on 02/06/2007 10:41 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... nothing happens ...
$ portupgrade -f -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... portaudio-18.1_2 from audio
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/06/2007 10:41 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... nothing happens ...
$ portupgrade -f -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... portaudio
on 04/06/2007 18:26 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/06/2007 10:41 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... nothing happens
Andriy Gapon wrote:
I have a strange problem with portupgrade -o using
portupgrade-devel-2.3.0_5. I didn't have such problem with non-devel
portupgrade and in fact that's how I switched to the -devel version.
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2
I have a strange problem with portupgrade -o using
portupgrade-devel-2.3.0_5. I didn't have such problem with non-devel
portupgrade and in fact that's how I switched to the -devel version.
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... nothing
Andriy Gapon wrote, On 29.5.2007 18:30:
I have a strange problem with portupgrade -o using
portupgrade-devel-2.3.0_5. I didn't have such problem with non-devel
portupgrade and in fact that's how I switched to the -devel version.
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Coleman Kane wrote:
On 2/28/07, Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Give me a few weeks, and if I can band together with a few people I
wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Give me a few weeks, and if I can band together with a few people I
wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related tools to
C++ (and maybe do some code tweaks along the way). Most of the ruby
files are over 400
Quoting Craig Boston [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Thu, 15 Feb 2007
20:25:00 -0600):
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:30:29PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
Enable the virtual channel support (see output of sysctl -a | grep
vchans) and the kernel will automatically mix multiple sound streams
into one, and
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Give me a few weeks, and if I can band together with a few people I
wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related tools to
C++ (and maybe do some code tweaks along the way). Most of the ruby
files are over 400 lines long, sparsely
2007. February 15. 19.17 dátummal [EMAIL PROTECTED] ezt írta:
Compare that to the situation for Debian apt-get. The names are
conserved. They have strict rules about package naming, they stick to
them and don't change them arbitrarily. All packages exist in compiled
form, you don't have
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:17:00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
=
Pros:
=
-It's written in python (portable).
Isn't our more portable for hardware than Python? Also, it is smaller?
-It's a system which focuses on ports compilation from source, not
binary package installation.
David Gilbert wrote:
Jeremy == Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeremy Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try.
I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported
ports installed.
What do you mean by no longer supported?
I want to run portmaster -a, but when it
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:54:29 -0600, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gilbert wrote:
Jeremy == Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeremy Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try.
I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported
ports installed.
What do you mean
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:17:00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
=
Pros:
=
-It's written in python (portable).
Isn't our more portable for hardware than Python? Also, it is smaller?
-It's a system which focuses on ports compilation from
On Thu, February 15, 2007 4:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
I just want to help make a great system even better--that's all; the
only parts of the system I can possibly thinking of improving that
also align with my interests are the ports system and
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 04:32:00PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want to help make a great system even better--that's all; the only
parts of the system I can possibly thinking of improving that also align
with my interests are the ports system and sound system (daemonizing it
like
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:30:29PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
Enable the virtual channel support (see output of sysctl -a | grep
vchans) and the kernel will automatically mix multiple sound streams
into one, and auto-assign programs to the different /dev/dsp0.*
devices as needed. Much nicer
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Craig Boston wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:30:29PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
Enable the virtual channel support (see output of sysctl -a | grep
vchans) and the kernel will automatically mix multiple sound streams
into one, and auto-assign programs to the different
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:17:00 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't trying to port the pkg_* and port* utils to C++ thinking
that I would magically get more optimized code. Sure, C++ is much
better than ruby at optimizations if done correctly, but C++ is also
easier to screw up than
20 matches
Mail list logo
