On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:18:07AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
DISPLAY is not getting set in a remote shell started by ssh -X.
$ echo $DISPLAY
:0.0
$ ssh -X [server] 'echo DISPLAY=%$DISPLAY%'
DISPLAY=%%
How would I go about debugging this?
DISPLAY _is_ set correctly
Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:06:33 -0500, Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com
wrote:
xauth not in your path?
ssh -Y skips all auth stuff so you don't need xauth; he said that
didn't work either :-(
Well, apparently, even -Y needs xauth (which was not installed
Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:18:07AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
DISPLAY is not getting set in a remote shell started by ssh -X.
...
Have you tried putting:
DISPLAY=:0.0
in ~/.ssh/environment on the machine that's not setting DISPLAY
On 7/11/11 6:49 PM, Unga wrote:
Hi all
I need to implement a transparent load balancing daemon in C.
That is, the daemon accept a TCP connection, get more info from the client,
and forward the communication transparently to another server to handle it.
How this could be implemented on
I've been a GUI man for the last couple of years. Recently I wanted to
change back to the two programs I used most: mutt (email) and slrn
(news) only to find out they were not in ports anymore. Yes I know,
there'se japanese versions, but what ever happened to the 'normal'
programs? Are they
Op 12-7-2011 11:39 schreef Dick Hoogendijk:
I've been a GUI man for the last couple of years. Recently I wanted to
change back to the two programs I used most: mutt (email) and slrn
(news) only to find out they were not in ports anymore. Yes I know,
there'se japanese versions, but what ever
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
From: Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd
Subject: Re: Transparent load balancing
To: Unga unga...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2011, 4:11 PM
On 7/11/11 6:49 PM, Unga wrote:
Hi all
I need to
From: Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com
To: Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Mon, July 11, 2011 1:07:31 PM
Subject: Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect
In the last episode (Jul 11), Michael Sierchio said:
Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Correct. I'm currently on 7-STABLE where it's not yet part of
the base system, but my new 8.2-STABLE also has it in /usr/bin.
I believe it has been introduced with version 8...
It is part of '7.2-RELEASE',
It is not.
--
Christian naddy
Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is
more than one bound to the external interface? A la
nat 123 config if re0.2 log same_ports redirect_port tcp 10.0.0.3:22
102.10.22.1:
?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said:
Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is
more than one bound to the external interface? A la
nat 123 config if re0.2 log same_ports redirect_port tcp 10.0.0.3:22
102.10.22.1:
Yes; the redirect_port syntax
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, d...@safeport.com wrote:
I have a mergemaster question. I assume this is my error but do not see what
I did. I am testing remote update procedures so I started with a 7.0 IS0 and
updated it to 7.4.
My mergemaster.rc has the following directives:
FREEBSD_ID=yes
We're not talking about natd. The question was about the use of ipfirewall nat.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said:
Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is
more than one
In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said:
Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is
more than one bound to the external
14 matches
Mail list logo
