On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:40:33 -0600
Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote:
I have the following config:
FreeBSD ppert-zone.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 14
01:44:13 UTC 2010
r...@canopus.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM
i386
it is a vps running via a jail.
2010/7/16 Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com:
In the last episode (Jul 16), Ashish SHUKLA said:
Dan Nelson writes:
In the last episode (Jul 15), Jens Rehsack said:
Hi all,
I detected an issue with getpwent on my FreeBSD test box:
perl -MData::Dumper -e 'my @e = getpwent(); print
Il 07/16/10 00:24, Dan Nelson ha scritto:
In the last episode (Jul 15), Michael Anderson said:
Or, more clearly: Are SATA tape drives supported? I see they are on some
other BSD flavors, but I haven't found any mention in the FreeBSD hardware
compatibility documents.
I see an atapist device
Where is the best place to report problems with kernel panics in FreeBSD
8.0 and to get help?
I posted a message in this mailing list freebsd-questions, but if acutally
never was published (?)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:40:33 -0600
Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote:
I have the following config:
FreeBSD ppert-zone.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 14
01:44:13 UTC 2010
r...@canopus.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM
i386
it is a vps running via a
sudo portsnap fetch update
cd /usr/ports/www/opera
/usr/ports/www/operasudo make install clean
Password:
=== opera-10.10.20091120_2 has known vulnerabilities:
= opera -- Data URIs can be used to allow cross-site scripting.
Reference:
Yesterday, I have written to the maintainer of the Opera port, and he gave me
this link : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148294
The port update is in the pipes ;)
Alexandre.
--- En date de : Ven 16.7.10, zaxis z_a...@163.com a écrit :
De: zaxis z_a...@163.com
Objet: cannot
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:03 AM, n dhert ndhert...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the best place to report problems with kernel panics in FreeBSD
8.0 and to get help?
Have a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
Cheers
I posted a message in this mailing list freebsd-questions, but if
Jens Rehsack writes:
2010/7/16 Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com:
[...]
Try the following patch:
Thanks, I'll try it when I'm on my FreeBSD box.
Can I do this without a full world rebuild? (I do not develop in FBSD
actively).
Otherwise I recommend (the test case was in OP) that someone
On 07/16/10 08:36, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
Jens Rehsack writes:
2010/7/16 Dan Nelsondnel...@allantgroup.com:
[...]
Try the following patch:
Thanks, I'll try it when I'm on my FreeBSD box.
Great \o/
[...]
I had to develop a workaround for all other boxes anyway.
As a workaround you
Jens Rehsack writes:
[...]
I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous.
dangerous ? why ?
You can take a look at
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/REHSACK/DBD-Sys-0.01_01/lib/DBD/Sys/Plugin/Unix/Users.pm
Jens
--
Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9
On 07/16/10 09:12, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
Jens Rehsack writes:
[...]
I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous.
dangerous ? why ?
Because it modifies something - and I might not know the source.
getpwent(3) delivers entries from yp, too (or LDAP) etc. - and
when I call
Jens Rehsack writes:
On 07/16/10 09:12, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
Jens Rehsack writes:
[...]
I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous.
dangerous ? why ?
Because it modifies something - and I might not know the source.
getpwent(3) delivers entries from yp, too (or LDAP) etc.
On 07/16/10 09:59, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
Jens Rehsack writes:
On 07/16/10 09:12, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
Jens Rehsack writes:
[...]
I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous.
dangerous ? why ?
Because it modifies something - and I might not know the source.
getpwent(3)
Jens Rehsack writes:
[...]
You're absolutely right - I never took a deeper look, because I always
was only interested to read the (user|group) data and expected setpwent
to modify such an entry.
Its UNIX :P
A quick look into Stevens Advanced Programming in the UNIX environment
could had
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:17:25 +0530
Ashish SHUKLA ash...@freebsd.org articulated:
I've not used KDE since they released KDE 4, but IIRC, KDE 3.5.x used to have
ACL support integrated in it[1] by default. Are you sure there isn't any such
setting you probably missing during compilation in KDE
Hello all,
Thank you for your response in advance.
I am running i386 FreeBSD 7.2 p4 on an HP DL380 G2. I upgraded from 6.1 p23
in March but the machine was built last fall. I am not at liberty to
upgrade the machine due to its purpose. However I agree it is time. I had
been using
I noticed that the 8.1 release status page hasn't been updated since the
4th. I know the team is very close to the release. The last
indication is that the geom system needs work. Can someone update the
page? I hate to send Is it done yet? sorts of e-mails so I keep
checking the release
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said:
2010/7/16 Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com:
In the last episode (Jul 16), Ashish SHUKLA said:
Well, OP is also invoking 'endpwent()' after every 'getpwent()'
invocation which according to GNU/Linux's glibc and NetBSD's libc (as
OP
On 07/16/10 15:07, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said:
2010/7/16 Dan Nelsondnel...@allantgroup.com:
In the last episode (Jul 16), Ashish SHUKLA said:
Well, OP is also invoking 'endpwent()' after every 'getpwent()'
invocation which according to GNU/Linux's glibc
What ever happened to xchess the gnu-chess engine client? Did it
merge into something else?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 09:47:12AM -0400, Mark Moellering thus spake:
I noticed that the 8.1 release status page hasn't been updated since the
4th. I know the team is very close to the release. The last
indication is that the geom system needs work. Can someone update the
page? I hate to
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said:
On 07/16/10 15:07, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said:
Could you please take a look to my other mail (getgrent related) - there
seems another bug ...
Do you have another one-liner that will reproduce it? A
in message 20100714192246.b4daa560.free...@edvax.de, wrote
Polytropon thusly...
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:06:14 +0300, Odhiambo Washington
odhia...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this the same way the Linux users have it?:-)
I don't think so. The Linux Flash plugin seems to work better on
Linux than it
On 07/16/10 18:13, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said:
On 07/16/10 15:07, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said:
Could you please take a look to my other mail (getgrent related) - there
seems another bug ...
Do you have another
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010
i386
The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation.
Supose I have the following rules:
pass in log inet proto tcp from $int_if to any port 8021
flags S/SA keep state tag test
rule 2
rule 3
Sorry. Forgot to ask:
Will the packet be actually tagged on the first rule, even though rule parsing
continues? will it reach the last rule already tagged?
Thanks again.
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010
i386
The question is about how pf acts
Sorry. Forgot to ask:
Will the packet be actually tagged on the first rule, even though rule parsing
continues? will it reach the last rule already tagged?
Thanks again.
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010
i386
The question is about how pf acts
On 16/07/2010 18:22:04, Mario Lobo wrote:
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT
2010
i386
The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation.
Supose I have the following rules:
pass in log inet proto tcp from $int_if to any port
On Friday 16 July 2010 20:58:31 Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/07/2010 18:22:04, Mario Lobo wrote:
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT
2010 i386
The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation.
Supose I have the following rules:
It is interesting why they are waiting for update if they found
vulnerabilities on June 25th and version 10.11 was out long time ago.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Alexandre L. axel...@ymail.com wrote:
Yesterday, I have written to the maintainer of the Opera port, and he gave
me this link
31 matches
Mail list logo
