On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:43:43 -0600
Jonathan P chavode...@hotmail.com wrote:
hello everyone, i need to establish a connection between 2 freebsd
systems, but i have to this over a serial line, any advices? thank you
all so much!
It's been a long time - but this should help.
On 16/12/2012 07:13, Michael Powell wrote:
With that said, the ports tree usually lives under /usr/ports. No idea why
it would show up under /opt, except as some carry over Linuxism. You
probably need to wipe the Linuxism and start over as a FreeBSD user.
It's unorthodox, but you should
On 16/12/2012 06:51, Oleg simonoff wrote:
Want to to ask the unix community about my problem. Don`t know what to
do.
racking my brain over ...
The system freeBSD 8.2
Got some trouble with compilation portupgrade-2.4.9.9,2
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade sudo make install
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:00:51 -0500
Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 05:35 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I'm running amd64 and it seems rock-solid and well supported.
I had a similar question. I wanted to know if there are issues for
audio, when using 64 bit and got this reply:
If you do not have a _specific_ requirement for 32 bit, use
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 18:45 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
flash
For Linux there are no issues with the proprietary 64 bit flash, but
there will be no new versions of Flash any more for Linux. If FreeBSD
should use the Linux version, than Flash in the near future either way
won't work any more.
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:05:47 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 18:45 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
flash
For Linux there are no issues with the proprietary 64 bit flash, but
there will be no new versions of Flash any more for Linux. If FreeBSD
should use the Linux version,
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 02:13:52 -0500, Michael Powell wrote:
Oleg simonoff wrote:
Hi to all!
Want to to ask the unix community about my problem. Don`t know what
to do.
racking my brain over ...
The system freeBSD 8.2
Got some trouble with compilation portupgrade-2.4.9.9,2
Здравствуйте, Fajar.
Вы писали 16 декабря 2012 г., 14:28:34:
FAN On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Eugen Konkov kes-...@yandex.ru wrote:
AD Eugen Konkov wrote:
Building freeradiusd on
# uname -a
FreeBSD aki 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jun 13 13:46:00 EEST
2012
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 05:35 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I'm running amd64 and it seems rock-solid and well supported.
I had a similar question. I wanted to know if there are issues for
audio, when using 64 bit and got this reply:
If you do not
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:48:40 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Specific requirements _could_ be wine and nVidia's proprietary GPU
driver, as far as I know. - Polytropon (Btw. thank you Polytropon :)
I'm using amd64 on an Atom/ION box here, the Nvidia binary drivers
Hello All,
This is not a question strictly on FreeBSD. But since freebsd-questions
is a lot quicker with its dependable responses, I decided to post my
question here.
Under /lib I have both versions - shared (libxyz.so.1) as well as static
(libxyz.a) - of a library. How do I tell make to
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:52:05 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
Under /lib I have both versions - shared (libxyz.so.1) as well as static
(libxyz.a) - of a library. How do I tell make to link to the static
version, not the shared one ? The next obvious question is how to do the
vice versa - tell make
On 16/12/2012 17:22, Manish Jain wrote:
Under /lib I have both versions - shared (libxyz.so.1) as well as static
(libxyz.a) - of a library. How do I tell make to link to the static
version, not the shared one ? The next obvious question is how to do the
vice versa - tell make to link to the
On 12/16/12 11:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook,
On 12/16/12 04:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook,
On 16-Dec-12 23:12, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/12/2012 17:22, Manish Jain wrote:
Under /lib I have both versions - shared (libxyz.so.1) as well as static
(libxyz.a) - of a library. How do I tell make to link to the static
version, not the shared one ? The next obvious question is how to do the
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:13:36 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 12/16/12 07:08, Polytropon wrote:
And if you're using Firefox, there are plugins available that
allow you to download video content instead of dealing with the
Flash player the site wants you to use.
and the recommended one is?
Following-up on myself...
Of course Steve's suggestion was not what I wanted to hear, as I wanted
to do stuff myself :)
The take-away is that my plan works. I have a full write up in French at
http://tar-jx.bz/notes/tunnels-ipv6.html ; I can translate into
English if people are interested.
Polytropon wrote:
[snip]
Stop in /opt/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade.
^^
Don't know if this matters, never tried it that way - this is FreeBSD,
not Linux. FreeBSD is not some kind of Linux.
With setting $PORTSDIR it should be possible to have a valid (!)
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:00:51 -0500
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 ... nvidia-kmod are the minimal ones I need]) the
main reason for asking is PAE seems to be broken now
The last I heard the nvidia driver wasn't
I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 in a Proxmox KVM, using qemu-kvm 1.3,
but the boot process is hanging:
pbib0: matched entry for 0.1 INTA
pbib0: slot 1 INTA hardwired to IRQ 9
ioapic0: Changing polarity for pin 9 to low
found - vendor=0x1013, dev=0x00b8, revid=0x00
domain=0,
I have a ServeRAID M5014 SAS/SATA Controller in a server and have just
put an M5000 Series Battery directly onto the card.
I was just expecting the battery to charge and be able to see it, but
no joy after a few days and a restart. As far as I am aware, the
battery should just be detected. What
Since partitioning didn't work with FreeBSD 9.0 64bit, I tried PC-BSD
8.2 64bit and partitioning worked.
I had PC-BSD installed on ada0s1, this was the fstab:
/dev/label/rootfs0 / ufs rw,noatime
1 1
/dev/label/swap0none
Screenshots from Linux's GParted:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-12172012-012707am.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-12172012-014310am.php
Perhaps somebody can exactly write the steps I have to do, to install
FreeBSD on /dev/sda1.
I guess a swap and / is enough, but swap, /,
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:05:00 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I startet the FreeBSD installer, chose the shell and then run:
# mount -t ufs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
# cd /mnt
# rm -r *
# rm -r .*
That worked? I can hardly understand why /dev/ad0s1 is
mountable (except it's /dev/ad0s1c, i. e. you've
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:54:59 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Screenshots from Linux's GParted:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-12172012-012707am.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-12172012-014310am.php
Judging from the screenshots, /dev/sda1 = /dev/ad0s1, a
DOS primary partition,
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 02:17 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:05:00 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
ada0 298 GB MBR
ada0s1 57 GB freebsd
ada0s2 240 GB EBR
[snip]
gpart show also doesn't display the 3 ufs and the swap any more.
Did it previously show them?
Yes, they
...
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 02:17 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:54:59 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Screenshots from Linux's GParted:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-12172012-012707am.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-12172012-014310am.php
Judging from
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Screenshots from Linux's GParted:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-12172012-012707am.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-12172012-014310am.php
Perhaps somebody can exactly write the steps I have to do, to install
FreeBSD on /dev/sda1.
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:05:00 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I startet the FreeBSD installer, chose the shell and then run:
# mount -t ufs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
# cd /mnt
# rm -r *
# rm -r .*
That worked? I can hardly understand why /dev/ad0s1 is
mountable
31 matches
Mail list logo
