Hi I have a P4 2.6Mhz running on FreeBSD 5.3.
Every few days the server crashes. When it crashes it says:
spin lock sleepq chain held by 0xc1eb7640 for 5 seconds
panic: spin lock held too long
Uptime: 2d3h56m36s
Anybody any idea how I can fix this?
Thanks!
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical
examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly
to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people
know what's available on the website. Before you post a question
here it might be a good idea to first search the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tobias Weingartner
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 9:54 PM
To: Sean Hafeez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: aac support
On Saturday, March 19,
David Kelly writes:
Its impossible to _prove_ the software is _not_ at fault just as its
impossible to prove the hardware is not at fault. When software works
for others but not on your hardware then one can only conclude there is
_something_ about your hardware.
It doesn't work for others.
Erik de Jong writes:
FWIW, I had WRITE_DMA time outs as well, on a non-SATA disk of about 3
years old. My instict told me to make that last backup real quick, so
that's what I did. The disk crashed about a week or two later. I'm an
absolute FreeBSD newbie, but hardware problems transcend OS
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:57:32 +0200, Abu Khaled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:04:10 +0100, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking at top and wondering the difference between WCPU and CPU
Have you tried man top
WCPU, when displayed, is the weighted cpu
Recently, I've been trying to get SSL support setup on my 5.3 machine's
qpopper. I've installed the port with the following options:
WITHOUT_APOP=yes WITHOUT_SSL=no WITH_STANDALONE_MODE=no
I've generated a SSL certificate file for qpopper's use. It doesn't seem to
complain about the
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 04:29:59PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
| 3) by not insisting at all that vendors open things at least a
|bit, Scott is not like Bill Paul or others who have opened
|up a lot of hardware, but is a lot more like Sam Leffler who
|has perpetuated
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Bell
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 8:15 PM
To: Mike Jeays
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD?
I'll second that the calendar/email functionality has
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Jeays
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 4:51 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD?
I have to disagree with this! In my organization, a government
Hello!
Does any body know, how can I use OpenBSD's pf (packet filter) for
determine total traffic volume on network interface? If it's
impossible, what facility you recommend me to do this?
--
Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii
,
___
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:16 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD?
Tricking-out a UNIX server just to avoid using Exchange may not
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 11:29 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD?
If the database becomes corrupted, which is highly unlikely,
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Fine, you list the features you think are key ones and I'll provide it.
Why not just buy Exchange?
You make the same mistake that so many people with emotional investments
in software make: You feel you must look for non-Microsoft solutions
_just for the sake of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 11:37 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD?
Jerry Bell writes:
I'll second that the calendar/email
Eugene M. Minkovskii wrote:
Hello!
Does any body know, how can I use OpenBSD's pf (packet filter) for
determine total traffic volume on network interface? If it's
impossible, what facility you recommend me to do this?
I don't realy know if it is impossible to use PF for monitoring the
total
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 1:53 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD?
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Fine, you list the features you think
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:58:53PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Not true, based on the heavy response on this issue on the mailing lists
every time it comes up.
Oh come on. All that noise is from the same eight or ten people, while the
thousands just ignore it and hope it will go away.
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Only if you purchase a backup software. If you want to use windows
backup you must shut down exchange because windows backup will not
back up open files.
You can back up a running Exchange server with the standard software
provided with Exchange and Windows.
Some
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
No they don't. Shared calendaring is a requirement once you
introduce e-mail to a large organization.
Most e-mail systems don't provide it. Organizations got along without
it before, so they don't actually need it. However, once they have it,
they like it, and they
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
You said you would be interested in other solutions that provided the
same features as Exchange. What is wrong, were you not telling the
truth?
I am telling the truth. But another solution that provides the same
features as Exchange will have ALL of them, and so it
Hello.
I am running the Postfix+Courier on MySQL setup found on:
http://www.high5.net/howto
I am wondering how to add and delete users, as well as adding
and deleting aliases -- and managing my virtual e-mail database
in general -- using a pure, clean and efficient approach,
rather than having
Guys/Gals,
One of my embedded machines died a while back after several years of service
(enough to erase my memory.). I am trying to rebuild the flash file system
on the machine, and ran into a snag. I'm attempting to manually install
4.11-REL on this system, as it is a rather old device with
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Fine, you list the features you think are key ones and I'll provide it.
Why not just buy Exchange?
You make the same mistake that so many people with emotional investments
in software make: You feel you must look for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hello
i am trying to set up decent gpg encryption in mutt,
so that my e-mails will look more professional. (like this
hushmail one)
what i'm doing so far is signing my messages, but mutt-devel
gives them stupid filenames (like 2.dat etc.) which
I'm trying to set up sendmail to route outgoing mail to an external SMTP
server. I need this for Mutt, which doesn't have its own means of transfering
mail and relies on whatever MTA the system provides. I found out about
sendmail's SMARTHOST capability and added this line to my host.mc
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Fine, you list the features you think are key ones and I'll provide it.
Why not just buy Exchange?
You make the same mistake that so many people with emotional investments
in software make: You feel you must look for non-Microsoft
Count me in on the group that doesn't think that a web-based system is
adequate for the enterprise, but in the realm of web-based groupware
systems, I have taken a strong liking to group office. I've not used all
of these below, but I've been most impressed with group office's interface
and
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
No it doesen't. There are open solutions that handle this well.
Exchange handles it better, and it's one-stop shopping.
And, one stop shopping is not always the best course of action. In fact,
it's extremely limiting in alot of ways.
Another thing,
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:17:33 -0500, John DeStefano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jason Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 02:00:48 +
Subject: Re: kern.maxpipekva exceeded, please see tuning(7)
On 03/13/05 15:44:32, John DeStefano wrote:
On Mar 20, 2005, at 2:24 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[ ... ]
In that case Dell is a customer of Adaptec, not the other way around,
so any NDA that Dell might require for Adaptec to sign would not
have restricted Adaptec's use of it's own programming documentation.
And you know this, because...?
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:10:57 +0100, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:57:32 +0200, Abu Khaled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:04:10 +0100, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking at top and wondering the difference between WCPU and CPU
Jerry Bell wrote:
Count me in on the group that doesn't think that a web-based system is
adequate for the enterprise, but in the realm of web-based groupware
systems, I have taken a strong liking to group office. I've not used all
of these below, but I've been most impressed with group
Hello all,
###
## Synopsis:
###
I just installed FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE doing the prepackaged User+X11
option, I updated everything (minus the RELEASE Security updates) with
portupgrade, and then I installed xfce4 (cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4 ;
make install clean).
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:41:33 -0500, Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2005, at 2:24 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[ ... ]
In that case Dell is a customer of Adaptec, not the other way around,
so any NDA that Dell might require for Adaptec to sign would not
have restricted Adaptec's
Dear Friends,
I had the problem reported in the message below with hylafax installation
compiled from scratch from
the standard ports of rel.5.3.
I solved the problem asking around to many mailing lists and found the
solution which - in this case - was as simple as:
chmod a+rx -R /var/spool
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:09:18 +0200, Abu Khaled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:10:57 +0100, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:57:32 +0200, Abu Khaled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:04:10 +0100, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eugene M. Minkovskii pe v ne 20. 03. 2005 v 12:31 +0300:
Hello!
Does any body know, how can I use OpenBSD's pf (packet filter) for
determine total traffic volume on network interface? If it's
impossible, what facility you recommend me to do this?
I don't know much about pf, but I use ipfw
Sorry for the silly question. Forget it!
Only after sending the email I noticed that in www.freebsd.org there's a rich
bug reporting section. I will use it, of course.
Ciao
Vittorio
Alle 16:02, domenica 20 marzo 2005, Vittorio ha scritto:
Dear Friends,
I had the problem reported in the
I have this working successfully with a Dell Axim PDA. Please attach
relevant logs and conf files
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 01:10 +0100, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to connect my BlueMedia PDA (rebrand of Yakumo Delta 300
GPS) to FreeBSD 5.3 using the uppc-kmod port.
I am
On Mar 20, 2005, at 10:00 AM, Adam wrote:
Have you read the NDA between Adaptec and Intel?
If not, how do you know just what it does or does not cover?
Once again, you're making claims of fact about a document that you've
probably never seen.
I think you are making wild assertions and have not
Hi all,
Is it just me, but I've had 2 Ebay Phishing e-mails to this e-mail
address that I only use for this mail list. Both mails where from
Comcast users !!
Rob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Robert Slade wrote:
Hi all,
Is it just me, but I've had 2 Ebay Phishing e-mails to this e-mail
address that I only use for this mail list. Both mails where from
Comcast users !!
Rob
Sounds like someone from Comcast is on this list AND using a Windows box
AND is infected.
Shame on you
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Karl Agee wrote:
FreeBSD 4.11-Stable. My printer has gone beszerk...and, I cant clear the
queue.
Here is some output:
bash-2.05b$ lpq -P hp
Warning: unable to get address list for remote machine : No address
associated with hostname
Warning: no daemon present
Rank
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
I'm trying to set up sendmail to route outgoing mail to an external SMTP
server. I need this for Mutt, which doesn't have its own means of transfering
mail and relies on whatever MTA the system provides. I found out about
sendmail's SMARTHOST
On 2005 Mar 20, at 6:41 AM, Charles Swiger wrote:
While I haven't seen Adaptec's NDA agreements, I'd bet a stack of
nickels they exist and limit the information Adaptec is able to make
public.
This is a moot point.
If Adaptec has been foolish enough to bind their own hands in this
manner then
Eugene M. Minkovskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does any body know, how can I use OpenBSD's pf (packet filter) for
determine total traffic volume on network interface? If it's
impossible, what facility you recommend me to do this?
Various pfctl -s options (eg pfctl -s info) give you counters
Someone broke the silence:
Hello.
I am running the Postfix+Courier on MySQL setup found on:
http://www.high5.net/howto
I am wondering how to add and delete users, as well as adding
and deleting aliases -- and managing my virtual e-mail database
in general -- using a pure, clean and
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Robert Slade wrote:
Is it just me, but I've had 2 Ebay Phishing e-mails to this e-mail
address that I only use for this mail list. Both mails where from
Comcast users !!
Mail to this list is reposted on the web and through multiple
mail-to-news gateways. So your address was
At 10:18 3/20/2005, Robert Slade wrote:
Hi all,
Is it just me, but I've had 2 Ebay Phishing e-mails to this e-mail
address that I only use for this mail list. Both mails where from
Comcast users !!
Please forward them (include headers) to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Same for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Start Here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-20, Warren Block scribbled these
curious markings:
If you have your own mailserver, most of this can be rejected by using
greylisting or by rejecting mail from dynamic Comcast IP addresses,
while still allowing mail coming from
As I follow this discussion an idea/question forms in my head.
The server side should be managed by BSD, but the client side is most
surely an heterogeneous group.
So a solution to somehow emulate/simulate an exchange server on an box
(or cluster of sql horde what ever servers), and import this
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 02:49:04PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
And how many more people have learned from this and will avoid
Adaptec products?
At least one, and that one will share his feelings with coworkers and friends
in the field you can be sure.
(perhaps these circles where it
Hello Freek
I run OO since month without problems (also remote over ssh). X-Version?
FreeBSD-Version? Did you make cvsuped fresh installation?
Am Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:04:36AM +0100 Freek Nossin schrieb:
Hello,
I recently installed OO.org via the ports. When I start one of its
Duo writes:
And you failed to answer his question. Why not stop trying to avoid it by
answering it.
I did answer it. I asked for a product that provides ALL the features
of Exchange. And he surely knows what all of the features of Exchange
are, otherwise he could not say with confidence that
And if I cannot code?
... Will you code one for me?
- Original Message -
From: Haulmark, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fafa Diliha Romanova [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Managing virtual e-mails
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:53:29 -0500
Someone broke the silence:
Duo writes:
And, one stop shopping is not always the best course of action. In fact,
it's extremely limiting in alot of ways.
Maybe, but that's the way a lot of organizations do it, and they have
both good and bad reasons for doing it that way.
Another thing, Exchange may have it all as you
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:17:10 -0500, Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Adaptec is special. It's normal for companies to enter
into a NDA agreement with their partners, and I'd bet a dollar to a
donut that LSI, Promise, 3ware, and other vendors of RAID hardware also
have
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
The original post in this thread, was about emulating an environment in
which to run exchange.
And I gave the original answer, which is that Exchange doesn't run on
anything but Windows servers, period.
That's not entirely true. The AS/400 can and do run Windows
Christian Tischler writes:
The server side should be managed by BSD, but the client side is most
surely an heterogeneous group.
The server side of what? It all depends on the complete architecture of
your IT infrastructure. For some situations, sendmail and qpopper are
all you'll ever need.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:22:23 -0600 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
||
||Robert Slade wrote:
|| Hi all,
||
|| Is it just me, but I've had 2 Ebay Phishing e-mails to this e-mail
|| address that I only use for this mail list. Both mails where from
|| Comcast users !!
||
|| Rob
||
||Sounds like
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Christian Tischler writes:
The server side should be managed by BSD, but the client side is most
surely an heterogeneous group.
The server side of what? It all depends on the complete architecture of
your IT infrastructure. For some situations, sendmail and
Hello again!
Your answers were a bit out of my league:
here is my rc.conf so far. i'm not sure if it's working
i haven't had a chance to reboot yet.
please let me know what you think of it?
# *** IPv6 configuration
#
ipv6_enable=YES
ipv6_gateway_enable=YES
I've been curious about this for a while. I have a freebsd 5.3 Release
Server running FTPD. Users running MS WIndows can connect to it just
find as long as they type in ftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED] However, when they
connect as ftp://ipaddress, the server thinks they are trying to
connect anonymously.
If you are, please show me your working setup :)
Either in the form of rc.conf, or a custom shell script.
Thank you,
-- Fafa
--
___
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
I recently setup a box with 5.3 release and enabled PF in order to do
NAT and eventually firewalling and bandwidth control when I become
more acustom to the workings of PF. Regardless of which however, I'm
having tremendous speed issues with the box currently.
Here is my pf.conf:
ext_if=rl1
Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:22:23 -0600 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
||
||Robert Slade wrote:
|| Hi all,
||
|| Is it just me, but I've had 2 Ebay Phishing e-mails to this e-mail
|| address that I only use for this mail list. Both mails where from
|| Comcast users !!
||
|| Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fafa Diliha Romanova
Sent: 20 March 2005 19:22
To: Vince Hoffman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IPv6 in rc.conf only: create gif0 / add route?
Hello again!
Hi,
Your answers were a
I think more information might be required than just your conf files. What
slow performance are you seeing? Are internal LAN clients having issues
with using this computer as a firewall/router? Are you running an internal
DNS? DHCPd?
Just a start..
T
- Original Message -
From:
I've got 'amd' starting with -F /etc/amd.conf from /etc/rc.conf:
amd_enable=YES # Run amd service with $amd_flags
amd_flags=-F /etc/amd.conf
amd_map_program=NO# Can be set to ypcat...
and my /etc/amd.conf file has, amoung other things...:
#
On Sunday 20 March 2005 11:53 am, Bob Ababurko wrote:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:22:23 -0600 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
||Robert Slade wrote:
|| Hi all,
||
|| Is it just me, but I've had 2 Ebay Phishing e-mails to this
|| e-mail address that I only use for this mail
I made the modifications suggested, but I still get the same error message.
Note the following part:
... while talking to smtp.liu.se.:
DATA
504 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sender address rejected: need fully-
qualified address
I'm guessing the problem is that obygden isn't a fully-qualified address,
On Mar 20, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Adam wrote:
Do you claim to speak for Adaptec? Your words are dangerously
ill-chosen if you do not work for Adaptec, because you are misleading
people about the company and about their products.
Quit being such a corporate apologist. They refuse to give out the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Charles Swiger
Sent: zondag 20 maart 2005 17:18
To: Adam
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd list; Theo de Raadt
Subject: Re: Adaptec AAC raid support
I'd bet a dollar to a donut that LSI, Promise,
I wasn't quite sure where to start, so I just gave conf lines.
The machine is not yet running DNS, DHCPd, etc. however once I have
this ironed out I do intend to setup caching DNS and DHCPd. The
problem seems to be with Internal LAN clients getting extremely slow
speeds. Web pages load extremely
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Christopher Nehren wrote:
On 2005-03-20, Warren Block scribbled these
curious markings:
If you have your own mailserver, most of this can be rejected by using
greylisting or by rejecting mail from dynamic Comcast IP addresses,
while still allowing mail coming from Comcast's
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Duo writes:
And you failed to answer his question. Why not stop trying to avoid it by
answering it.
I did answer it. I asked for a product that provides ALL the features
of Exchange. And he surely knows what all of the features of Exchange
are,
I did. My version ports tree was just a week old.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Schweizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zondag 20 maart 2005 19:09
To: Freek Nossin
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: oo.org unkillable process
Hello Freek
I run OO since month
Duo wrote:
Please, spare me. Welcome to the killfile, troll. You are the most
uncouth, evasive, unprofessional troll I have seen on this list. One
wonders why you are even on it, as you take every chance you get to try
to stomp on people who actually work to improve open souce.
*plonk*
On Mar 20, 2005, at 3:28 PM, Mark wrote:
I'd bet a dollar to a donut that LSI, Promise, 3ware, and other
vendors of RAID hardware also have NDA agreements which would prevent
those companies from making every single internal document available
to the public.
RANT
Nobody ever asked they make 'every
I reciently upgraded my home computer to FreeBSD 5.3 p5. Sense then I've had
minor problems connecting to my ISP. During boot up it will sometimes freeze
at the line, Configuring syscons: keymap blanktime. or I'll lose contact
with my ISP while sending an email or surfing the web. From an
Hi, i'm installing FreeBSD on my desktop, almost everything went fine,
except when i try to setup my connection.
The scenario: a static-ip, a direct connection to a router (which i do
NOT have ANY control over it) and a outside DNS server. When trying to
enter the gateway ip (10.0.0.9) through
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:13 -0500, Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pretend for a second that your first claim is actually correct, that
Adaptec does not want to sell hardware. Just what do you think you are
accomplishing by trying to convince people not to buy Adaptec hardware,
Mark Keating wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tobias Weingartner
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 9:54 PM
To: Sean Hafeez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: aac support
On Saturday,
Ned Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I reciently upgraded my home computer to FreeBSD 5.3 p5. Sense then I've had
minor problems connecting to my ISP. During boot up it will sometimes freeze
at the line, Configuring syscons: keymap blanktime. or I'll lose contact
with my ISP while
Augusto Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i'm installing FreeBSD on my desktop, almost everything went fine,
except when i try to setup my connection.
The scenario: a static-ip, a direct connection to a router (which i do
NOT have ANY control over it) and a outside DNS server. When
On Mar 20, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Adam wrote:
Pretend for a second that your first claim is actually correct, that
Adaptec does not want to sell hardware. Just what do you think you
are accomplishing by trying to convince people not to buy Adaptec
hardware, then? According to your words, that's
Since the original Adaptec guy Doug has blocked his mail, here is the
email address of the next person at Adaptec who is involved in this.
He has also previously indicated that he would be involved in any
decision to provide documentation on the aac RAID management
interface.
Marty Turner
[EMAIL
Hello dear people @ freebsd
something wonderfull ( at least in my case ) happened
since the last update of the base system on a sony vaio
laptop ( CPU: Intel Pentium III (694.84-MHz 686-class CPU) )
before, when the machine was compiling, it was getting
at 82 degrees with 100% CPU
now, with
I'm sorry, but aside from the chain of emails subject'd Adaptec AAC
raid support, what good does this email serve to the
freebsd-questions@ mailing lists? The only thing this is doing is
perpetuating the cycle of emails which is simply clogging inboxes.
While some of the discussion may be
Well, Tomas,
The issue is that not all FreeBSD users accept a dependency on
binary-only non-free components.
Some of them do care.
Perhaps not you, but some of them do.
I'm sorry, but aside from the chain of emails subject'd Adaptec AAC
raid support, what good does this email serve to the
Bill Moran wrote:
What is your IP address/netmask? What's the output of 'netstat -rn'?
Not enough information to be sure, but my first guess (based on the
source code for sysinstall) is that you're specifying an IP for the
gateway that is not reachable based on the IP/netmask for the interface.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:08:49 -0800 Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
||
||On Sunday 20 March 2005 11:53 am, Bob Ababurko wrote:
|| Gerard Seibert wrote:
|| On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:22:23 -0600 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||wrote:
|| ||Robert Slade wrote:
|| || Hi all,
|| ||
|| || Is it just
There is no problem with giving FreeBSD users who really do want free
software, and freedom of choice, the contact information for who to
talk to at Adaptec. Everyone in the Free Software industry should be
telling all hardware companies what they think about their ways of
doing business, whether
Géczi Szabolcs wrote:
after I made a cvsup and buildworld my pptp doesn't work well.
the clients can authenticate succesfully but they cannot reach subnet
except the tunnel's endpoint ip which is 192.168.1.1.
naturally my ppp/pptp configuration are unchanged.
What version were you upgrading
Mr. Turner,
I am very disappointed that Doug is no longer accepting emails
from Adaptec customers. I hope it is not Adaptec policy to just
disregard all customers when they start telling you how they feel
about your hardware and business practices. Previous talks with an
ex-employee from
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:28:10PM +1030, Bevan Coleman wrote:
I've just installed FreeBSD 5.3 onto a Sun Spac Blade 100 desktop
machine and have found that the console is slow behond useability
press key... wait 3 seconds...press next key).
OpenSSL and serial consoles are all fine with
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:06:17AM +0100, Gerard Meijer wrote:
Hi I have a P4 2.6Mhz running on FreeBSD 5.3.
Every few days the server crashes. When it crashes it says:
spin lock sleepq chain held by 0xc1eb7640 for 5 seconds
panic: spin lock held too long
Uptime: 2d3h56m36s
Anybody
Please, help me with my problem: make -j4 buildworld give me this error:
=== gnu/lib/libg2c
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libg2c.a
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libg2c/g2c.h
On Sunday 20 March 2005 03:24 pm, Victor Mel'nichenko wrote:
Please, help me with my problem: make -j4 buildworld give me this
error: === gnu/lib/libg2c
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libg2c.a
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root
-g
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
