On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:00:11 +0300 (EEST), Ivan Ivanov wrote:
Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9)
is it posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161
217 whit this specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and
5gb HDD
It is very well possible,
1. You won't be able to build things from source on that
machine. Consider using packages for installation, or a
second system to build and export (via NFS) the data required.
You can but... too slow
3. For using your applications within the GUI, choose a
good window manager, e. g. FVWM or
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:00:11 +0300 (EEST), Ivan Ivanov wrote:
Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9)
is it posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161
217 whit this specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and
5gb HDD
Polytropon free...@edvax.de
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 04:05:36 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote:
On part 1, it might be possible to build things on the old
machine, but only little things.
It _will_ work, it just will take some time. If that isn't
a major concern -- no problem. If the machine is low on RAM,
there should at least be
Tnx!
Worked like a charm, with skipped init and other checks, just the
control point parts:
...
int optval=1;
setsockopt(root_socket, IPPROTO_IP, IP_RECVDSTADDR,
optval, sizeof(optval))
...
char t[200];
unsigned int sender_len;
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Hi,
Reference:
From: Carsten Mattner carstenmatt...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 00:28:32 +0200
Message-id:
cacy+hvpb08w4bjgucjb1ghvf-jgpzs0869qvxfryrtxef91...@mail.gmail.com
Carsten Mattner
Hi,
the manpage says for ``gmirror label'':
The order of components is important,
because a component's priority is based on its position
(starting from 0 to 255).
so I would expect to have different priorities for the components,
yet both are listed with a priority of
I am running FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE amd64. I continually see this error
message in the /var/log/messages file:
(npviewer.bin): syscall pipe2 not implemented
The program crashes continually also. I have tried doing an RR without
favorable results. Does anyone have any idea what the problem might be
Hi All,
Installing FreeBSD 8.x I select A at the fdisk partition editor to
use the entire disk. It creates an unused slice with offset 0 and 63
sectors in size. Then partition 1 starts at sector 63 and utilizes
the remaining disk space. Does sysinstall's diskPartitonEditor macro
automatically
Carmel writes:
I am running FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE amd64. I continually see this
error message in the /var/log/messages file:
(npviewer.bin): syscall pipe2 not implemented
The program crashes continually also. I have tried doing an RR
without favorable results. Does anyone have any
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am running FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE amd64. I continually see this error
message in the /var/log/messages file:
(npviewer.bin): syscall pipe2 not implemented
The program crashes continually also. I have tried doing an RR without
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:27:44PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 22:34:21 +0200
Actually Opera already has a setting: Enable plug-ins only on
demand (under preferences-advanced-content). It disables all
plugins by default and you can click on an individual placeholder to
enable a
I am running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE (64 bit), with a VirtualBox VM also
running the same.
On the host I am running NFS server:
$ showmount -e
Exports list on localhost:
/usr/home Everyone
But when I try to mount is on the client (the VM guest) I get this:
# mount
automatically start partitions at head boundaries? The reason I ask
is because I am most familiar with sector 64 being the start of a head
boundary as opposed to 63. Is my understanding incorrect?
yes. 63 is normal.
Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated to FreeBSD
Not had tme to pursued it though.
I dont feel like exporting that data public
in case its already gone too far.
You don't have to export it at all.
Can you confirm the data within is the same as say the same
file in /etc or ~/.ssh? If that's really the case, it's a problem.
the real problem
On 7/6/2012 11:43 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
automatically start partitions at head boundaries? The reason I ask
is because I am most familiar with sector 64 being the start of a head
boundary as opposed to 63. Is my understanding incorrect?
yes. 63 is normal.
Anyway just don't make slices
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Not had tme to pursued it though.
I dont feel like exporting that data public
in case its already gone too far.
You don't have to export it at all.
Can you confirm the data within is the same as say the
On 07/06/2012 06:03 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
I am running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE (64 bit), with a VirtualBox VM also
running the same.
On the host I am running NFS server:
$ showmount -e
Exports list on localhost:
/usr/home Everyone
But when I try to mount is on the
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:42:02 -0400, kpneal wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:03:27PM +, Walter Hurry wrote:
I am running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE (64 bit), with a VirtualBox VM also
running the same.
On the host I am running NFS server:
$ showmount -e Exports list on localhost:
/usr/home
Ryan Coleman writes:
Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated
to FreeBSD
Except for swap, right?
Why do you say that?
Robert huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:55:27 +0200, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Are you root when mounting on the client?
From looking at your prompt # I think you are, but I ask just to make
sure.
You can also take a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-
nfs.html
in the
On 07/06/2012 07:28 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Ryan Coleman writes:
Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated
to FreeBSD
Except for swap, right?
Why do you say that?
Robert huff
I think Ryan means partition and not
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Ryan Coleman edi...@d3photography.com wrote:
Sector 64 is sector 63 when you start at 0.
OMG, so right...I cannot believe that went over my head! Thanks for
pointing it out. It lets me know that diskPartitionEditor is
automatically selecting start and end
Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated to FreeBSD
Except for swap, right?
wrong.
i said slices (==DOS/Windoze MBR partitions), not disklabel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I think Ryan means partition and not slice?
I would not recommend no slices at all, It's deprecated to use dangerously
dedicated disks
Starting with 9 I don't see slices in mount ouput anymore but still there are
FreeBSD partitions in slices (which is a partitions in dos terms)
Example / is
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
Hi,
the manpage says for ``gmirror label'':
The order of components is important,
because a component's priority is based on its position
(starting from 0 to 255).
so I would expect to have
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:47:27 +0200, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 07/06/2012 07:28 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Ryan Coleman writes:
Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated
to FreeBSD
Except for swap, right?
Why do you say that?
On 07/06/2012 07:25 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:55:27 +0200, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Are you root when mounting on the client?
From looking at your prompt # I think you are, but I ask just to make
sure.
You can also take a look at
On 07/06/2012 08:25 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:47:27 +0200, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 07/06/2012 07:28 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Ryan Coleman writes:
Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated
to FreeBSD
Except for swap, right?
Why do
[snip]
I think Ryan means partition and not slice?
I would not recommend no slices at all, It's deprecated to use
dangerously dedicated disks
First of all, it's dedicated disks, there's nothing dangerous
related. :-)
If you are using the MBR approach (old way), you can do
either creating
On 6 July 2012 11:44, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com wrote:
Thanks for this explanation.
Is there any performance advantage to using a dedicated disk layout
over the old way of creating a slice and having your partitions within
it?
Slices isn't the old way. There is no perf advantage
Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9) is it
posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161 217 whit this
specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and 5gb HDD
I've been using even slower Thinkpads (300MHz), there are a few things
to be aware of.
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:58:03 -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 6 July 2012 11:44, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com wrote:
Thanks for this explanation.
Is there any performance advantage to using a dedicated disk layout
over the old way of creating a slice and having your partitions within
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
Slices isn't the old way. There is no perf advantage for dedicated
disks. Maybe you get a
few kb of extra space. Don't do it.
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/faq/09.03.shtml
That is EXTREMELY old advice. The general
On 07/06/2012 09:06 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
Slices isn't the old way. There is no perf advantage for dedicated
disks. Maybe you get a
few kb of extra space. Don't do it.
I went through this exercise to determine if there were boundary
issues installing FreeBSD on disks. I concluded that FreeBSD was
indeed installing at head boundaries. A colleague then pointed me to
http://ivoras.net/blog/tree/2011-01-01.freebsd-on-4k-sector-drives.html
which calls into question
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Polytropon wrote:
For maximum security, you can use the old approach of
using fdisk + disklabel (creating slice, creating partitions
within slice). This also delivers most compatibility for
other systems, if it should be needed, e. g. in a multiboot
environment.
gpart(8)
37 matches
Mail list logo
