Hi,
My postfix mail servers shows to messages in the queue saying
(host mx1.FreeBSD.org[69.147.83.52] said: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected:
cannot find your hostname, [86.58.167.132] (in reply to RCPT TO command))
But when i do a lookup or a reverse lookup, i find my hostname, also
from
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:07:47 +0200, Aggelidis Nikos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi to all the list,
i need some help... Is it possible to open four consoles as
root(authenticate yourself once), in each one run a specific program
and do this through a script? {bash or python).
i want to open 4
If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?
Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386:
disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb;
ad0a (/), ad0b (swap), ad0d (/var) etc... correct or not (then what)?
You're mixing terminology here. :-) The use entire disk will
create a slice for FreeBSD covering the complete disk. A slice
is what MICROS~1 calls primary partition.
Now the conclusion: Let's say you create a slice on ad0,
I don't know why, but it looks like I never crossed paths with FreeBSD. Only
recently, I took a peek in the apparently well-written documentation. Now I
have some spare time and also a spare machine (a Fujitsu Lifebook), and I
thought I'd give FreeBSD a spin, just out of mere curiosity.
Hiya
I recently started (trying) to use sshit to filter the many brute
force sshd attacks.
However, it has never worked on my box. FreeBSD 7.0 p1.
This morning it would only give a message (without exiting)
Could not create semaphore set: No space left on device
at
On 12/2/08, Niki Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just installed FreeBSD 6.4 on a Fujitsu lifebook. I'm quite new to
FreeBSD (see previous post Introduction). Some time ago, I had bought
(and partially read) Michael Urban's FreeBSD 6 Unleashed. I just
worked through the initial
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DA Forsyth wrote:
Hiya
I recently started (trying) to use sshit to filter the many brute
force sshd attacks.
However, it has never worked on my box. FreeBSD 7.0 p1.
This morning it would only give a message (without exiting)
Could not
In response to DA Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hiya
I recently started (trying) to use sshit to filter the many brute
force sshd attacks.
However, it has never worked on my box. FreeBSD 7.0 p1.
This morning it would only give a message (without exiting)
Could not create semaphore
can try `pkg_delete -a`
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Leslie Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
How would you guys uninstall a meta-port?
I'm considering a move to kde4 but I want a clean install, so I want to
remove the kde3 meta-port first.
Thanks
/Leslie
Hi,
I just installed FreeBSD 6.4 on a Fujitsu lifebook. I'm quite new to
FreeBSD (see previous post Introduction). Some time ago, I had bought
(and partially read) Michael Urban's FreeBSD 6 Unleashed. I just
worked through the initial chapters, and managed installing FreeBSD and
configuring
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
368 vs 372 is that the 64 bit is compiled for 64 bit, and uses a little more
space.
/ Ebbe
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:57:23 -0800, Yuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
The FreeBSD malloc(3) implementation can use either mmap() or sbrk() to
obtain memory from the system. It does not 'waste a high percentage of
memory' but it simply maps only high addresses (with an
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 12:33:52 Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I just installed FreeBSD 6.4 on a Fujitsu lifebook. I'm quite new to
FreeBSD (see previous post Introduction). Some time ago, I had bought
(and partially read) Michael Urban's FreeBSD 6 Unleashed. I just
worked through the initial
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
I never googled it before, but 2 sec gave me
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:38:02 +0100
Leslie Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would you guys uninstall a meta-port?
I'm considering a move to kde4 but I want a clean install, so I want
to remove the kde3 meta-port first.
Well, you might try navigating to the kde3 port /usr/ports/x11/kde3
and
So use the amd64 ;)
Is the amd64 distribution mature enough, as compared to the i386?
yes
Aren't there any problems to be expected to arrive, months after
initial install and way in the production usage ??
no.
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some
hi to all the list,
i need some help... Is it possible to open four consoles as
root(authenticate yourself once), in each one run a specific program
and do this through a script? {bash or python).
i want to open 4 xterms in the four corners of the screen. In 3 xterms
i want to run specific
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
___
Hello list,
Are there any stand-alone, GTK2, wlan config apps out there (basic
stuff, like viewing available networks, setting wpa key, connecting,
etc.)?
I'm using xfce, and the wlan plugin thingie can only show the signal
strength, assuming i'm already connected.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Ghirai.
What about DragonFlyBSD's new HAMMER FS? I hear it has similar capabilities
as ZFS without the overhead. Though, strangely, I haven't really heard
anyone discuss it even though it was released some months ago.
it's maybe pre-pre-prerelease.
it's not finished yet.
If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?
Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386:
disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb;
Hi,
I'm an Austrian sysadmin living in Montpezat (South France), and a 100%
GNU/Linux user since 2001. I've started with Slackware (7.1, I think) on
a battered 486, hopped distros for some time, used Mandriva, Debian
and then Slackware again for a few years. In the last two years or so,
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
Nvidia!!!
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG -
2008/12/2 Nathan Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What about DragonFlyBSD's new HAMMER FS? I hear it has similar capabilities
as ZFS without the overhead. Though, strangely, I haven't really heard
anyone discuss it even though it was released some months ago.
Well, that's because it doesn't :)
If one has a system with 7 500Gb SATA disks in a hardware RAID6
(Areca Raid Controller), then (according to mail J.Chadwick 7
Nov 2008) they will show up as da (following naming convention
for scsi disks although they are not).
RAID6 will allow about 2,5 Tb for the 'user' (roughly 1 Tb will
be
Johan Hendriks wrote:
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
Nvidia!!!
I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 09:04:56 Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2008 21:43:08 Javier Vasquez wrote:
On 12/2/08, Javier Vasquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was reading chapter 4 of the handbook, as well as chapters 24 and
26... If I got it clear, I pretty much
Hi all
After a kernel recompilation on i386 RELENG_7 (not the latest), I cannot power
down the machine.
kldstat shows acpi.ko is loaded.
It used to switch off but now the shutdown -p now halts the system with
following messages:
The operating system has halted.
Please press any key to reboot.
=?windows-1250?Q?Ott_K=F6stner?= writes:
I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD on my desktop, just
because of Nvidia drivers.
Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to
expect 64 bit Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is
the problem with
Nvidia drivers.
Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit
Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia?
Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?
because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them)
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Polytropon wrote:
ad0 |---| the whole disk
ad0s1 \--/ one slice
ad0s1X \--/\---/\-/\-/\---/\/ partitions
a b d e f g
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 10:32:48 Adam Zaleski wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem setting up some permissions to file
and editing this file with vi.. I have two different
examples to show you what I mean... First one:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo some text some_file.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2
There
Nvidia drivers.
Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit
Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia?
Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?
because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them)
They
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If FreeBSD is to put on the system as only operating system (Fdisk:
A = Use Entire disk), then will the BSD-partitions will show up as
ad0a (/), ad0b (swap), ad0d (/var) etc... correct or not (then what)?
You're
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Johan Hendriks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
Nvidia!!!
No Nvidia
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 08:38:02 Leslie Jensen wrote:
How would you guys uninstall a meta-port?
I'm considering a move to kde4 but I want a clean install, so I want to
remove the kde3 meta-port first.
cd /usr/ports/x11/kde3
for dep in `make -V RUN_DEPENDS`; do
origin=${dep##*:};
My box is a web/mail/vpn/router/samba (yes i know there shouldn't be
that many services
on the box, but tell my boss that) and all the apps are working like a charm.
his money his problem. overspending on hardware it's quite common, instead
of paying more employees with the same money.
Hello,
I have a problem setting up some permissions to file
and editing this file with vi.. I have two different
examples to show you what I mean... First one:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo some text some_file.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ chmod 000 some_file.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
Jerry skrev:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:38:02 +0100
Leslie Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would you guys uninstall a meta-port?
I'm considering a move to kde4 but I want a clean install, so I want
to remove the kde3 meta-port first.
Well, you might try navigating to the kde3 port
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 08:52:58 Ji wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Mel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 07:41:17 Ji wrote:
Hi all,
...
atapci0: Intel ICH9 SATA300 controller port
0xbc30-0xbc37,0xbc28-0xbc2b,0xbc38-0xbc3f,0xbc2c-0xbc2f,0xbc40-0xbc4f,0x
Why I am able to put some text into some_file.txt with
chmod 000 using vi editor and why i can not do the same
using echo???
I'm not exactly vi master or guru here but I think it's because you write vi
with :wq! command. If you write tried to write some_file.txt with :w instead,
vi would
On Tue 2008-12-02 19:26:40 UTC+0530, Masoom Shaikh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
How would you guys uninstall a meta-port?
can try `pkg_delete -a`
No Masoom, this is wrong advice. pkg_delete(1) manpage:
-a, --all
Unconditionally delete all currently installed packages.
On Tue 2008-12-02 00:41:58 UTC-0600, Javier Vasquez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was reading chapter 4 of the handbook, as well as chapters 24 and
26... If I got it clear, I pretty much might get the base system
updated by using freebsd-update script. Ports collection can get
updated with
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Polytropon wrote:
ad0 |---| the whole disk
ad0s1 \--/ one slice
ad0s1X
On Tue 2008-12-02 09:28:44 UTC+0100, Mel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Portupgrade -PP is detrimental for bandwidth. It's not really portupgrade's
fault (well, partially, it shouldn't offer the feature), because it will
quite often download Latest/foo.tbz, unpack it entirely and then say oops,
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 17:13:58 andrew clarke wrote:
On Tue 2008-12-02 09:28:44 UTC+0100, Mel
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Portupgrade -PP is detrimental for bandwidth. It's not really
portupgrade's fault (well, partially, it shouldn't offer the feature),
because it will quite often
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:56:44AM +0100, Pieter Donche wrote:
If one has a system with 7 500Gb SATA disks in a hardware RAID6
(Areca Raid Controller), then (according to mail J.Chadwick 7
Nov 2008) they will show up as da (following naming convention
for scsi disks although they are not).
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
While I agree that, without some kind of supporting argument, the
statement that Linux systems are low end Unix replacements are kind
of
spurious sounding, I don't think that market share is really an
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 07:39:39PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
unix is not windows replacements. all of these GUI overlays for which that
much noise is heard are not just overlays, but are poorly designed even
more poorly than windows.
Windows is poorly designed too but at least it's
On Tue 2008-12-02 17:22:53 UTC+0100, Mel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes, this happens. -PP is not ideal for regular updates but it's
still useful for when you have a new FreeBSD install with no packages
installed, and want to get up and running quickly, grabbing the most
recent binaries
On 12/2/08, andrew clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 2008-12-02 00:41:58 UTC-0600, Javier Vasquez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I was reading chapter 4 of the handbook, as well as chapters 24 and
26... If I got it clear, I pretty much might get the base system
updated by using
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If FreeBSD is to put on the system as only operating system (Fdisk:
A = Use Entire disk), then will the BSD-partitions will show up as
ad0a (/),
On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Anthony M. Rasat wrote:
Fellas, I need opinions. Asus Eee PC, SSD storage, 512MB RAM, with
GNOME and other desktop thingy (testing out of curiousity).
Question is, swap or no swap? Remember, this is SSD, it is
reasonable to have no swap. However, what if I
Wojciech Puchar([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.12.02 11:09:53 +0100:
What about DragonFlyBSD's new HAMMER FS? I hear it has similar capabilities
as ZFS without the overhead. Though, strangely, I haven't really heard
anyone discuss it even though it was released some months ago.
it's maybe
With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if it's
really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory utilization,
speed, stability, etc...
So, my question is this... If you were building a brand new 6.3/7.0 server
with decent performance (dual core, 32 Bit OS -
With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if it's
really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory utilization,
no
speed, stability, etc...
So, my question is this... If you were building a brand new 6.3/7.0 server
with decent performance (dual core, 32
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 17:13:58 andrew clarke wrote:
On Tue 2008-12-02 09:28:44 UTC+0100, Mel
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Portupgrade -PP is detrimental for bandwidth. It's not really
portupgrade's fault (well, partially, it shouldn't offer the feature),
It's already usable on DragonFly. DragonFLY itself is stable, but only
supports one CPUIt probably will never be ported to FreeBSD due to
API differences.
time to wait and see if they will really make dragonfly faster than
FreeBSD (it's their goal)...
Fellas, I need opinions. Asus Eee PC, SSD storage, 512MB RAM, with GNOME and
other desktop thingy (testing out of curiousity).
Question is, swap or no swap? Remember, this is SSD, it is reasonable to have
no swap. However, what if I wanted OpenOffice? This beast is memory hog AFAIK.
Thanks
Anthony,
SSD or no, I feel that you should treat it as you would any other
hard disks doesn't wear on writes. SSD do
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
I'm having an issue installing FreeBSD 7 AMD64 on a Dell Poweredge R805.
The system starts to boot, throws several mpt_cam_event 0x12 and 0x16
errors, presents the boot menu, and then crashes with a Fatal trap
12: page fault while in kernel mode and then wants to reboot.
This is a dual
Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are
Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are
Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:56:52PM +, Anthony M. Rasat wrote:
Fellas, I need opinions. Asus Eee PC, SSD storage, 512MB RAM, with GNOME
and other desktop thingy (testing out of curiousity).
Question is, swap or no swap? Remember, this is SSD, it is reasonable
to have no swap. However,
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 19:03:44 Boris Samorodov wrote:
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 17:13:58 andrew clarke wrote:
On Tue 2008-12-02 09:28:44 UTC+0100, Mel
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Portupgrade -PP is detrimental for bandwidth. It's not really
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On the other hand, both Unix and Linux have a long way to go before
they
can match Microsoft's ease of use on the GUI. I believe the best way
to attack that problem is to find a
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 08:23:09PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Roland Smith writes:
pdftotext fail on the large [32MB] file I've got. Is there any
other way I can translate this huge textfile to ascii or html or
text?
Please define fail in this context? I've used
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
It's already usable on DragonFly. DragonFLY itself is stable, but only
supports one CPUIt probably will never be ported to FreeBSD due to
API differences.
time to wait and see if they will really make dragonfly faster than
FreeBSD (it's their goal)...
Yes, have some swap. The system uses this space for more than swapping
out processes. It uses it for paging and for crash dumping. The
rule of thumb is 2.2 times memory size.
why not 2.17?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On the other hand, both Unix and Linux have a long way to go before
they
can match Microsoft's ease of use on the GUI. I believe the best
Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On the other hand, both Unix and Linux have a long way to go before
they
can match Microsoft's ease of use on the GUI. I believe the best
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
What about DragonFlyBSD's new HAMMER FS? I hear it has similar
capabilities
as ZFS without the overhead. Though, strangely, I haven't really heard
anyone discuss it even though it was released some months ago.
it's maybe pre-pre-prerelease.
it's not finished
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On the other hand, both Unix and Linux have a long way to go before
they
can match Microsoft's ease of use
Once you fix basic problems like these, then we can talk about how to
redefine ease of use.
Bob McConnell
ease of use is always relative to the person using.
Ease of use is also relative to the training investment. In X, a moderate
investment some 20-odd years ago still pays, even
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Yes, have some swap. The system uses this space for more than swapping
out processes. It uses it for paging and for crash dumping. The
rule of thumb is 2.2 times memory size.
why not 2.17?
Sounds good to me.Takes one
Yes, have some swap. The system uses this space for more than swapping
out processes. It uses it for paging and for crash dumping. The
rule of thumb is 2.2 times memory size.
why not 2.17?
Sounds good to me.Takes one more character to type...
and both 2.2 and 2.17 is nonsense.
the
This is why I can easily justify teaching my elders FreeBSD -- they
unquestionably have more to learn, but they only learn it once, so the
investment pays off.
but most people don't like to learn. even once.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
I don't think HAMMER intends to implement a significant portion of ZFS's
it intends to implement what's needed.
anyway - lets wait when it will be really finished
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:53:23 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know / is the root partition, but /root is the home-directory of
the user root (/etc/passwd: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh).
I doubt this will ever be needed to be large?
There is no special advice about
time to wait and see if they will really make dragonfly faster than
FreeBSD (it's their goal)...
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/dfly.html
Good luck to them, they need it :)
indeed:)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I am compiling firefox 3. It just hangs at these lines.
/usr/ports/www/firefox3/work/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/FreeBSD7.0_OPT.OBJ/shlibsign
-v -i /usr/ports/www/firefox3/work/mozilla/dist/lib/libsoftokn3.so
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Tyson Boellstorff wrote:
Once you fix basic problems like these, then we can talk about how to
redefine ease of use.
Bob McConnell
ease of use is always relative to the person using.
Ease of use is also relative to the training investment. In X, a moderate
investment some
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:23:49PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
This is why I can easily justify teaching my elders FreeBSD -- they
unquestionably have more to learn, but they only learn it once, so the
investment pays off.
but most people don't like to learn. even once.
You need to begin
is there a magic foo i need to make it work? sees my printer, says its
printing, finishes job, and yet.. no paper.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Hi,
My postfix mail servers shows to messages in the queue saying
(host mx1.FreeBSD.org[69.147.83.52] said: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected:
cannot find your hostname, [86.58.167.132] (in reply to RCPT TO command))
But when i do a lookup or a reverse lookup, i find my hostname.
Does
Anthony M. Rasat wrote:
The rule of thumb is 2.2 times memory size.
why not 2.17?
Sounds good to me.Takes one more character to type...
and both 2.2 and 2.17 is nonsense.
the only rule is use as much as needed
It's fun watching you fellas argue about 0.03 thing.
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 04:54:27 Bill Moran wrote:
In response to DA Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hiya
I recently started (trying) to use sshit to filter the many brute
force sshd attacks.
However, it has never worked on my box. FreeBSD 7.0 p1.
This morning it would only give a
Ivan Voras([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.12.02 20:00:46 +0100:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
It's already usable on DragonFly. DragonFLY itself is stable, but only
supports one CPUIt probably will never be ported to FreeBSD due to
API differences.
time to wait and see if they will really make
I put in your opinions in kinda pros or cons to swap in Asus Eee PC like
following:
Pros: 1) System requires swap. Period.
it doesn't.
Cons: 1) Since SSD is manufactured have limited lifetime (around 100,000
1 for MLC flash it uses. after every rewrite flash gets less reliable
and
That's a stupid benchmark. DragonFly doesn't have SMP support yet.
my benchmark is to start it install programs i use commonly and compare
it to other system.
on single-core machine i tested FreeBSD is faster.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Don O'Neil([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.12.02 08:57:58 -0800:
With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if it's
really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory utilization,
speed, stability, etc...
From everything I've read people use it in production
time to wait and see if they will really make dragonfly faster than
FreeBSD (it's their goal)...
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/dfly.html
Good luck to them, they need it :)
That's a stupid benchmark. DragonFly doesn't have SMP support yet.
So? Look at just the UP scores
Le 01/12/2008 à 09:59:15-0600, Kirk Strauser a écrit
I have ZFS on my 7.1-PRERELEASE system, and while it does some spiffy things,
in general I'm a bit underwhelmed.
PROS:
Adding new filesystems on a whim is really nice.
It has a lot of really cool other features that I will
performance and 1.8 times higher than freebsd 4 UP performance.
Please explain how DragonFly's lack of SMP affects the UP performance?
doesn't affect of course.
yes dragonflybsd is slower.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To come back to FreeBSD, I'm using FreeBSD since 10 years, UFS is very
slow, and when UFS2 is release I'm very happy to switch to UFS2.
simply turn on softupdates and turn off atime
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Wojciech Puchar([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.12.02 22:14:55 +0100:
That's a stupid benchmark. DragonFly doesn't have SMP support yet.
my benchmark is to start it install programs i use commonly and compare
it to other system.
on single-core machine i tested FreeBSD is faster.
Good things come
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
