Re: Using pkg in documentation

2020-04-27 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 08:23:09AM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 2020-04-26 21:37, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: > > What is the way of mentioning about installing a py-package in > > documentation? Let’s say now the default version of python is 3.7 so in > > most of the cases we can write

Re: Using pkg in documentation

2020-04-27 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 2020-04-27 09:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 08:23:09AM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: On 2020-04-26 21:37, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: What is the way of mentioning about installing a py-package in documentation? Let’s say now the default version of python is 3.7

Re: Using pkg in documentation

2020-04-27 Thread Muhammad Moinur Rahman
> On 27 Apr, 2020, at 05:54, Samy Mahmoudi wrote: > > Hi, > > What about using the meta-port lang/python ? You could write something like > the following lines in your documentation: > PY=`pkg rquery -r FreeBSD "%dn" lang/python | head -n 1 | sed "s/python//"` > pkg install py${PY}-babel > >

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/py-subversion - Python 3 flavor?

2020-04-27 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 24.04.2020 0:33, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: >>> I must misunderstand completely. >> We now have `devel/subversion` which is 1.13.x and `devel/subversion-lts` >> which is now 1.10.x. As 1.14.0 will be LTS, BOTH ports will be updated. And >> till 1.15.0 these ports will be equivalent! > > If we

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/py-subversion - Python 3 flavor?

2020-04-27 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 24.04.2020 0:18, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: Problem is, python2 will be removed from ports (relatively) soon, so support python2 bindings in ports will be impossible after 2020-12-31 anyway... > * Python application using Subversion SWIG Python bindings also need to > modify to support

Re: Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/py-subversion - Python 3 flavor?

2020-04-27 Thread Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
On 2020/04/27 21:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > On 24.04.2020 0:33, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: > I must misunderstand completely. >>> We now have `devel/subversion` which is 1.13.x and `devel/subversion-lts` >>> which is now 1.10.x. As 1.14.0 will be LTS, BOTH ports will be updated. And >>>

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

2020-04-27 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-Apr-27, at 11:46, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:32:46 +0200 > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:13:46 -0700 >> Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 2020-Apr-26, at 01:14, Mark Millard wrote: >>> The below where based on

Re: python 2.7 marked as deprecated and EOL while 2.7.18 RC is available

2020-04-27 Thread ajtiM via freebsd-ports
I found that qt5-webengine needs Python 2.7: Build dependencies: bison : devel/bison ninja : devel/ninja yasm : devel/yasm input.h : devel/evdev-proto videodev2.h : multimedia/v4l_compat gperf : devel/gperf python2.7 : lang/python27

Re: aarch64 host based sysutils/u-boot-{pine64, rock64, rpi[34]} builds fail for: "aarch64-none-elf-gcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

2020-04-27 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-Apr-27, at 17:15, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Apr-27, at 11:46, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > >> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:32:46 +0200 >> Emmanuel Vadot wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:13:46 -0700 >>> Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >>> On 2020-Apr-26, at 01:14,

Oddities possibly contributing to lang/gcc9 not building (amd64->aarch64 poudriere based cross build)

2020-04-27 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
It appears that quoting vs. option handling is not working as the build expects or some odd file names involved: libtool: compile: mv -f "-fgnu-runtime.o" ".libs/NXConstStr.o" mv: illegal option -- g usage: mv [-f | -i | -n] [-hv] source target mv [-f | -i | -n] [-v] source ... directory

security/nss poudriere amd64->aarch64 cross-build failure: could not find libraries -lplc4 -lplds4 -lnspr4

2020-04-27 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
This was an amd64->aarch64 poudriere-devel based cross build, using nxb-bin. Ports head -r533162 . It looks like it expects the (nxb-bin based) cc to automatically look in /usr/local/lib/ (or wherever) for finding some matches to -lNAME but things were not set up for that to happen. It may need

Re: Using pkg in documentation

2020-04-27 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 2020-04-26 21:37, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: What is the way of mentioning about installing a py-package in documentation? Let’s say now the default version of python is 3.7 so in most of the cases we can write in our documentation that do the following: # pkg install py37-babel You

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2020-04-27 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: math/R: Upcoming major version update

2020-04-27 Thread Joseph Mingrone
Jason Bacon writes: > On 2020-04-25 22:50, Joseph Mingrone wrote: >> Hello all, >> You are receiving this message because you maintain a port that has a >> run-time dependency on math/R. This is a heads-up that math/R will be >> updated to version 4.0.0. As this is a major version change, R