Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

On 2020-Apr-29, at 10:22, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:50:36 +0200 > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:36:01 -0700 >> Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> [Build successes for building via poudriere-devel. >>> Message history removed.] >>> >>> Based on (some

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

[Build successes for building via poudriere-devel. Message history removed.] Based on (some whitespace details might not survive): # svnlite diff /usr/ports/devel/aarch64-none-elf-gcc/ Index: /usr/ports/devel/aarch64-none-elf-gcc/Makefile

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

[Looks like more than objdump may be involved for /usr/local/aarch64-none-elf/bin/ use.] On 2020-Apr-28, at 14:00, Mark Millard wrote: > [Found a cause of the poudiere vs. not distinction.] > > On 2020-Apr-28, at 13:01, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> On 2020-Apr-28, at 09:23, Mark Millard wrote:

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

[Found a cause of the poudiere vs. not distinction.] On 2020-Apr-28, at 13:01, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2020-Apr-28, at 09:23, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2020-Apr-28, at 07:39, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:14:47 -0700 >>> Mark Millard wrote: >>> On

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

On 2020-Apr-28, at 09:23, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Apr-28, at 07:39, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > >> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:14:47 -0700 >> Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> On 2020-Apr-27, at 17:15, Mark Millard wrote: >>> On 2020-Apr-27, at 11:46, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Mon,

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

On 2020-Apr-28, at 07:39, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:14:47 -0700 > Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2020-Apr-27, at 17:15, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> On 2020-Apr-27, at 11:46, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:32:46 +0200 Emmanuel Vadot wrote:

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

On 2020-Apr-27, at 17:15, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Apr-27, at 11:46, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > >> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:32:46 +0200 >> Emmanuel Vadot wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:13:46 -0700 >>> Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >>> On 2020-Apr-26, at 01:14,

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

On 2020-Apr-27, at 11:46, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:32:46 +0200 > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:13:46 -0700 >> Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 2020-Apr-26, at 01:14, Mark Millard wrote: >>> The below where based on

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

On 2020-Apr-26, at 01:14, Mark Millard wrote: > The below where based on poudriere-devel based build attempts. > /usr/ports/ was based on head -r532972 and aarch64 FreeBSD was > based on head -r360311 . amd64 FreeBSD did not have the build > problem for the aaarch64-targeted u-boot ports. >