Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
I want to upgrade two freebsd machines I have from 6.1-SECURITY
and 5.3-RELEASE respectively, to the latest 7.0 release of
FreeBSD. I don't want to cvsup and build, but prefer to use
prebuilt binaries. Also I'd like to avoid wiping the systems,
and starting
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:31:23PM -, DSA - JCR wrote:
Hi all
FreeBSD 6.2
I would like to put a password when booting/mounting mi Freebsd box. is
it possible? How?
Yes. Use geli(8) encryption.
is for protecting the system from unauthorized users
Disk encryption also protects your data
Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
The 6.1 system seem to be running 7.0-p2 now, though. Thanks!
It is still upgrading ports. Fortunately this box does nothing
important, and is just my personal playground. If something gets
messed up, noe problem. I'm trying to upgrade the ports binary as
well,
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Jul 26, 2008, at 19:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite
extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in
FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was deemed
important
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:47:44AM -, DSA - JCR wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:31:23PM -, DSA - JCR wrote:
Hi all
FreeBSD 6.2
I would like to put a password when booting/mounting mi Freebsd box. is
it possible? How?
Yes. Use geli(8) encryption.
is for protecting the
Hello,
I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale
DNS server.
I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X…
This has been useless!!
I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!!
Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps
Has this been removed or is it still supported?
It does not appear in the man page or examples...
NO_BIND=true
-JD
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
At 2008-07-27T12:52:56+02:00, bsd wrote:
Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps without
breaking the system… What would you suggest?
One way is to use the `ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves' port to iteratively
remove the superfluous leaves of your package tree. It can also be
done
bsd :
Hello,
I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale DNS
server.
I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X…
This has been useless!!
Better doing it your self.
I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!!
Is there a good way to
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:52:56 +0200
bsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale
DNS server.
I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X___
This has been useless!!
I am now ending up with 250 apps in the
At 03:03 PM 7/27/2008 +0300, Reko Turja wrote:
make.conf has been split into two, the actual make.conf which has
variables for the make process and generic make environment and
src.conf which controls the building of add-on software. Check
src.conf for details.
-Reko
so something like this
Has this been removed or is it still supported?
It does not appear in the man page or examples...
NO_BIND=true
make.conf has been split into two, the actual make.conf which has
variables for the make process and generic make environment and
src.conf which controls the building of add-on
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=true
I am not sure of the need for the 'true' or not. it seems it is not
required but should work either way?
From the manpage:
The values of variables are ignored regardless of their setting;
even if
they would be set to ``FALSE'' or ``NO''. Just the existence
On Sun 2008-07-27 12:52:56 UTC+0200, bsd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale DNS
server.
I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X?
This has been useless!!
I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:17:44 +1000, andrew clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun 2008-07-27 12:52:56 UTC+0200, bsd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale DNS
server.
I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install
G'Day all,
got a freebsd Box
FreeBSD gw.ade.eltrak.com.au 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul
9 03:46:03 CST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ELKERN i386
that has a poptop server on it. When a client logs in they get authed
fine and get issued an IP. However when
why it can't be say 5 disks+parity?
The reason is in the definition on RAID 3, which says the updates to the
RAID device must be atomic. In some ideal universe, RAID 3 is implemented in
hardware and on individual bytes, but here we cannot write to the drives in
units other than sectorsize
ad5: 476940MB MAXTOR STM3500630AS 3.AAE at ata2-slave SATA150
ad6: 305245MB Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 V54OA7EA at ata3-master SATA150
Does this mean I'm only getting half the throughput I could be getting?
still more that actually drive can get from media (about 100MB/s)
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Jul 26, 2008, at 19:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite
extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in
FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was deemed
important
/etc/malloc.conf. The default for that file is to not exist. The man page
does not indicate which settings are used in that situation. After reading
through it I get the feeling that the default settings for D and M are 'dM'.
Hence, to return to the older malloc aproach to see if the
Hi Derek
thanks for the reply.
My intention was to deliver the mails between the workstations on the
LAN directly. Every Workstation
on the LAN would have an appropriate cf file which forwards mails with
a destination on the WAN - to the
WAN-Smarthost, any mail going to a destination from inside
At 03:49 PM 7/27/2008, Bruno Joho wrote:
Hi Derek
thanks for the reply.
My intention was to deliver the mails between the workstations on the
LAN directly. Every Workstation
on the LAN would have an appropriate cf file which forwards mails with
a destination on the WAN - to the
WAN-Smarthost,
I will be out of the office starting 2008.07.27 and will not return until
2008.07.28.
Busiu isvykes nuo 2008-07-28 iki 2008-08-10. I Jusu laiska atsakysiu
grizes. Skubiais atvejais prasau kreiptis i Lina Linkaite tel. 8 (5)
2786278 arba e-mail'u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello:
i have two interfaces installed on my freebsd machine (desktop); one is
wireless (ath0, facing the internet, 192.168.1.10/24) and another is internal
(fxp0, 192.168.2.1/24). the internet facing interface of the freebsd works
fine: from my xp laptop (192.168.1.2), i can ping the
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700,
Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D The program has worked under considerable load for many years with versions
D 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is quite complex
D and big. It uses probably hundreds of mallocs in a typical use.
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Vogel) wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700,
Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D The program has worked under considerable load for many years with
D versions 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is
26 matches
Mail list logo
