2. It looses one of the HDDs during intensive read/write operations:
Jun 2 00:55:33 vas kernel: ahcich1: Timeout on slot 4 port 0
Jun 2 00:55:33 vas kernel: ahcich1: is cs 00c0 ss 00f0 rs
00f0 tfd c0 serr cmd c617
Jun 2 00:56:48 vas kernel: ahcich1: Timeout
When I say fast that's mean I already do some benchmarks with iozone. And
do some graphs to see what the performance are.
What I can say is it's go lot faster than H700+ 12 disk 600 15k/min.
i asked if it is faster than properly made UFS/gmirror/gstripe mix on the
same hardware.
And I do
On the other hand, even on a single-disk pool, ZFS stores two copies of all
metadata, so the chances of actually losing a directory block are extremely
remote. On mirrored or RAIDZ pools, you have at least four copies of all
metadata.
i can only wish you to be lucky. sometimes lack of
seems you like to incredibly complicated things.
It just happens that i configured that printer in one office and there is
NO NEED for this windows-style crappy shit from HP.
/usr/ports/print/hplip (make config and disable GUI trash) is enough.
scanning works directly to SMB exported shares
I have another storage server named bd3 that has a RAIDz2 array of 2.5T
drives (11 of them, IIRC) but it is presently powered down for maintenance.
seems you don't need performance at all if you use RAIDz1/2 and ZFS.
unless performance for you means how fast 1GB file are read linearly.
Hello Jens!
Nice. But what to do if the machine reboots or whatever. Would you crontab
your new Irssi alias?
--Dwayne
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Jens Jahnke jan0...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 20:55:00 +0200
Dwayne Henderson its.code.in.h...@gmail.com wrote:
DH I run this
Well, I still see complains about a few quirks in 9 here in the list,
specially after certain src updates.
Re:Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148
Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment
handling?)
Re: ULE/sched issues on stable/9 -
From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
seems you like to incredibly complicated things.
It just happens that i configured that printer in one office and there is
NO NEED for this windows-style crappy shit from HP.
/usr/ports/print/hplip (make config and disable GUI trash) is
Hello Dwayne,
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:59:09 +0200
Dwayne Henderson its.code.in.h...@gmail.com wrote:
DH Nice. But what to do if the machine reboots or whatever. Would you
DH crontab your new Irssi alias?
I'm not sure. On my remote box I usually start irssi by hand because it
only ceases if the
that's all. Work for whole office without trash software installed on
(windoze) workstation or unix server.
___
Your message is worth saving, gives me some new ideas on getting that
recalcitrant printer (HP M1212nf MFP) to work.
if you want mail
I suppose if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
I have FreeBSD 8.2_RELEASE i386 on an old computer, pinched for disk space and
only 256 MB RAM, won't try upgrading in place.
On the new computer, after not being able to boot NetBSD most of the time and
never getting to a graphical interface,
Any comments on this though?
*/10 * * * * lockf -t 0 /home/anonymous/.myscript.lock
/usr/local/bin/screen -dm /home/anonymous/.rvm/rubies/
ruby-1.9.3-p0/bin/ruby /home/anonymous/myscript.rb
Thanks for the help!
--Dwayne
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Jens Jahnke jan0...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 14:08:49 +0200
Dwayne Henderson its.code.in.h...@gmail.com wrote:
DH Any comments on this though?
DH
DH */10 * * * * lockf -t 0 /home/anonymous/.myscript.lock
DH /usr/local/bin/screen -dm /home/anonymous/.rvm/rubies/
DH ruby-1.9.3-p0/bin/ruby /home/anonymous/myscript.rb
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Warren Block wrote:
Thank you very much for the useful tips. One more question regarding
SSD. The FreeBSD installer enabled journaled soft-updates on the
filesystem which resides on the SSD. Is it good, bad or irrelevant for
the SSD ?
Mostly
I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress when
one does larger updates like the newly recommendation in
/usr/ports/UPDATING
portmaster -r png-
I myself have three machines with different capacity when it comes to
building ports.
How about a knobb one could choose
filesystem which resides on the SSD. Is it good, bad or irrelevant for
the SSD ?
Mostly irrelevant, I think. I've been using just ordinary soft updates as
there is bug fixing going on with SU+J. fsck on the SSD is very fast anyway,
so SU+J is needed less. And there's a little less writing
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
2. It looses one of the HDDs during intensive read/write operations:
Jun 2 00:55:33 vas kernel: ahcich1: Timeout on slot 4 port 0
Jun 2 00:55:33 vas kernel: ahcich1: is cs 00c0 ss 00f0 rs
00f0 tfd c0 serr cmd c617
Jun 2
On 06/02/2012 06:59 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Because... at some point it may return to normal without all the
bikeshedding and, I run because, I don't run because.
The previous threads before this message should have been on a web form
or questions@ as they are completely out of control.
On 6/2/2012 8:09 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress
Portmaster already has that if you're building in a terminal window,
look in the titlebar. I can take a look at printing that in line if
you're not in a terminal window though.
hope this
Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Because... at some point it may return to normal without all the
bikeshedding and, I run because, I don't run because.
Agreed ! Many replies were sent to Wrong lists.
Original poster respondents abused stable@ questions@
Cross posting 2 lists un-necessarily,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:26:21PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
...
# When I plug it to one of the two USB3.0 ports (using the xhci driver), I
# don't get device nodes in /dev created for it, but instead an ever
# growing list of
#
# ugen4.2: Jmicron Corp. at usbus4
# umass2: Jmicron
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Because... at some point it may return to normal without all the
bikeshedding and, I run because, I don't run because.
Agreed ! Many replies were sent to Wrong lists.
Original poster
Hello.
2012/06/02 23:40:25 +0700 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
VS What video card would the collective mind of FreeBSD users recommend?
VS I'm not a gamer, this box runs FreeBSD only with a recent xorg, I
VS often watch movies on it.
I'd try with
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Because... at some point it may return to normal without all the
bikeshedding and, I run because, I don't
On 06/02/12 12:07, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
I am using a MSI N210 w/ FreeBSD 9-Stable.
Seems to work Ok.
Tom Dean
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:07:45 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
2012/06/02 23:40:25 +0700 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
VS What video card would the collective mind of FreeBSD users recommend?
VS I'm not a gamer, this box runs FreeBSD only with a
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:07:45 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
2012/06/02 23:40:25 +0700 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
VS What video card would the collective mind of FreeBSD users recommend?
VS I'm not a
This thread confused me. Is the conclusion of this thread that ZFS is slow and
breaks beyond recovery? I keep seeing two sides to this coin. I can't decide
whether to use ZFS or hardware RAID. Why does EMC use hardware RAID?
-Simon
___
On 06/02/12 02:29, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
seems you like to incredibly complicated things.
No, but it does seem like I did, hopefully unnecessarily...
Thanks.
/usr/ports/print/hplip (make config and disable GUI trash) is enough.
...
printing works fine with this lpr filter
#!/bin/sh
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:08:55 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
I've deinstalled cups and its dependencies and rebuilt only hpijs.
You could have kept it installed (maybe some ports will want
it as a dependency), just disable it in /etc/rc.conf.
lpr works to the printer for the simple demo text
This thread confused me. Is the conclusion of this thread that ZFS is slow
and breaks beyond recovery?
I've personally experienced no problems with ZFS. The performance has been on
par with UFS as far as I can tell. Sometimes it's a little faster, sometimes a
little slower depending on the
--As of June 2, 2012 6:32:39 PM -0400, Simon is alleged to have said:
This thread confused me. Is the conclusion of this thread that ZFS is
slow and breaks beyond recovery? I keep seeing two sides to this coin. I
can't decide whether to use ZFS or hardware RAID. Why does EMC use
hardware RAID?
Hi,
On 02 June 2012 AM 11:25:52 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Thank you very much .
this is the same what I new comer from Windows will say after getting responses
like this.
He will then take out his Windows
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
I will agree that ZFS could use a good worst-case scenario 'fsck' like tool.
Worst-case scenario? That's when fsck doesn't work. Quickly followed
by a sinking feeling.
ZFS can be a complicated beast: It's not the best choice
2012-06-02 19:18, Doug Barton skrev:
On 6/2/2012 8:09 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress
Portmaster already has that if you're building in a terminal window,
look in the titlebar. I can take a look at printing that in line if
you're
35 matches
Mail list logo
