Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Thu May 20 21:37:28 UTC 2021 : > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:48 PM Mark Millard wrote: > > > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > > Thu May 20 19:21:24 UTC 2021 : > > > > > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing

Re: Problem building py-cryptography

2021-05-20 Thread Simon Wright
Thanks Kubs, I'm travelling at the moment and will check further when I'm back home. The original build log was with libressl and ccache. I'll repeat without both and attach a new build log. Apologies for the top post. Regards, Simon. 20 May 2021 13:50:54 Kubilay Kocak : On 20/05/2021

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Chris
On 2021-05-20 13:47, Mark Millard wrote: Chris portmaster at bsdforge.com wrote on Thu May 20 20:09:29 UTC 2021 : On 2021-05-20 12:21, Kevin Oberman wrote: > . . . >> > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing the > config to BE_NATIVE to avoid building backends for

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-20, at 21:10, Chris wrote: > On 2021-05-20 13:47, Mark Millard wrote: >> Chris portmaster at bsdforge.com wrote on >> Thu May 20 20:09:29 UTC 2021 : >>> On 2021-05-20 12:21, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> > . . . >>> >> >>> > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by

Re: Problem building py-cryptography

2021-05-20 Thread Simon Wright
Thanks Kubs, I'm travelling at the moment and will check further when I'm back home. The original build log was with libressl and ccache. I'll repeat without both and attach a new build log. Apologies for the top post. Regards, Simon. 20 May 2021 13:50:54 Kubilay Kocak : On 20/05/2021

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:09:32PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > Thu May 20 21:37:28 UTC 2021 : > > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:48 PM Mark Millard wrote: > > > > > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > > > Thu May 20 19:21:24 UTC 2021 :

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:48 PM Mark Millard wrote: > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > Thu May 20 19:21:24 UTC 2021 : > > > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing the > > config to BE_NATIVE to avoid building backends for all FreeBSD supported > >

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Chris portmaster at bsdforge.com wrote on Thu May 20 20:09:29 UTC 2021 : > On 2021-05-20 12:21, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > . . . > >> > > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing the > > config to BE_NATIVE to avoid building backends for all FreeBSD supported > >

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2021-05-20 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

looking for ports committer (net/ldapbrowser)

2021-05-20 Thread Ronald Klop
Hi, Somebody changed the LICENSE* stuff in my net/ldapbrowser port. It does not compile anymore. This change fixes it. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255752 I mailed mat@ about his change breaking my port, but did not hear anything from him for about ten days. (no offense)

Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

2021-05-20 Thread Mathieu Arnold
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:44:15PM -0700, Chris wrote: > I'd like to subscribe to the commit messages > ( dev-commits-ports-all ) > but only receive messages that affect me -- the > ports I currently maintain. Is it possible? Or > am I just dreaming? ;-) > > Thanks in advance for any insight into

Re: looking for ports committer (net/ldapbrowser)

2021-05-20 Thread Ronald Klop
On 5/20/21 10:48 AM, Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, Somebody changed the LICENSE* stuff in my net/ldapbrowser port. It does not compile anymore. This change fixes it. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255752 I mailed mat@ about his change breaking my port, but did not hear anything

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Alexis Praga
Thanks for the suggestions. > At least, if your machine is powerful enough, you can edit your > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf and list these big ports in > ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES. I'm using ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes already so it won't help unfortunately, I think. > You can manually put the

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Andrea Venturoli ml at netfence.it wrote on Thu May 20 14:54:50 UTC 2021 : > On 5/20/21 4:11 PM, Alexis Praga wrote: > > > > Thanks for the suggestions. > > > >> At least, if your machine is powerful enough, you can edit your > >> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf and list these big ports in > >>

Re: Problem building py-cryptography

2021-05-20 Thread Simon Wright
On 20/05/2021 12:00 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 20/05/2021 1:21 pm, Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, I've been unable to build security/py-cryptography for about 10 days now. The build in Poudriere under 12.2 and 13.0 fail with a "Bad_C++_code" error. I tried removing the libressl dependency but

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Thu May 20 19:21:24 UTC 2021 : > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing the > config to BE_NATIVE to avoid building backends for all FreeBSD supported > platforms. Obviously this is not acceptable for many cases, but if you

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Chris
On 2021-05-20 12:21, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:08 AM Chris wrote: On 2021-05-20 06:15, Ronald Klop wrote: > On 5/20/21 2:47 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: >> El jue., 20 may. 2021 14:45, Alexis Praga >> escribió: >> >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I've recently been using

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-20, at 11:11, Mark Millard wrote: > Andrea Venturoli ml at netfence.it wrote on > Thu May 20 14:54:50 UTC 2021 : > >> On 5/20/21 4:11 PM, Alexis Praga wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the suggestions. >>> At least, if your machine is powerful enough, you can edit your

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:08 AM Chris wrote: > On 2021-05-20 06:15, Ronald Klop wrote: > > On 5/20/21 2:47 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > >> El jue., 20 may. 2021 14:45, Alexis Praga > >> escribió: > >> > >>> > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> I've recently been using poudriere to test news ports but

Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Alexis Praga
Hi guys, I've recently been using poudriere to test news ports but this resulted in building two large ports, namely: - devel/llvm [1] - lang/rust [2] Now, lang/rust takes 2 hourse to compile. So testing for 13.0, 12.2 and 11.4 means around 6 hours in total, a lot of time for my desktop

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le jeu. 20 mai 21 à 14:47:35 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía écrivait : > > Hi guys, Hello, > > I've recently been using poudriere to test news ports but this resulted in > > building two large ports, namely: > > - devel/llvm [1] > > - lang/rust [2] > > > > Now, lang/rust takes 2 hourse to

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Carmel
On Thu, 20 May 2021 16:11:21 +0200, Alexis Praga stated: >Thanks for the suggestions. > >> At least, if your machine is powerful enough, you can edit your >> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf and list these big ports in >> ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES. >I'm using ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes already so it won't

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Ronald Klop
On 5/20/21 2:47 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: El jue., 20 may. 2021 14:45, Alexis Praga escribió: Hi guys, I've recently been using poudriere to test news ports but this resulted in building two large ports, namely: - devel/llvm [1] - lang/rust [2] Now, lang/rust takes 2 hourse to

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
El jue., 20 may. 2021 14:45, Alexis Praga escribió: > > Hi guys, > > I've recently been using poudriere to test news ports but this resulted in > building two large ports, namely: > - devel/llvm [1] > - lang/rust [2] > > Now, lang/rust takes 2 hourse to compile. So testing for 13.0, 12.2 and >

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 5/20/21 4:11 PM, Alexis Praga wrote: Thanks for the suggestions. At least, if your machine is powerful enough, you can edit your /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf and list these big ports in ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES. I'm using ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes already so it won't help unfortunately, I

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Chris
On 2021-05-20 05:47, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: El jue., 20 may. 2021 14:45, Alexis Praga escribió: Hi guys, I've recently been using poudriere to test news ports but this resulted in building two large ports, namely: - devel/llvm [1] - lang/rust [2] Now, lang/rust takes 2 hourse to

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Chris
On 2021-05-20 06:15, Ronald Klop wrote: On 5/20/21 2:47 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: El jue., 20 may. 2021 14:45, Alexis Praga escribió: Hi guys, I've recently been using poudriere to test news ports but this resulted in building two large ports, namely: - devel/llvm [1] - lang/rust [2]