining
to me about an open report.
(https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246829)
I'm not a committer, and also don't have any ability to change the state
of the bug other than commenting on it, but this
All,
Rancid3 has been updated to 3.9, upstream. I've contacted the maintainer,
but it might be stuck. Would a patch be helpful?
-Dan Mahoney
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site:
All,
I'm requesting takeover of a couple of FreeBSD ports (cvs and dma,
although dma is now in base, I imagine the port will be used to track
upstream changes before they make it into base).
What has been requested thusfar is a diff to update maintainer. Seems
simple enough, right,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.1 has been added to ports tree. AFAIK OpenSSL 1.1.1 supports
TLSv1.3
but no port options for TLSv1.3. There're only TLS1, TLS1_1, TLS1_2.
I assume TLSv1.3 will be enabled by default unless disabled explicitly so
security/openssl111
1) Got the version wrong. I'm on 10.4.
2) Forgot a subject. Whoops.
3) Forgot to cc maintainer. Doh!
-Dan
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
Hey all,
Funny question. I'm on FreeBSD 11.4, and would like to use the latest
version of NTP, which is in pkg.
The version
Hey all,
Funny question. I'm on FreeBSD 11.4, and would like to use the latest
version of NTP, which is in pkg.
The version in pkg doesn't have a startup script, which I'm not sure is
supposed to be the case. I know for things like BIND (when it was both
in base and in ports) you could
Hey all,
This may be off topic, but does anyone know a port or configuration for
FreeBSD that can listen on a serial port and spit out a PDF? I have a
piece of hardware (a hospital-grade pulse oximeter) that's able to talk to
an *original* HP Thinkjet with a serial port and produce graphical
On Thu, 24 May 2018, Pete Wright wrote:
On 05/24/2018 02:46, Johannes Lundberg wrote:
If you need to re-show message of any installed package, "pkg info -D"
(or pkg info --pkg-message) is your friend. Nothing is lost. You can
view it anytime.
If you're in virtualbox on a laptop, you
On Mon, 21 May 2018, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 04:49:34PM -0700, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2018, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
On 05/20/18 21:15, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
21.05.2018 2:02, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
OK, I'll try to explain a bit more.
Firstly
On Sun, 20 May 2018, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
On 05/20/18 21:15, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
21.05.2018 2:02, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
OK, I'll try to explain a bit more.
Firstly, this port is PHP code and needs no compilation, so they are
both source files. NO_BUILD= yes
www/wordpress
All,
This port is pretty much useless as a dependency, since Google has now
deprecated the v1 captcha (which is all this code can do).
It's been fixed here: https://github.com/redhat-infosec/python-recaptcha
(I.e. the module name this code generates uses the same import name, but
any
All,
Apologies if this is the wrong ML for this -- the ports list seemed the
right one since in my buildworld, it's only the "packages" functionality
that seems broken:
Any ideas?
root@poudriere:/usr/src # make packages
make[1]: "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1" line 1517: Unassociated shell command
All,
Slightly off topic, but as the poudriere experts are in this list, I think
it's poignant.
Is there a way to leverage my Poudriere Jails to build pkgbase repos? For
example, to build different packages for amd64 and i386, or to build
distinct packages against -stable, and -release?
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, blubee blubeeme wrote:
I agree with this as well, why maintain these ports when they're being
maintained upstream. Plus, if we do need patches, they can be applied
during the build step.
maybe with the ability to add some patches on the way through.. There is
just too
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Mark Felder wrote:
Would you like us to delete our port of it now? I can arrange for that if
you insist on not having proper ports of your software. At this point it
might be easier to just add a clause to your license that
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This is down to a deficiency in pkg(8) -- it can't handle having a
number of alternate packages or ranges of different package versions to
fulfil a dependency. The dependencies "baked into" each package are on
exactly the dependency package and version
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, Zach Leslie wrote:
On Feb 5, 2018 5:51 PM, "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <free...@gushi.org> wrote:
All,
I've lost the better part of an afternoon to this issue. These questions
are not just specific to the above ports, but also as to how ports
All,
I've lost the better part of an afternoon to this issue. These questions
are not just specific to the above ports, but also as to how ports are
best built in general.
BACKGROUND:
The puppet ports require rubygem-facter. There's a knob in the port that
lets you switch to
31 matches
Mail list logo
