Installed Freebsd9.0 along with Apache2.2 ,php5, php5-extensions, perl, and
phpmyadmin
phpmyadmin works fine when i put in the url but if I add a virtual host file
then I get the error can't find phpmyadmin on the server.
What am I missing here?
On 1/30/12 11:40 AM, Darrell Betts wrote:
Installed Freebsd9.0 along with Apache2.2 ,php5, php5-extensions, perl, and
phpmyadmin
phpmyadmin works fine when i put in the url but if I add a virtual host file
then I get the error can't find phpmyadmin on the server.
What am I missing here?
Hi,
When booting my computer today I noticed the message at the end: starting
background filesystem check in 60 seconds. This seems strange to me since
SU+J is enabled on all filesystems. How is this possible? NB running
FreeBSD 9-STABLE
Regards,
Marco
--
In most instances, all an argument
hello,
first i very thanks for you because read my mail...
i install squid 2.7 on FreeBSD 8.2 (width GENERIC kernel + PF + Bridge) and
mark hit object with squid zph_mode , like this:
zph_mode tos
zph_local 0x30
zph_parent 0x0
zph_option 136
but when i run : tcpdump -nvi em1 port
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:17:16 +0100 (CET)
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
When booting my computer today I noticed the message at the end:
starting background filesystem check in 60 seconds. This seems
strange to me since SU+J is enabled on all filesystems. How is this
possible? NB running
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
files remains the same? It means wbserv?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 1/30/12 2:24 PM, Lubomir Matousek wrote:
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
files remains the same? It means wbserv?
You'll want to be more
Hi,
Using v.FreeBSD 8.2, I'm trying to install Firefox 9 by pkg_add -r
firefox. According to the docs, this should work. However, instead of v9
it tries to install v 3.6 which goes wrong because of dependency
conflicts. Any idea on how to solve this or what goes wrong?
Thanks
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:24:08 +0100
Lubomir Matousek wrote:
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed
port files remains the same? It means wbserv?
If you take a
On 30/01/2012 13:57, hvn wrote:
Using v.FreeBSD 8.2, I'm trying to install Firefox 9 by pkg_add -r
firefox. According to the docs, this should work. However, instead of v9
it tries to install v 3.6 which goes wrong because of dependency
conflicts. Any idea on how to solve this or what goes
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:25:42 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 30/01/2012 13:57, hvn wrote:
Using v.FreeBSD 8.2, I'm trying to install Firefox 9 by pkg_add -r
firefox. According to the docs, this should work. However, instead of
v9 it tries to install v 3.6 which goes wrong because of
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:
It should be 9.0-release. I suspect a problem with pkg_upgrade any not
FreeBSD.
Install misc/compat8x and you won't need to upgrade all the ports at once,
they'll still work.
Yes But I want to be able to upgrade the
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Pierre-Luc Drouin pldro...@pldrouin.netwrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Pierre-Luc Drouin pldro...@pldrouin.net
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Pierre-Luc Drouin
pldro...@pldrouin.net wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:58 AM,
On 30/01/2012 14:43, hvn wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:25:42 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 30/01/2012 13:57, hvn wrote:
Using v.FreeBSD 8.2, I'm trying to install Firefox 9 by pkg_add -r
firefox. According to the docs, this should work. However, instead of
v9 it tries to install v 3.6
Hello,
I would like to setup a syslog server inside a jail
I have setup couple of other jail and they are already working as a DNS server
and a HTTP server.
The next step would be to configure a new jail as a syslog server.
I have the following parameters :
jail_enable=YES
On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
Are you running syslogd in the host environment? If so, it's probably
bound to INADDR_ANY and thus pre-empted your jailed syslog from binding
to a network port.
Try adding
Le 30 janv. 2012 à 16:59, Matthew Seaman a écrit :
On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
Are you running syslogd in the host environment?
Yes I am running it both in the host and jail environment.
If so, it's
Hello,
I'm having a problem on a server of mine that is acting as a bridge,
that whenever I download from the server itself it's very slow. From
machines going through it's bridge there are no problems.
When looking for what could be the cause, I had a look at my routing
table and saw the
I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
*portupgrade -PP -a
*portmaster -PP -a
*pkg_update
All fail miserably and totally and have left the system in an unuseable
state.
Why can't FreeBSD just make the package system just
I installed 9.0 on my test ThinkPad. During the boot-up process, I see
the following message after a pause in the boot-up process:
run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for
xpt_config
A quick spin through google showed the message occurred in older
versions of FreeBSD,
Hi there,
does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2
routing protocol in FreeBSD???
I would like to use it to exchange routes with my Cisco 857W router as
the BSD machine will provide routing for a virtual test network in VBox.
I did check out the handbook for the
Thanks Rob...
I put the kernel conf file in the source tree as opposed to linking to
it and it certainly did compile the custom kernel.
What confuses me (not that I expect you to have the answer) is that
Chapter 9 of the handbook has a tip that recommends keeping the kernel
config in
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2 routing
protocol in FreeBSD???
man routed
The routed utility is a daemon invoked at boot time to manage the network
routing tables.
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2
routing protocol in FreeBSD???
man 8 routed
I did check out the handbook for the enable_routerd=YES
I'd try routed_enable = YES instead.
Regards
Éric Masson
--
je crosspost
Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com writes:
Thanks Rob...
I put the kernel conf file in the source tree as opposed to linking to
it and it certainly did compile the custom kernel.
What confuses me (not that I expect you to have the answer) is that
Chapter 9 of the handbook has a tip that
Eric Masson e...@free.fr writes:
Sorry, Followup to myself.
I'd try routed_enable = YES instead.
router_enable = YES as Michael stated in another post.
Regards
Éric Masson
--
et me dis quil y a eu une merde avec le serveur truc machin et que ca a
fait un gros server crash. OU ets la
On 01/30/2012 06:47 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Kaya Samankayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2 routing
protocol in FreeBSD???
man routed
The routed utility is a daemon invoked at boot
On 01/30/2012 06:53 PM, Eric Masson wrote:
Kaya Samankayasa...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2
routing protocol in FreeBSD???
man 8 routed
I did check out the handbook for the enable_routerd=YES
I'd try routed_enable = YES instead.
On 30/01/2012 17:41, Mike. wrote:
I installed 9.0 on my test ThinkPad. During the boot-up process, I see
the following message after a pause in the boot-up process:
run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for
xpt_config
A quick spin through google showed the message
On 1/30/12 2:24 PM, Lubomir Matousek wrote:
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
files remains the same? It means wbserv?
On 30.1.2012 14:52, Damien
On 01/30/2012 07:11 PM, Eric Masson wrote:
Eric Massone...@free.fr writes:
Sorry, Followup to myself.
I'd try routed_enable = YES instead.
router_enable = YES as Michael stated in another post.
Regards
Éric Masson
The generic syntax of rc.conf is like so (using mine as example):
In the Linux NFS server it's permissible to share a directory with
whitespace in the directory name by wrapping the first field in the exports
list with double-quotes. This does not seem to be true with the FreeBSD NFS
server. Is there a way to share a directory with spaces in the name?
Thanks in
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
*portupgrade -PP -a
*portmaster -PP -a
*pkg_update
All fail miserably and totally and have left
Le 30 janv. 2012 à 17:15, bsd a écrit :
Le 30 janv. 2012 à 16:59, Matthew Seaman a écrit :
On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
Are you running syslogd in the host environment?
Yes I am running it both in the host
On 1/30/2012 at 7:26 PM Chris Whitehouse wrote:
|http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=136327
|
|includes a workaround, hopefully it will work for you:
|
|disable firewire (IEEE 1394) in BIOS.
|rebuild kernel with device sbp disabled and install it.
|reboot
|if it works re-enable firewire in
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
*portupgrade -PP -a
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:24:08 +0100
Lubomir Matousek wrote:
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed
port files remains the same? It means wbserv?
On 30.1.2012
You talk a lot about how easy it is to maintain a binary package system.
I would like you to convince me that it is easy, keeping in mind that it
should remain compatible with the ports system. I am willing to be
convinced.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
I wish to use binary packages and I specifically do not want to compile
anything, it tends to take far too long to compile programs and would
rather install some packages and have it all work right away.
That's often true, especially
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary
Dear FreeBSD masters:
I am looking to understand the toolchain that begins with an mdoc-based
manual page and ends with a nice HTML file (as illustrated by
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=groff_mdocapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASEarch=defaultformat=html
).
Hypothetically,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
I wish to use binary packages and I specifically do not want to compile
anything, it tends to take far too long to compile programs and would
rather install some
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
David Jackson wrote:
I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
*portupgrade -PP -a
*portmaster -PP -a
*pkg_update
All fail miserably and totally and have left the system in an
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:02:44 +0100
Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
To put it bluntly
It's the users fault
from my own experience
Apple: just fsck off
Mcrsft and Oracle and whom they have swallowed so far: just
On 30/01/2012 22:04, David Jackson wrote:
Binary packages are a big time saver and are more efficient.
Yes, definitely -- this is true for many use cases. Not all by any
means, but enough that binary packages are a must-have.
It should be easy for FreeBSD to make it easy to install the most
On 2012.01.30 18:40, David Jackson wrote:
Perhaps that is because the people who want to use packages have given up
on FreeBSD.
WTF?!? hint: I'm standing right beside you as you're saying this.
Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:49:46PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
Binary
packages are a big time saver and are more efficient.
More efficient? Depends. In regards of installation, they're
often faster. In regards of spped during operation... well,
depends. :-)
The binary packages are
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:28:28PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
You talk a lot about how easy it is to maintain a binary package system.
I would like you to convince me that it is easy, keeping in mind that it
should remain compatible with the ports system. I am willing to be
convinced.
--
snip
I'd try routed_enable = YES instead.
Regards
Éric Masson
I have now setup a virtual instance of FreeBSD and another machine
running Bind9 on OpenBSD.
I can tell that the system is receiving RIP updates as netstat -r shows
the routes advertised by my router however, it seems that
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:40:50 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
I wish to use binary packages and I specifically do not want to compile
anything, it tends to take far
On 1/30/2012 6:13 PM, freebsd-lists-e...@erikosterholm.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:28:28PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
You talk a lot about how easy it is to maintain a binary package system.
I would like you to convince me that it is easy, keeping in mind that it
should remain
For those on the questions list who would find this interesting.
Original Message
Subject: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:39:30 +0100
From: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
To: curr...@freebsd.org, po...@freebsd.org, ports-annou...@freebsd.org
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 05:44:28PM -0500, Jason Massey wrote:
Dear FreeBSD masters:
I am looking to understand the toolchain that begins with an mdoc-based
manual page and ends with a nice HTML file (as illustrated by
54 matches
Mail list logo
