On 12/11/11 16:01, Jeffry Killen wrote:
Hello;
I am not new to FreeBSD, but it has been a while since I worked with it.
The last version I obtained from FreeBSD Mall is 7.2. The jewel case
is marked with a date of May 2009, so it is a little behind. But I
expected it
to boot the i386 version
On 11/12/2011 06:01, Jeffry Killen wrote:
So, I installed x-developer and attempted to install Apache from the
included
ports. None of the listed version would install: error code -1.
7.2 is out of support now, see: http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
Inter-alia this means that there
On Dec 10, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:05:05 -0600, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Dec 9, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:38:59 -0600, Ryan Coleman wrote:
It's still not malware, it's bloatware. Why would you
not go to the development
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in doesn't what is expected. you know i want to have a freebsd
Hi
I'm planning to setup a machine wich should provide several versions of
FreeBSD and their respective amd64 and x86 variants. Addtionally the
user should have the option to install the selected os(es) locally.
Currently I'm using pxelinux.0 from syslinux to create a text-based menu
for
On 12/11/11 23:31, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in doesn't what is
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se wrote:
Hi,
Did anyone in the community try to adopt the Entropy Key
http://www.entropykey.com/
for use with FreeBSD?
As a non-programmer I would not even try but perhaps someone with better
skills already did?
FWIW
On 11/12/2011 13:18, Dura Zell wrote:
Is there a way to circumvent the need need of the dhcp option
root-path and set it instead manually via a config file or as
parameter? If not: How can I achieve my goal of pxebooting the different
versions of FreeBSD?
Hi:
No. The only thing you can do is
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 05:35:17PM -0600, ajtiM wrote:
H!
I have fresh installed 9.0-RC3 FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 #0 and I use KDE 4. I like to
install Blender 2.6 but:
Required To Build: lang/python32
Required To Run: lang/python32
Installed Python on the system is 2.7. I don't like to update
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 05:32:00AM -0600, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Dec 10, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:05:05 -0600, Ryan Coleman wrote:
So, wait, Firefox is Malware? Did you notice that with FF4
they changed it so that you didn't get prompted on launch
it
Good day,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD going on a soekris box with an atheros based D-Link
PCI wifi card. I intend to use this combination to bridge a difficult network
back to ethernet but right now I'm just trying to get the soekris associated to
the network. The network is managed by an Apple
On Sunday 11 December 2011 12:31:07 Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 05:35:17PM -0600, ajtiM wrote:
H!
I have fresh installed 9.0-RC3 FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 #0 and I use KDE 4. I like
to install Blender 2.6 but:
Required To Build: lang/python32
Required To Run: lang/python32
Hi Freebsd-questions.
In system two disks now:
# kenv | grep dev
currdev=disk1s1a:
loaddev=disk1s1a:
loader_conf_files=/boot/device.hints /boot/loader.conf /boot/loader.conf.local
vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ad8s1a
kern.devalias.ada0=ad4
kern.devalias.ada1=ad8
one was with installed FreeBSD
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
7.2 is out of support now, see:
http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
Inter-alia this means that there won't be packages available
on the FTP servers specifically for that version ...
What, exactly, _is_ the policy on retention of the
On 11/12/2011 6:21 AM, Robison, Dave wrote:
I prefer having separate partitions because it's more in line with traditional
unix systems, and in particular, I don't like letting users have unlimited
access to /tmp.
Pardon the noob question: will using Disk Quotas work to limit the damage
Hello guys,
I notice FreeBSD is now using (and probably has been for a while) csup
instead of cvsup. The parameters looking identical - at least from the
no-gui perspective.
Can anyone advise what the difference is, and perhaps educate me on how
this came to be?
Thanks.
Hello,
why is that
pkg_add -r x11/kde4 could not install kde4 (404 not found) but
portmaster -P x11/kde4 did, however
portmaster -P xorg didn't install xorg (it just reinstalled some
modules) then pkg_add -r xorg installed it.
I am a bit confused with these.
I was reading this:
On 12/12/11 12:05, Foo JH wrote:
On 11/12/2011 6:21 AM, Robison, Dave wrote:
I prefer having separate partitions because it's more in line with
traditional unix systems, and in particular, I don't like letting
users have unlimited access to /tmp.
Pardon the noob question: will using Disk
Foo JH wrote:
Hello guys,
I notice FreeBSD is now using (and probably has been for a while) csup
instead of cvsup. The parameters looking identical - at least from the
no-gui perspective.
Can anyone advise what the difference is, and perhaps educate me on how
this came to be?
I'm
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:54:25AM +0800, Foo JH wrote:
Hello guys,
I notice FreeBSD is now using (and probably has been for a while) csup
instead of cvsup. The parameters looking identical - at least from the
no-gui perspective.
Can anyone advise what the difference is, and perhaps
Hello,
I am ... stuck.
I've been trying to setup mercurials web frontend with apache,
but apache won't start python.
Not as cgi-script, not with mod_python.
Investigating, I found this not only to be a problem with apache.
Situation now:
Users michael and root can run python.
All others
Michael Powell writes:
Csup is a rewrite of cvsup in the C language, and as such can be
included as part of the base operating system. It is only linked
against a few system libraries. This also means it can be built
using the same tools and system compiler whenever the system
itself
my freebsd is 8.2 and i have four interfaces which two of them are gbeth
and two others are igb. i think the interfaces are ok beacuse when i bridge
two interfaces, it works fine.
i use the below command to create my bridge:
ifconfig bridge0 create
ifconfig bridge0 addm gbeth0 addm igb0 addm igb1
Since this may by of interest to others, including those maintaining ports,
I've just created a dump of the history data for ports and versions reported in
… not the reporting ports is optional, there appears to only be about 10% of
the hosts that report in port information …
The dump is
On 12/12/11 15:49, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
my freebsd is 8.2 and i have four interfaces which two of them are gbeth
and two others are igb. i think the interfaces are ok beacuse when i bridge
two interfaces, it works fine.
i use the below command to create my bridge:
ifconfig bridge0 create
On 12/12/2011 7:39 πμ, Robert Huff wrote:
Michael Powell writes:
Csup is a rewrite of cvsup in the C language, and as such can be
included as part of the base operating system. It is only linked
against a few system libraries. This also means it can be built
using the same tools and
HI, krad.
How I can figure out the correspondence of bios drive number and
freebsd numbering?
Have a look at boot.config file you should be able to do something
there
On Dec 11, 2011 8:57 PM, Kon'kov Evgenij [1]kes-...@yandex.ru
wrote:
Hi Freebsd-questions.
In
27 matches
Mail list logo
