On Tuesday 13 March 2007 22:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Slothouber wrote:
What version of FreeBSD are you currently running.
Check out the FreeBSD Handbook for step-by-step instructions for
synchronizing your source and building an updated kernel and userland.
As both a Christian and a FreeBSD user, I have stickers on my car
related to
both. It's truly humorous to see the occasional glare I might get
because of
Beastie or the rare double take due to both being there
simultaneously.
Luckily my church has a respectably sized geek community, and more
often
Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Yes the steps below do exactly that: upgrade everything, including the kernel.
1 Use the cvsup program (gotta figure how yet)
Use something like the following as supfile:
--- cut
*default host=cvsup.nl.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
Old Ranger wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 13:34, Jeff Rollin wrote:
On 13/03/07, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our beastie may be a bit devilish in some respects, but
please don't call him just a devil. Some people stay
away from FreeBSD for religious reasons. Feeding their
Anyone aware of a reason why a fresh build/install of exim 4.66 would cause
kernel panics and reboots on my FreeBSD 6.1 machine?
My machine, just out of the blue this morning, started rebooting every 3
minutes I narrowed it down to exim I think... As long as I never started
up exim 4.66 the
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:39:24PM -0700, Don O'Neil wrote:
Anyone aware of a reason why a fresh build/install of exim 4.66 would cause
kernel panics and reboots on my FreeBSD 6.1 machine?
It shouldn't, of course. Please follow up with the panic in the usual
way (developers handbook, PR, etc)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Slothouber wrote:
What version of FreeBSD are you currently running.
Sorry for pressing the point, but it seems you have not yet told us
which version of FreeBSD you are running.
/Darn this looks pretty complicated :-P
In that case, it may be simpler to just
I'm having trouble to bridge two wireless card which is Atheros AR5213A in
FreeBSD 6.1. I try to make transparent bridge in these two wireless card.
I compiled BRIDGE in kernel and I put
net.link.ether.bridge=1
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=*ath0*,*ath1*
net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1
in
On 3/13/07, Sung Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble to bridge two wireless card which is Atheros AR5213A in
FreeBSD 6.1. I try to make transparent bridge in these two wireless card.
I compiled BRIDGE in kernel and I put
net.link.ether.bridge=1
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Old Ranger wrote:
Believe it or not, I actually had an irate woman complain to me about having a
devil image on our church website. sheesh
Nothing is more complete than the delusion
that beauty equals goodness.
- Tolstoy
r
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Old Ranger wrote:
Believe it or not, I actually had an irate woman
complain to me about having a
devil image on our church website. sheesh
Nothing is more complete than the delusion
that beauty equals goodness.
-
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:14 PM, RW wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:36:41 -0800
jekillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 12, 2007, at 9:05 AM, RW wrote:
The important thing is really your reverse DNS, if you have control
of it and looks like a real server name, e.g. mail.example.com,
you can
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:00 -0400, Marcelo Maraboli wrote:
I agree. callbacks are not enough, you can reach a
false conclusion, that´s why I use SPF along with callbacks...
on the same message, my MX concludes:
you are sending email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], but shire.net
says YOUR
Please be very careful. The only real alternative (Intel comes and
goes) is Nvidia whose driver is binary-only for i386 (no amd64
support) and has a history for being notoriously buggy. I only buy ATI
because of the problems I keep seeing people have with the Nvidia
driver. I have a friend who
On Mar 13, 2007, at 16:33 , Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote:
We need to start hounding on AMD to publish the developer
documentation for all radeon chipsets. I for one will not buy any AMD
or ATI components until they decide to fix the
Kip Macy writes:
| Please be very careful. The only real alternative (Intel comes and
| goes) is Nvidia whose driver is binary-only for i386 (no amd64
| support) and has a history for being notoriously buggy. I only buy ATI
| because of the problems I keep seeing people have with the Nvidia
|
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Kip Macy writes:
| Please be very careful. The only real alternative (Intel comes and
| goes) is Nvidia whose driver is binary-only for i386 (no amd64
| support) and has a history for being notoriously buggy. I only buy ATI
| because of the problems I
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Kip Macy writes:
| Please be very careful. The only real alternative (Intel comes and
| goes) is Nvidia whose driver is binary-only for i386 (no amd64
| support) and has a history for being notoriously buggy. I only buy ATI
| because of the problems I
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that is a plus with nv is that X has some support for it,
whereas, the newer ati cards have no support :-( I was a fan of ati
since it was easier to get support. Now I'm starting to lean towards
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that is a plus with nv is that X has some support for it,
whereas, the newer ati cards have no support :-( I was a fan of ati
since it was easier to get support. Now I'm starting to lean towards
On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that is a plus with nv is that X has some support for it,
whereas, the newer ati cards have no support :-( I was a fan of ati
since it was easier to get
On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:00 -0400, Marcelo Maraboli wrote:
I agree. callbacks are not enough, you can reach a
false conclusion, that´s why I use SPF along with callbacks...
on the same message, my MX concludes:
you are
What is the _easiest_ way to upgrade from a FreeBSD 6.1-stable install to a
6.2-stable install? I can't run freebsd-update because it doesn't know about
-stable, and I'd prefer to avoid doing a buildworld because of the time.
Any suggestions?
___
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:00 -0400, Marcelo Maraboli wrote:
I agree. callbacks are not enough, you can reach a
false conclusion, that´s why I use SPF along with callbacks...
on the same
On Mar 13, 2007, at 9:30 PM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:00 -0400, Marcelo Maraboli wrote:
I agree. callbacks are not enough, you can reach a
false conclusion,
On Mar 13, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Don O'Neil wrote:
Anyone aware of a reason why a fresh build/install of exim 4.66
would cause
kernel panics and reboots on my FreeBSD 6.1 machine?
My machine, just out of the blue this morning, started rebooting
every 3
minutes I narrowed it down to exim I
On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:17 PM, jekillen wrote:
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:14 PM, RW wrote:
Just as long as you understand the distinction between forward and
reverse DNS. Based on the whois record for for your IP address, at
the
moment you appear to have the following reverse DNS for the
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:05:16PM +0100, Aitor San Juan wrote:
Hi List,
I am trying to install a secondary hard disk in a Intel-based PC
with FreeBSD 5.4
This secondary disk's capacity is 250 Gb. When I enter sysintall
to try to format it and create a slice, FreeBSD says that the
Hi there,
I don't do a whole lot of benchmarking: mostly my computer's
speed is perfectly adequate, and working reliably is key.
At the moment, though, I'm curious. I'm sitting here while I
attempt to restore a file from a level-0 dump, and it's taking a
while. The backup medium is one of
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:58:22PM -0500, Adam Gerety wrote:
What are the rules, in terms of using the FreeBSD Devil image to make
some stickers? I am huge fan/supporter of FreeBSD and want a sticker
that is just the Devil to put on my computers. Not planning to sell
them, though it
On 3/13/07, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to start hounding on AMD to publish the developer
documentation for all radeon chipsets. I for one will not buy any AMD
or ATI components until they decide to fix the problem.
Here's the email address of AMD's president: [EMAIL
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:24:50 -0700 Don O'Neil wrote:
What is the _easiest_ way to upgrade from a FreeBSD 6.1-stable install to a
6.2-stable install? I can't run freebsd-update because it doesn't know about
-stable, and I'd prefer to avoid doing a buildworld because of the time.
Any
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
