Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-26 Thread Randy Pratt
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:25:05 +0300 Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy Pratt wrote: Unfortunately I can't reproduce it. Can you show an output of the command please: cd /usr/ports/multimedia/kino; make package-depends-list (doesn't this ignore any entries in

Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-26 Thread Randy Pratt
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:15:18 +0300 Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it should be fixed in 2.2.5 version. Yes, it certainly seems so. It may be a bit premature without further testing but it works as I have come to expect portupgrade to work. Just after I updated this

Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-25 Thread Randy Pratt
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:36:19 +0300 Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Randy Pratt wrote: There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles dependencies in updating a port to a new version. In quite a few cases, portupgrade does not

Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-25 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Randy Pratt wrote: Before starting, I had no DELETED comments in /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS. After following the above steps, I checked for DELETED comments: ImageMagick-6.3.2.0_1/+CONTENTS:@comment DELETED:pkgdep ghostscript-afpl-8.54,1 ImageMagick-6.3.2.0_1/+CONTENTS:@comment

Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-25 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: # grep mplayer /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/* /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@pkgdep mplayer-skins-1.1.2_6 /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@comment DEPORIGIN:multimedia/mplayer-skins /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@comment DELETED:pkgdep mplayer-0.99.10_4

Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-25 Thread Randy Pratt
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:51:48 +0300 Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sergey Matveychuk wrote: # grep mplayer /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/* /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@pkgdep mplayer-skins-1.1.2_6 /var/db/pkg/kino-0.9.5/+CONTENTS:@comment DEPORIGIN:multimedia/mplayer-skins

Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-23 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Randy Pratt wrote: There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles dependencies in updating a port to a new version. In quite a few cases, portupgrade does not restore all dependencies that were originally listed in the +REQUIRED_BY file. I'll use

Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-05 Thread w45kl9
I have observed this behavior also, and agree that portupgrade seems to have a bug. On 20-Jan-2007 I installed 6.2-RELEASE on an empty hard disk partition with ports skeletons. Using make under /usr/ports I built some 340 ports over a 2 day span. Six days later I cvsup'd the latest ports

Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-05 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:11:14 -0500 Randy Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles dependencies in updating a port to a new version. In quite a few cases, portupgrade does not restore all dependencies that were originally listed in the

Portupgrade omitting dependencies?

2007-02-04 Thread Randy Pratt
There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles dependencies in updating a port to a new version. In quite a few cases, portupgrade does not restore all dependencies that were originally listed in the +REQUIRED_BY file. I'll use the netpbm as an example: Before updating