On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
Of course, this is explicit to rather serious production environments.
Desktop and casual usage ... ports may serve you better if you like to stay
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:45:04 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
Is there some way to start firefox3 in a defined geometry, something
like
$ firefox3 -geometry 1024x768
Answer: Yes, but it's not as easy as it could have been.
Unlike nearly every other X11 program, notably the old
and
El día Tuesday, January 10, 2012 a las 09:25:54AM +0100, Polytropon escribió:
Answer: Yes, but it's not as easy as it could have been.
Unlike nearly every other X11 program, notably the old
and outdated ones, Firefox does _not_ seem to support
the _standard_ -geometry WxH+X+Y parameter.
[img_top.gif]
[img_skype_logo.gif]
[img_left_border.gif]
[spacer50.gif]
Dear Skype Member:
As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the
Skype system.We recently contacted you after noticing an issue on your
account
This is the Last reminder to
On 10-01-2012, Tue [08:51:33], n j wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
Of course, this is explicit to rather serious production environments.
Desktop and casual usage ...
On 10/01/2012 09:23, Dmitry Sarkisov wrote:
Would be nice to know if there any plans on switching to pkgng or any other
pkg management
system in a future.
pkgng is under active development with the stated aim of replacing the
current packaging system. If you want to get involved, check out
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, the wise Polytropon wrote:
Does this image boot successfully?
Unfortunately this is also a no go. I think Intel has done something
special to their iso's, considering that I'm missing 7MB of data.
Regards,
Marco
--
Men have as exaggerated an idea of their
rights as
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled
package you got used. While many people want PHP in the
Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peterfb...@peterk.org wrote:
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apache22
pkg_add -r php5
now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm
Op 9-1-2012 23:00, alexus schreef:
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
somewhat limited vs ports...
For example:
I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5,
php5 doesn't have libphp5.so that
On 10-01-2012, Tue [10:16:06], Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 10/01/2012 09:23, Dmitry Sarkisov wrote:
Would be nice to know if there any plans on switching to pkgng or any other
pkg management
system in a future.
pkgng is under active development with the stated aim of replacing the
Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl writes:
Hi,
As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
*You* think it's stupid.
There's not one true way to serve php pages, more and more platforms use
a lightweight httpd daemon like nginx and php-fpm for example.
If you manage many
Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef:
Dick Hoogendijkd...@nagual.nl writes:
Hi,
As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
*You* think it's stupid.
Yes, as I wrote: stupid imo
But thanks again for your reply. You may be right but I still feel it's
better to *have*
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef:
Dick Hoogendijkd...@nagual.nl writes:
Hi,
As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
*You* think it's stupid.
Yes, as I wrote: stupid imo
But thanks
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:56:39PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
And that's just the way it is now. Try replicating the wealth of
information you get in various config files in FreeBSD in a GUI. Just
how hard it is to open a simple text file in an editor and just fracking
do what it tells
Hello,
When upgrading from FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE using freebsd-update,
I'm asked to merge, what seems like, everything in /etc manually.
And all of the merges are trivial version controls lines.
E.g. my /etc/amd.map (which I never modified) begins with:
# $FreeBSD:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peterfb...@peterk.org wrote:
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 22:52, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote:
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apache22
pkg_add -r php5
now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22
`grep php
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the
precompiled package you
On 1/10/12 3:09 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peterfb...@peterk.org wrote:
I
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef:
Dick Hoogendijkd...@nagual.nl writes:
Hi,
As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
*You* think it's stupid.
Yes, as I wrote: stupid imo
But thanks
Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org writes:
Hi,
IMO it's stupid as well and I second Dick's opinion.
You're at least two, great.
The module doesn't hurt anyone, and reduces confusion. I think that
PHP is still more heavily deployed on mod_php than on anything else.
The Apache module should be
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
[...]
Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who
don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache
module* just because they installed PHP.
A possible alternative that would
Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options,
Op 10-1-2012 15:32, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
A possible alternative that would keep everyone happy would be
*another* package that actually includes the module, like for example
a package called mod_php5, it would install the stuff from php5 +
the apache module.
That is the way CentOS
On 1/10/12 4:34 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
[...]
Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who
don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache
module* just because they
On 1/10/12 5:01 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:56:21 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, January 10, 2012 a las 09:25:54AM +0100, Polytropon escribió:
Answer: Yes, but it's not as easy as it could have been.
Unlike nearly every other X11 program, notably the old
and outdated ones, Firefox does _not_
Hello,
I've just updated my laptop from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE, everything
worked but the kernel complains about labels see :
g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed (gp-name=vol/root, error=17)
g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed (gp-name=vol/root, error=17)
g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:56:21 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, January 10, 2012 a las 09:25:54AM +0100, Polytropon escribió:
Answer: Yes, but it's not as easy as it could have been.
Unlike nearly every other X11 program, notably the old
and
El día Tuesday, January 10, 2012 a las 07:27:45PM +0100, Polytropon escribió:
And now back to history. :-)
UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
PDP-11 or K1600? Oh, and EC1056 here (OS/ES SVM OP1). :-)
both, PDP-11 and the clone;
Our clone or
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Mahan
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 4:28 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Problems building world with 9.0 RC3
All,
I am having an issue with
My name is Glen Davenport. I am trying to download freebsd but haven't a
clue as to how the FTP function works.When I go to download I am given a
directory listing. Needless to say, I have never downloaded anything for
UNIX/LIINUX. Can you help?
My e-mail address is gdd80...@gmail.com.
On 01/11/2012 02:25 AM, Glen Davenport wrote:
My name is Glen Davenport. I am trying to download freebsd but haven't a
clue as to how the FTP function works.When I go to download I am given a
directory listing. Needless to say, I have never downloaded anything for
UNIX/LIINUX. Can you help?
I've installed mpd5 and am using it to access a pptp VPN server at
work. I've got the config working but am trying to use the 'set iface
up-script script' function to do some special routing. After the
connection is set, I have these routes:
DestinationGatewayFlags
35 matches
Mail list logo
