I have the following error when running glxgears using the ATI driver:
X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such
operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 158 (DAMAGE)
Minor opcode of failed request: 4 ()
Serial number of failed request: 37
Current
On Saturday 12 May 2007 12:53:00 pm vehemens wrote:
I have the following error when running glxgears using the ATI driver:
X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such
operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 158 (DAMAGE)
Minor opcode of failed request: 4
IMHO you should wait until we are ready to do a test-run on pointyhat.
Otherwise you are going to be finding problems one-at-a-time that we
can otherwise find out in bulk.
How does one get access to the port code?
To reiterate: there is very active work to get us to xorg7. It's not
as trivial
ssedov at mbsd.msk.ru wrote:
You can install X.org from GIT repository - it works fine out-of-the-box
on freebsd. Just install it under the different PREFIX (e.g. /usr/x11r7)
and you will not have problems with uninstall.
I don't appear to have the same luck as I'm having problems with several
On Thursday 03 August 2006 23:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What error message exactly you have got? The build procedure should look
like this (assume we're installing in /work/x11r7:
1) downlod Xorg source, unpack
2) download mesa src
2) install devel/gnu-autoconf, devel/gnu-automake
3)
On Fri Jan 30 11:53:16 PST 2009, Peter Jeremy wrote:
As a general note, this is the second time in a row that an X.org
upgrade broke X for a significant number of people. IMO, this
suggests that our approach to X.org upgrades needs significant changes
(see below). X11 is a critical component for
On Saturday 31 January 2009 01:25:21 pm Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/vehemens (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:53:58 -0800) *
| In general when upgrading, you take your chances. If a port upgrade
| fails, you should fall back to what worked.
So, a *fundamental* (practically an OS component) port
On Saturday 31 January 2009 04:20:26 pm Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/vehemens (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:54:42 -0800) *
| On Saturday 31 January 2009 01:25:21 pm Alex Goncharov wrote:
| So, a *fundamental* (practically an OS component) port is brought in
| -- and it disables my system
On Sunday 01 February 2009 11:22:52 am Alex Goncharov wrote:
| This has nothing to do with Linux. The issue is that that while src
| has a stable versus current branch, there is no stable branch for
| ports. The result is major updates are almost always problematic.
Any data points to
