Hi all,
I just updated to 8.2S and zfs v28 and notice strange thing: in the manual i
can read about aclmode but i can not use it in the real life:
# zfs set aclmode=passthrough data/public
cannot set property for 'data/public': invalid property 'aclmode'
Obsolete manual?
Good luck
--
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:34:26 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
ssgriffonuser writes:
My isp is blocking outgoing traffic on port 25.
Yeah, it looks like your right. I never would've considered my ISP
blocking outbound traffic from my home, but I suppose it makes
sense.
Does _not_
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 02:11:55 +0400, Subbsd wrote:
Hi
On 7/19/11, Konrad Heuer kheu...@gwdg.de wrote:
To my mind we'll have to face a rapid
change within the next years, and operating systems of the future might be
Android or IOS or Windows Mobile or something similar which my base on
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:06:04PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
One of the people I know uses this as his work laptop, running Excel,
Powerpoint, Outlook, Word, etc. (Of course, he's not running Android at
that point...) The 'laptop' is a tablet in a case with a bluetooth
keyboard. He uses
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:55:29 -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:21:31 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
This is where we find a dividing line between users who want different
things. Yes, you turn on your Win7 laptop (or wake it up) in a coffee
shop, and it connects automagically
On Thursday 21 July 2011, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
As long as I saw the instructions on building from source they wre
generally all like this:
$ cd /tarball-expanded-0.x.y
$ ./configure
$ make
$ su -
# cd /tarball-expanded-0.x.y
# make install
That important 'su
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:59:29 +0100, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Thursday 21 July 2011, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
As long as I saw the instructions on building from source they wre
generally all like this:
$ cd /tarball-expanded-0.x.y
$ ./configure
$ make
$ su -
# cd
Hi all
How to sync a file on FreeBSD (esp. on 8.1) to disk?
I used fsync(2), but does not immediately flush to disk.
I want my writing to a file (a log file) immediately available to other users
to read.
Best regards
Unga
___
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:44:00 -0700 (PDT), Unga wrote:
How to sync a file on FreeBSD (esp. on 8.1) to disk?
I used fsync(2), but does not immediately flush to disk.
I want my writing to a file (a log file) immediately
available to other users to read.
Maybe you can use system(/bin/sync);
If you used fsync it should write to permanent storage immediately,
and it's no longer the OS' problem. If it's not flushing immediately,
maybe the mystery is at the filesystem level or even hardware, both of
which you didn't provide. When you say 'users' are they looking at the
file via NFS or
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Unga unga...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all
How to sync a file on FreeBSD (esp. on 8.1) to disk?
I used fsync(2), but does not immediately flush to disk.
I want my writing to a file (a log file) immediately available to other users
to read.
It shouldn't matter:
On Fri Jul 22 11, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Unga unga...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all
How to sync a file on FreeBSD (esp. on 8.1) to disk?
I used fsync(2), but does not immediately flush to disk.
I want my writing to a file (a log file) immediately available to
On Friday, July 22, 2011 08:44:00 AM Unga wrote:
How to sync a file on FreeBSD (esp. on 8.1) to disk?
I used fsync(2), but does not immediately flush to disk.
I want my writing to a file (a log file) immediately available to other
users to read.
A file doesn't need to be synced to disk
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:56:42AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
Want it like this? :-) ---http://xkcd.com/416/
That's exactly what I don't want. That is (an exaggeration of) what
NetworkManager is trying to do and, predictably, it fails sometimes, just
as MS Windows' automated network
--- On Fri, 7/22/11, Pieter de Goeje pie...@degoeje.nl wrote:
From: Pieter de Goeje pie...@degoeje.nl
Subject: Re: How to sync a file on FreeBSD?
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Unga unga...@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, July 22, 2011, 7:37 PM
On Friday, July 22, 2011 08:44:00 AM
Unga
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:52:10AM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:06:04PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
One of the people I know uses this as his work laptop, running Excel,
Powerpoint, Outlook, Word, etc. (Of course, he's not running Android
at that point...)
Ever since RELEASE-5.0 man mount_unionfs has contained a section saying
BUGS
THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT
DOESN'T WORK) AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR
SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET.
On the
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:05:59 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
re: TeX and MS Word or OO.o Write
TeX is a print formatting system. MS Word and OO.o Write are very poor
text editors with some very poor facsimiles of print formatting systems
built into them.
(La)TeX is a professional typesetting
This is extremely important, esp. with Softupdates, since fsync() does
not guarantee a flush of all buffers to the medium. In order to
implement a stable queue, it would be best to use a different
filesystem.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Unga unga...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/22/11,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:58:26 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I mean that its primary purpose is to try to guess what the
user wants based on the developers' mental model of what users want, then
tries to make it happen -- and, too often, the developers' mental model
of what users want does not match
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:37:48 -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote:
This is extremely important, esp. with Softupdates, since fsync() does
not guarantee a flush of all buffers to the medium.
But wouldn't sync() (see man 2 sync) make sure that
all buffers, even in regards to soft updates, get
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
But wouldn't sync() (see man 2 sync) make sure that
all buffers, even in regards to soft updates, get
immediately flushed / written?
Apparently not. I think most of Matt Dillon's notes are still relevant.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:06:04PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
On Thu, July 21, 2011 1:11 pm, Chad Perrin wrote:
If all they want is a toy with a Web browser and an email client, I guess
that works for them. I don't
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:58:26 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:56:42AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
Want it like this? :-) ---http://xkcd.com/416/
That's exactly what I don't want. That is (an exaggeration of) what
NetworkManager is trying to do and,
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:25:38 +0400
Pan Tsu iny...@gmail.com wrote:
Christopher J. Ruwe c...@cruwe.de writes:
[...]
In this setup, I should not have any problems. However, I do not
realize (and very much doubt) that I changed anything in the order
of the services (lacking the capability
Hi,
Can it be related to an issue from 2009? I have the same problem when
compiling with WITHOUT_KVM and WITH_INET6 (implicit as WITHOUT_INET6 is not
defined).
See the folling links
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-November/013020.html
Although the code for sio appears to be in 8.2 (or at least cvsup does not
delete) but it does not compile - apparently owing to a missing tty related
library or a version difference.
Since there does not appear to be any likelihood that uart will be fixed, I
figure I will be stuck in 7.4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Dear FreeBSD community,
Yesterday, Karl Berry announced the release of TeX Live 2011:
http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2011-July/029711.html
For those of you who use the official distribution, we arranged
everything so that TeX Live 2011
On Jul 22, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Lars Eighner wrote:
Since there does not appear to be any likelihood that uart will be fixed, I
figure I will be stuck in 7.4 forever. But what does that mean in the not
too distant future when 7.4 is no longer supported? Is there some way to
prepare for that
Hi,
Lets say, theoretically, one wishes to replace a device driver in the FreeBSD
media so that consequent system installs from that media built with the
alternate driver, as opposed to the stock media driver. How would one approach
this task?
==
Vincent (Rick) Miller
Systems Engineer
On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Miller, Vincent (Rick) wrote:
Lets say, theoretically, one wishes to replace a device driver in the FreeBSD
media so that consequent system installs from that media built with the
alternate driver, as opposed to the stock media driver. How would one
approach
On 7/22/2011 1:06 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 22, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Lars Eighner wrote:
Since there does not appear to be any likelihood that uart will be fixed, I
figure I will be stuck in 7.4 forever. But what does that mean in the not
too distant future when 7.4 is no longer supported?
At 17:12 21/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
filezilla, winscp,
FTP and NFSv3 both have
On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Sure-- you could provide fixes for uart yourself, or adequately detailed bug
reports so that whatever the problem is which you see could be worked on by
other people.
I thought this was deja vu all over again. Same issue as in
On 7/22/2011 1:50 PM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 17:12 21/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:06:23PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/22/2011 1:50 PM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 17:12 21/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
On 7/22/2011 3:08 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Basically the same. I don't think it's disk.
Are you able to saturate the ethernet ? Try something like
/usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/netblast/netblast
on the local ethernet and see if you can generate and receive a full
gigabit on the wire
On 7/22/2011 3:08 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Basically the same. I don't think it's disk.
Are you able to saturate the ethernet ? Try something like
/usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/netblast/netblast
on the local ethernet and see if you can generate and receive a full
gigabit on the wire
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:46:06PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/22/2011 3:08 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Basically the same. I don't think it's disk.
Are you able to saturate the ethernet ? Try something like
/usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/netblast/netblast
on the local
On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
3.65 419155.4
Thats 400Mb/s no ? Whats the CPU in this thing ? Also your NIC version
was 7.1.9. RELENG_8 has 7.2.3. Can you try that version if possible ?
So no, I'm not saturating this network. Not even close. I have a
machine with a
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:15:11PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
3.65 419155.4
Thats 400Mb/s no ? Whats the CPU in this thing ? Also your NIC version
was 7.1.9. RELENG_8 has 7.2.3. Can you try that version if possible ?
facepalm I sit
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Michael W. Lucas
mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:15:11PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Will applications such as NFS cut bandwith usage that much?
I have seen similar performance
42 matches
Mail list logo
