On 01/26/2012 01:57 AM, Da Rock wrote:
Despite having similar hardware, you're only real best bet is to suck
it and see. Try installing and seeing what you can get to work
(dmesg, pciconf -lv, usbconfig, kldload modules, questions here, etc).
I've had mixed success with laptops (they're just
Jasper Valentijn wrote:
L.S.,
I'm not able to install FreeBSD on a Sony Vaio vgn-cr31s. The problem
seems to be related to PR kern/153440,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153440cat=.
The FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick.img was used to try the
install and extraction of the
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:53:39 -0600
Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
For the life of me I can't work around this xcb-util issue. This is
a pretty fresh install and I have not made any workaround symlinks.
I ran:
# portmaster -R -r xcb-util-0
And the problem
At this stage, your options appear to be: illumos/OpenIndiana
Not being developed on SPARC
Linux,
AFAIK Gentoo, Funtoo, Debian are the only supporting distros and you will
need to check if sun4v and your machine are supported
NetBSD
Not recommended, sorry to say
or OpenBSD.
Highly
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:08:07 -0600
Doug Poland articulated:
Hello,
I'm trying port some shell scripts to FreeBSD that were originally
written on Darwin (OS X).
The issue I'm having is the shebang line of the scripts in OS X is
#!/bin/sh, and it turns out that is really an instance of
There seems to be an old BUG,
http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-bugs/2006-04/msg00309.html
that has recently been noted on the Postfix forums.
Was this bug ever actually addressed? In other words, is this an
actual bug or is it working as intended? If it is a bug, and since
it is apparently nearly 5
On 01/26/2012 02:05 PM, Anonymous wrote:
NetBSD
Not recommended, sorry to say
Why?
--
Rares Aioanei
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Mike wrote:
I do not have this hardware, so these are just a couple of wild guessses
from the blue on my part. I am also looking only at 64 bit platforms here,
so if there is any signifigant difference with 32 bit I can't look/see.
Just to be on the safe side I've also tried the 9.0 amd64
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 18:54, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 1/25/2012 5:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I have a Huawei E1820
I will also try RTFM.
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
Done, although kldload u3g tells me that file already exists! Perhaps
because
On 1/26/2012 10:58 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
Done, although kldload u3g tells me that file already exists! Perhaps
because I booted up with my Huawei dongle plugged in.
kldstat | grep u3g shows me nothing though.
Looks like
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 19:12, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 1/26/2012 10:58 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
Done, although kldload u3g tells me that file already exists! Perhaps
because I booted up with my Huawei
Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 18:54, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 1/25/2012 5:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I have a Huawei E1820
I will also try RTFM.
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
Done, although kldload u3g
On 1/26/2012 12:00 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi Mike,
I guess the internet.com http://internet.com in
AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\IP\\\,\\\internet.com http://internet.com/\\\ OK \
refer to the APN? I know I need to read ppp.conf again soon :)
Hi,
Yes, thats the APN. Your APN seems to
http://learnpythonthehardway.org/
Pick the format you want.
HTH.
B.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 07:39:40PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
sorry if this is a re-request and a bit OT, but, it's seriously
time i got
Hi all!
I've been away for some time, but I'm now getting back into the full
swing of things.
I'm wondering if there is anyone out there who can let me temporarily
borrow a CLI-only clean install FBSD virtual machine with a publicly
facing IPv4 and native IPv6 address. It will be extremely
You wrote:
On 01/26/2012 02:05 PM, Anonymous wrote:
NetBSD
Not recommended, sorry to say
Why?
Net has support for less sparc64 platforms than OpenBSD or FreeBSD and
NetBSD reliability has gone downhill. I am sad to say it but I think Net's
best days are behind us. I hope I have to eat
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:48:18AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
There seems to be an old BUG,
http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-bugs/2006-04/msg00309.html
that has recently been noted on the Postfix forums.
403 Forbidden
Was this bug ever actually addressed? In other words, is this an
actual bug or is it
I can probably arrange for a tunneled v6 address - should be the same thing at
the end of the day…. how much time/mem you need?
RB
On Jan 26, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi all!
I've been away for some time, but I'm now getting back into the full swing of
things.
I'm
Hi all, first I apologise if this is a known issue, I have been
searching but can't seem to find an answer. I am looking to switch to
FreeBSD full time and this is the only thing holding me back I want to
run XFCE and I know the 4.8 release has some issues with mounting
devices which used to use
Hello all.
I am sorry if this is OFF Topic. I am looking for help from more
experienced people in these areas.
I am looking for a job and one company is looking for people to
create a test team (part of the quality assurance team). Their
projects is based on SAP and Oracle Financials
20 matches
Mail list logo
