I was just trying some proof of concept testing to see if I could get a
system booting with no local disk using iSCSI running from my FreeNAS
box.
I got started, by first booting a 9.1-RC1 CD, into live CD, created a
/tmp/iscsi.conf used kldload to load the iscsi initiator, connected to
the
mer...@stonehenge.com schreef op :
Stas == Stas Verberkt lego...@legolasweb.nl writes:
Stas On a side note, using Git does mean that everyone has to
download a complete
Stas repository. This makes using a csup-like architecture quite
Stas heavy-weight.
The entire history of the Linux kernel
thank you a lot Steve;
it's worked very well.
Best regards
2012/9/18 Steve O'Hara-Smith at...@sohara.org
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:25:03 +
ahmed elouadrhiri ahmedelouadrh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all;
i tried to install yuma in freebsd by the command : make freebsd=1
and it give me
I have or had a problem with a file system (FreeBSD UFS2) messed up, either by
errant software or system freeze/crash.
I successfully cross-compiled, from FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE, a NetBSD 5.1_STABLE
i386 system to install on 8 GB USB stick.
I have both the NetBSD system source as well as pkgsrc
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:05:06 -0400
Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com wrote:
THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 7584318, 7584319,
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
1475900 files,
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:05:06 -0400
Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com wrote:
Script started on Wed Sep 19 04:15:02 2012
fsck_ffs /dev/ada0p9
just to make sure: the partition was not mounted when you started fsck?
Now I wonder if the file system is really fixed, with possibly some
2012-09-19 07:23, saeedeh motlagh skrev:
thanks Bernt, i deinstall it and then try startx. startx works and
displays graphical page. but when i restart me system i do not have
desktop yet.
you know, startx displays graphical page when fbdev is installed too.
please let me know if you have any
On Tue 2012-09-18 (23:31), Gareth de Vaux wrote:
Looking at /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk and /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk -
bins and libs get installed with schg if PRECIOUSPROG and PRECIOUSLIB are
set respectively in their makefiles, both of which can be overridden by
setting NO_FSCHG,
Folks,
Seems that those (like me) concerned about 9.1 release branch activity
not having been exported to CVS, requiring moving to SVN and abandoning
c*sup source updating 'all of a sudden', can relax migration schedules a
bit, for now .. though it's been a good 'gee-up' for me, at least.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, pete wright wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
csup updates just the files that have changed without all the overhead.
svn
export can get a copy of all
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Stas Verberkt lego...@legolasweb.nl wrote:
Jerry schreef op :
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:00:08 -0700
Michael Sierchio articulated:
We are really behind the curve here. Git assumes (correctly) that
disk space is inexpensive, much cheaper per byte than network
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with
local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the
ports tree.
PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with using SVN for src, and portsnap for
ports?
Walter Hurry writes:
PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with using SVN for src, and
portsnap for ports?
_Wrong_? Nothing.
But a lot of people like the idea of using the same tool to
solve nearly identical problems.
Your experience may diverga.
Hi list!
I must warn you, I'm quite new to FreeBSD (I'm mostly using Linux
otherwise). I have inherited an old (yes, very old) BSD 4.7 machine on
my work that I need to clone. I've setuped an identical copy of the
slices on the target machine, ran dump the source machine and restore
on the target
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:28:30 +0200, Fritiof Hedman wrote:
Hi list!
I must warn you, I'm quite new to FreeBSD (I'm mostly using Linux
otherwise). I have inherited an old (yes, very old) BSD 4.7 machine on
my work that I need to clone. I've setuped an identical copy of the
slices on the
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with
local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the
ports tree.
PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with
On 19 September 2012 23:37, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:28:30 +0200, Fritiof Hedman wrote:
Hi list!
I must warn you, I'm quite new to FreeBSD (I'm mostly using Linux
otherwise). I have inherited an old (yes, very old) BSD 4.7 machine on
my work that I need to
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with
local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the
ports tree.
PMFJI.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:22:20 +0200, Fritiof Hedman wrote:
On 19 September 2012 23:37, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:28:30 +0200, Fritiof Hedman wrote:
Hi list!
I must warn you, I'm quite new to FreeBSD (I'm mostly using Linux
otherwise). I have inherited an
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:18:02 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
I also find portsnap slower than either
csup or svn.
That surprises me. Once the initial download and extract is done, I find
portsnap fetch update to be miles faster than csup. However, each to
his own, I suppose.
- Original Message -
From: dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net
To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 1:53 AM
Subject: Anyone Tried to use iPXE to boot with iSCSI?
I was just trying some proof of concept testing to see if I could get a
I just discovered a knowledge deficiency on my part that
I can't seem to resolve.
If one writes a loop of the following form:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
ls -LF |grep \/ /tmp/files
while read dirname; do
cd $dirname
#Do whatever commands to be repeated in each directory.
done
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:03:11 -0500 Martin McCormick wrote:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
ls -LF |grep \/ /tmp/files
while read dirname; do
cd $dirname
#Do whatever commands to be repeated in each directory.
done /tmp/files
How about:
ls -LF | grep \/ | while read dirname; do
cd $dirname
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:03:11 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
I just discovered a knowledge deficiency on my part that
I can't seem to resolve.
If one writes a loop of the following form:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
Just a sidenote: If you're not using bash-specific functionality
and
24 matches
Mail list logo
