[freebsd-network]why when OS reboot, my NIC status show no carrier

2009-02-18 Thread wang_jiabo
Hello, all: before freebsd show hostname#, we can see NIC card status, but my NIC card status always show status: no carrier after I login my freebsd , I used ifconfig command show my NIC card status is active could have any skill I can let my NIC card status show status: active before

Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

2009-02-18 Thread Ian Smith
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:43:30 + Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, even though I have rebooted the xxx box many times since. Does this mean the corresponding entry in /var/run/utmp is wrong and

Problem with dbus and hald on FreeBSD-7.1

2009-02-18 Thread manish jain
Hi, I installed FreeBSD 7.1 on my system a couple of days back. While the rest of the system works very well, I keep getting the following errors when I start gnome : gnome-keyring-daemon : couldn't allocate secure memory to keep passwords and or keys from being written to the disk

Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

2009-02-18 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:08:41PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:43:30 + Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, even though I have rebooted the xxx box many times since. Does this mean

console-kit-daemon errors

2009-02-18 Thread manish jain
Hi, Please ignore my previous message Problem with dbus and hald on FreeBSD-7.1. I added dbus_enable=YES and hald_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf. This solved the earlier problems, giving way to a new one. Now I am getting the following problem when I try to start gnome :

Re: Performance problem with samba/zfs

2009-02-18 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
Hi! On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Jonathan Belson j...@witchspace.com wrote: Hiya I export a few samba shares from a FreeBSD amd64 server and I've been editing text files on one of the shares via a Windows box. This /usually/ works fine, but occasionally I'll get a pause of several

Re: [freebsd-network]why when OS reboot, my NIC status show no carrier

2009-02-18 Thread Wojciech Puchar
before freebsd show hostname#, we can see NIC card status, but my NIC card status always show status: no carrier because it needs a while to get up. all is fine. after I login my freebsd , I used ifconfig command show my NIC card status is active could have any skill I can let my NIC

Re: Determining process preventing umount of busy partition

2009-02-18 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:30:55 -0900, Mel fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net wrote: This is weird, though. New theories (where are Chase, Cameron and Foreman when you need them!): Spying around in someone else's house. :-) fstat is lying, instead use: fstat -f /usr -m -v Well, I've

Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers

2009-02-18 Thread Gabe
--- On Sat, 2/14/09, Gabe n...@att.net wrote: From: Gabe n...@att.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers To: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 8:41 PM --- On Sat, 2/14/09, Matthew Seaman

Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

2009-02-18 Thread GESBBB
I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON.     snippet # See if we are running via CRON     if [ ! -t 0 ]   then # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0 32767     RESTING=$((RANDOM/60))     sleep ${RESTING}     fi /snippet    

wrong time stamp 1 JAN 1970 on /var/tmp/orbit-user

2009-02-18 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I use FBSD 6.4-stable alpha. When starting a browser (firefox2 or kazehakase) no window is open, instead: GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

2009-02-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 GESBBB wrote: | I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON. | | | snippet | # See if we are running via CRON | if [ ! -t 0 ] | then | # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0

Re: Performance problem with samba/zfs

2009-02-18 Thread Jonathan Belson
Mel wrote: On Monday 16 February 2009 07:56:02 Jonathan Belson wrote: I export a few samba shares from a FreeBSD amd64 server and I've been editing text files on one of the shares via a Windows box. This /usually/ works fine, but occasionally I'll get a pause of several seconds when I save

memory limitations per process

2009-02-18 Thread af300wsm
Hi, I'm running into a per process memory limit at work (on Windoze though), but I'm wondering what's the limit per process in FreeBSD for 32 bit systems, ie i386? Is it 4gb or 2? From stuff I found on the Net, I'm guessing 4gb, but wanted to ask anyway. It seems to be an implementation

No periodic daily?

2009-02-18 Thread Kurt Buff
All, I'm having a strange issue with one of my boxes. It's the router for our DS3: router#uname -a FreeBSD router.mycompany.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon May 19 01:16:12 PDT 2008 r...@router.mycompany.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 The machine has stopped sending periodic

Re: No periodic daily?

2009-02-18 Thread Kurt Buff
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: All, I'm having a strange issue with one of my boxes. It's the router for our DS3: router#uname -a FreeBSD router.mycompany.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon May 19 01:16:12 PDT 2008

Re: No periodic daily?

2009-02-18 Thread Kurt Buff
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Fred Condo hostmas...@quinn.com wrote: At a minimum, we'd want to see the contents of /etc/periodic.conf As I just posted, this looks like an error in my postfix configuration. (as an aside) Any reason you're running an unpatched 7.0 on your router? 7.0 is up

Re: memory limitations per process

2009-02-18 Thread Chris Rees
2009/2/18 af300...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm running into a per process memory limit at work (on Windoze though), but I'm wondering what's the limit per process in FreeBSD for 32 bit systems, ie i386? Is it 4gb or 2? From stuff I found on the Net, I'm guessing 4gb, but wanted to ask anyway. It

Re: No periodic daily?

2009-02-18 Thread Fred Condo
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: All, I'm having a strange issue with one of my boxes. It's the router for our DS3: router#uname -a FreeBSD router.mycompany.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon May 19 01:16:12 PDT 2008

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

2009-02-18 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, GESBBB wrote: I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON.   snippet # See if we are running via CRON     if [ ! -t 0 ]   then # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0 32767     RESTING=$((RANDOM/60))    

Re: Determining process preventing umount of busy partition

2009-02-18 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 06:07:52 Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:30:55 -0900, Mel fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net wrote: This is weird, though. New theories (where are Chase, Cameron and Foreman when you need them!): Spying around in someone else's house. :-) fstat is

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

2009-02-18 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 10:40:47 Warren Block wrote: On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, GESBBB wrote: I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON.   snippet # See if we are running via CRON     if [ ! -t 0 ]   then # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a

How to create statically linked bacula-fd?

2009-02-18 Thread Doug Sampson
We blew up one of our servers recently and we wanted to restore backed-up data from a Bacula storage server. The Bacula recovery process states that one needs to create a statically linked bacula-fd daemon in order to start the recovery process but it does not offer a how-to for FreeBSD systems--

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

2009-02-18 Thread GESBBB
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk GESBBB wrote: | I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON. | | | | # See if we are running via CRON |    if [ ! -t 0 ] |      then | # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

2009-02-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 18, 2009, at 12:29 PM, GESBBB wrote: I am a little confused. I believe the problem is with the if [ ! -t 0 ] statement. I tried to redirect the error message; however, it still appears in the email sent by CRON. I tried using this statement instead: if ( ! tty -s /dev/null ) and if

Re: World doesn't build correctly

2009-02-18 Thread Frank Wißmann
Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 21:20:15 schrieb Polytropon: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann frank.wissman...@web.de wrote: What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I desire? What do I need to change to get my wanted results? Are you sure you have the

FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

2009-02-18 Thread Kailash Kailash
I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2. Here is one real code with binary output. On 3.0 GHz Woodcrest processor, I am able to copy from one cache to another cache at the speed of

Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

2009-02-18 Thread Wojciech Puchar
looks like they improved gcc. you can install older from ports. On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2. Here is one real code with binary

Re: World doesn't build correctly

2009-02-18 Thread Fred Condo
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Frank Wißmann frank.wissman...@web.de wrote: Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 21:20:15 schrieb Polytropon: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann frank.wissman...@web.de wrote: What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I desire?

RE: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

2009-02-18 Thread Kailash Kailash
Can old version of GCC used with BSD 7.0 without facing any compatibility problem? Thanks, Kailash -Original Message- From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:46 PM To: Kailash Kailash Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject:

MEETING

2009-02-18 Thread admin
Estas buscando pareja. http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5QBw0OUwMYCFpMAQ4FVAM%3D -- To unsubscribe from this list visit http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5QBw0OUwwYCFpMAQ4FVAM%3D To update your preferences visit http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5QBw0OUw0YCFpMAQ4FVAM%3D

Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

2009-02-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 03:44 pm, Kailash Kailash wrote: I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2. Here is one real code with binary output. On 3.0 GHz Woodcrest processor, I am able

Re: Problem with dbus and hald on FreeBSD-7.1

2009-02-18 Thread Albert Shih
Le 18/02/2009 à 13:36:59+0530, manish jain a écrit Hi, I installed FreeBSD 7.1 on my system a couple of days back. While the rest of the system works very well, I keep getting the following errors when I start gnome : gnome-keyring-daemon : couldn't allocate secure memory to keep

RE: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

2009-02-18 Thread Wojciech Puchar
you install it from ports and use explicitly, everything else still uses default On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: Can old version of GCC used with BSD 7.0 without facing any compatibility problem? Thanks, Kailash -Original Message- From: Wojciech Puchar

Problems with gnome-keyring-daemon and console-kit-daemon on FreeBSD 7.1

2009-02-18 Thread manish jain
Hi all, I installed FreeBSD 7.1 a few days back along with Gnome. I added dbus_enable=YES and hald_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf to get dbus and hald up and running. Since then, I am getting the following error messages when I start gnome : gnome-keyring-daemon : couldn't allocate secure

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

2009-02-18 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:18:03AM -0800, GESBBB wrote: I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON. ? ? snippet # See if we are running via CRON ??? if [ ! -t 0 ] ? then # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0 32767 ???

Property Update February 2009 - International Property Directory

2009-02-18 Thread International Property Directory
February 2009 - Interest is picking up in select markets Choose Your Language: Ajman - UAE International Property Directory are pleased to announce a FIRST for a FINANCE FACILITY IN AJMAN Goldcrest Properties, one of our recommended developers of note are now

AUDITORIAS DEL ISR, IETU, IVA e IDE

2009-02-18 Thread Leticia Alvarez
AUDITORIAS del ISR, IETU, IVA e IDE Con la = reforma fiscal de 2008 entro en vigor la Ley del IETU ( (Impuesto Empresarial a = Tasa Única). El tiempo transcurre y la autoridad correspondiente se dispone instrumentar actos de fiscalización en materia de IETU , para

Top Posting Mania [was Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow]

2009-02-18 Thread Ian Smith
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:13:08 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: you install it from ports and use explicitly, everything else still uses default On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: Can old version of GCC used with BSD 7.0 without facing any

Re: FreeBSD 7.1: iwi problem with intel 2200 pro wireless card

2009-02-18 Thread Erik Johnson
Hello John, I also have a T42p that I just installed FreeBSD 7.1 onto. I use the Intel 2200BG as well, so hopefully this helps. I noticed on your loader.conf that you have the license at the end of WiFi Config. I placed mine at the beginning. as in the example below. Have you tried loading

Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

2009-02-18 Thread Bsd Lord
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Kailash Kailash kailash.kail...@zscaler.com wrote: I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2. Here is one real code with binary output. On 3.0 GHz Woodcrest

Publicidad

2009-02-18 Thread admin
Clic aqui si no ves la imagen http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR4dAQdFUQNRC1U%3D -- To unsubscribe from this list visit http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5SBAwKVQQYC1BMAQ4FVAM%3D To update your preferences visit http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5SBAwKVQUYC1BMAQ4FVAM%3D --

Re: Top Posting Mania [was Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow]

2009-02-18 Thread Wojciech Puchar
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: Woj, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, seem lately to have been converted to the Micro$oft Outlock-trained style of top-posting, including tail-quoting all sorts irrelevant and repeated trailers etc, after years of your (almost too- :)

Re: Top Posting Mania [was Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow]

2009-02-18 Thread Ian Smith
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote: On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: Woj, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, seem lately to have been converted to the Micro$oft Outlock-trained style of top-posting, including tail-quoting all sorts irrelevant and