On 9/15/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:25:14AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:22:15AM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote:
Hi all,
Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a
strange problem. It's probably
Hi all,
Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a
strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be
appreciated.
Three of the ports I maintain have decided that the man pages belong in
${PREFIX}/share/man/man(n). Now, reading the Porter's
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:22:15AM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote:
Hi all,
Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a
strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be
appreciated.
Three of the ports I maintain have decided that the man pages
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:25:14AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:22:15AM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote:
Hi all,
Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a
strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be
appreciated.
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:22:15 +0100
Matt Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Hi all,
Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a
strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be
appreciated.
It's probably happened because of recent
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:22:15 +0100
Matt Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Hi all,
Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a
strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be
appreciated.
It's probably
