Le 31/05/2012 ? 11:32:33-0400, Oscar Hodgson a écrit
The subject is pretty much the question. Perhaps there's a better
place to be asking this question ...
We have (very briefly) discussed the possibility of using FreeBSD
pizza boxes as a storage heads direct attached to external JBOD
On 29 May 2012 20:06, phnxcs_...@lycos.com wrote:
Hello,
I am moving away from MS products due to security a nd stability
concerns. Below are the machines I use and would like to know which
version of FreeBSD will work best with each. The computer s are used
at home and away,
On 01/06/2012 00:32, Gene wrote:
Actually, I did just as above except using portmanager.. Tried deleting the
two packages tried again with portmaster. Still no luck. So I deleted them
again and installed from packages. mysql-client-5.4.. installed lib/mysql/
libmysqlclient.so.18, but
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG=Yes
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an error that the user may not set
this.
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen on the
FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install
auditfile.tbz
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
on the FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install
# mount -t ntfs -o ro /dev/da5s1 /mnt
mount_ntfs: /dev/da5s1: Invalid argument
)
your dmesg shows drive is properly detected.
seems like ntfs driver doesn't work OR MBR is't properly handled.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
48TB each, roughly. There would be a couple of units. The pizza
boxes would be used for computational tasks, and nominally would have
8 cores and 96G+ RAM.
Obvious questions are hardware compatibility and stability. I've set
up small FreeBSD 9 machines with ZFS roots and simple mirrors for
I am also in charge of redesigning one of our virtual SAN's to a
FreeBSD ZFS storage system which will run well how many JBOD's can
you fit on the system?? Probably round ~100TB or so.
quite a bit more without buying overpriced things
___
I'm not using as huge a dataset, but I was seeing this behavior as well when
I first set my box up. What was happening was that ZFS was caching *lots* of
writes, and then would dump them all to disk at once, during which time the
computer was completely occupied with the disk I/O.
The
On Thursday 31 May 2012 11:06:24 Thomas Mueller wrote:
I contacted my Internet service provider, Insight Cable, about the problem,
and they need a copy of any message that bounces, so they can see what went
awry.
I had the same problem a while ago with my ISP (Plusnet). Standard response
from
On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
on the FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
pkg_version
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:14:08PM -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
# I think you also need xhci driver in kernel config. xhci is for USB 3.0.
It's there. As I said, using a USB 3 *Stick* works fine. It is recogized as 3.0
and the speed is as expected. It's the *Disk* that is not recognized.
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE (pc-bsd 9.0 actuallly) on amd64 and
I'm using a vpn connexion.
My problem is the enormous speed loss i'm having when I'm using the
vpn connexion.
I have tried Openvpn and mpd5 (with a pptp and l2pt connexion) and the
max speed (according to various speedtests)
vpn connexion.
I have tried Openvpn and mpd5 (with a pptp and l2pt connexion) and the
max speed (according to various speedtests) is 5 to 6MB.
5-6MB = megabytes per second? megabytes per hour? per year?
be more precise.
Without the vpn I'm having 45-50 MB... My vpn service has servers in
I have recompiled the kernel with device ada and put ahci_load=YES in
/boot/loader.conf.
you don't need ada driver for USB disk. anyway you need it for your SATA
disk to make things fast.
and mounting it works. Obviously, for the disk the device nodes aren't
created...
Is there something
Hi Wojciech et al,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
# # mount -t ntfs -o ro /dev/da5s1 /mnt
# mount_ntfs: /dev/da5s1: Invalid argument
# )
# your dmesg shows drive is properly detected.
Yes, but this was only on a USB2 (two) port, and just an auxiliary
On ia64 r231193 I get:
# netstat -r
netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
What's the problem?
Thanks
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On ia64 r231193 I get:
# netstat -r
netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
What's the problem?
Thanks
For jail environment this means that /dev is not mounted.
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
___
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:30:37PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On ia64 r231193 I get:
# netstat -r
netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
What's the problem?
Thanks
For jail environment this means that /dev is not mounted.
I'm sure I've got /dev mounted:
#
Hello.
2012/05/30 17:04:42 +0400 Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
PV xterm works for me in my mutt under tmux, ask me if you need to tweak
locale ( I see his L char with the '/' over it in place, and the cyrilic
letters in my other mail, too )
PV
PV
and definitely do not use it if you will not have regular backups of all
data, as in case of failures (yes they do happen) you will just have no
chance to repair it.
There is NO fsck_zfs! And ZFS is promoted as it doesn't need it.
Assuming that filesystem doesn't need offline filesystem
Assuming that filesystem doesn't need offline filesystem check utility
because it never crash is funny.
zfs scrub...???
when starting means crash quickly?
Well.. no.
Certainly with computers that never have hardware faults and assuming ZFS
doesn't have any software bugs you may be right.
Additionally ZFS works directly at the block level of the HD meaning
that it is slightly different to the 'normal' file systems in storing
information and is also self healing..
doesn't other filesystem work on block level too? if no - then at what
level?
It was my impression that
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Assuming that filesystem doesn't need offline filesystem check utility
because it never crash is funny.
zfs scrub...???
when starting means crash quickly?
Well.. no.
Certainly with computers that never have hardware faults and assuming ZFS
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:05:57 +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
It was my impression that ZFS doesn't actually format the disk as
stores data as raw information on the hard disk directly rather then
using an actual file system structure as such.
In worst... in ultra-worst abysmal inexpected exceptional
level?
It was my impression that ZFS doesn't actually format the disk as
does any filesystem format a disk?
disks are nowadays factory formatted.
filesystem only write data and it's metadata on it.
I really recommend you to get basic knowledge of how (any) filesystem
works.
THEN please
and unbelievable narrow cases, when you don't have or can't
access a backup (which you should have even when using ZFS),
and you _need_ to do some forensic analysis on disks, ZFS
seems to be a worse solution than UFS. On ZFS, you never
can predict where the data will go. Add several disks to
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
I do _not_ want to try to claim a ZFS inferiority due to
missing backups, but there may be occassions where (except
performance), low-level file system aspects of UFS might be
superior to using ZFS.
If you have an operational
As for ZFS being dangerous, we have a score of drive-years with no loss of
data. The lack of fsck is considered in this intelligently written piece
you are just lucky.
before i would start using anything new in such important part as
filesystem, i do extreme test, ssimulate hardware faults,
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Better=random read performance of single drive.
What an entirely useless performance measure! Maybe you should
restrict yourself to
using SSDs, which have rather unbeatable random read performance - the
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
ZFS is somehow in that part similar to Amiga Fast File System. when you
overwrite a directory block (by hardware fault for example), everything
below that directory will disappear. You may not be even aware
Albert,
What are you using for an HBA in the Dell?
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote:
I've Dell R610 + 48 Go Ram, 2x 6 core + 4 * MD1200 (36*3T + 12*2T)
[root@filer ~]# zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
filer 119T
Hi All,
I did not see the Intel 82599ES chipset in the hardware release notes
for 8.3 or 9.0. Are these controllers supported at this time?
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
In the last episode (Jun 01), Wojciech Puchar said:
and unbelievable narrow cases, when you don't have or can't access a
backup (which you should have even when using ZFS), and you _need_ to do
some forensic analysis on disks, ZFS seems to be a worse solution than
UFS. On ZFS, you never
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.comwrote:
I have an HP LaserJet M1212nf MFP, and hplip/hp-setup in FreeBSD finds the
printer all right when connected by Ethernet, but then fails on installing
the required binary plugin. Printer is not detected at all when
On 06/01/12 13:06, Rick Miller wrote:
Thanks, Jack!
Also another support question for the listsIs the Broadcom BCM5719
supported? I can find neither in the hardware notes for 8.3 nor 9.0.
man bge
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On 06/01/12 10:51, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 05/31/12 17:59, Thomas Mueller wrote:
From Gary Aitkena...@dreamchaser.org :
I've got an HP printer directly connected to the local network.
hp-probe finds it:
#hp-probe -bnet
HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 3.12.2)
Printer
On 06/01/12 04:01, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
My goal is to get it recognized on one of the two USB3 ports I have.
All I get there is
Jun 1 11:43:45 hal9000 kernel: ugen4.2:Jmicron Corp. at usbus4
Jun 1 11:43:45 hal9000 kernel: umass0:Jmicron Corp. Usb production, class
0/0, rev 3.00/1.00,
Certainly with computers that never have hardware faults and assuming ZFS
doesn't have any software bugs you may be right.
That was part of their assumption. It's based on server grade hardware and
ECC RAM, and lots of redundancy.
They missed the part about their code not being perfect.
Thanks, Michael!
I took a look at the manpage and it does appear that it is supported
by the bge driver. It also states that the 572x controller is also
supported, but I heard a rumor stating that the BCM5720 in particular
did not work even though the manpage indicates it is supported. I was
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:45 -0700, Rick Miller wrote:
BCM5720
I haven't gotten this working on my Dell R620 via bge(4), but we are
actively working on it.
Sean
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I run this Ruby script 24/7 (records data from this live stream). It runs
inside a screen though, so it's easy to check in on it every once in a
while.
But how do I crontab the screen with the script inside it? It has to be
with a don't run it if it's already running check.
So far I have this
Hi,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 20:55:00 +0200
Dwayne Henderson its.code.in.h...@gmail.com wrote:
DH I run this Ruby script 24/7 (records data from this live stream).
DH It runs inside a screen though, so it's easy to check in on it
DH every once in a while.
DH
DH But how do I crontab the screen with
On 05/31/12 16:16, Polytropon wrote:
Impedance and level mismatch would be the typical reason
for this. But basically, it's not _much_ worse than using
an internal analog connection.
Probably ok if you soldered it up so you didn't have the mismatch from crappy
high impedance plug-in
On Friday 01 June 2012 04:25:12 Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
on the FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry
On Friday 01 June 2012 03:29:40 Thomas Mueller wrote:
I ddon't see any advantage in FreeBSD 8.x or earlier.
Well, I still see complains about a few quirks in 9 here in the list,
specially after certain src updates.
Re:Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148
Re: kern/168190:
On 06/01/12 00:00, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG=Yes
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an
Warren Block wrote:
[dd]
I have not done any tricky partition alignment, do I really need to? Is
anything else advisable?
If it's not aligned, there can be a pretty significant performance
drop. Please show the output of 'gpart show' on that drive if it's GPT
(gpart show ada0) or
I have installed 9.0-RELEASE on this motherboard with the following
brief results:
$ cat /dev/sndstat
FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64)
Installed devices:
pcm0: HDA Realtek ALC892 PCM #0 Analog (play/rec) default
pcm1: HDA Realtek ALC892 PCM #1 Analog (play/rec)
pcm2: HDA
50 matches
Mail list logo
