-- Forwarded message --
From: Aldis Berjoza graude...@yandex.com
Date: Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD
I've never used NanoBSD, but, check if ssh daemon can write to /etc/ssh/
otherwise it won't be able to save ssh_host_* keys
Or you
Hi,
# portmaster /usr/ports/www/nspluginwrapper
...
=== www/nspluginwrapper accessibility/linux-f10-atk
emulators/linux_base-f10 (2/2)
=== Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
=== This port is marked IGNORE
=== linuxulator is not (kld)loaded
=== If you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 01/01/2013 13:01, Bekim's Mac wrote:
It's traditional to actually ask a question...
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:01:53 +0100, Bekim's Mac wrote:
{nothing}
My PHP admin has no idea what to answer. :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To open some url you need to use web browser.
Sending URL to freebsd mail list would not open it.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Bekim's Mac bekimbisl...@gmail.com wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:11:21 +0330, takCoder wrote:
everything is fine until i restart my nanoBSD server. the problem is that
each time i restart my server, the source system is complaining about that
i need to edit my known_hosts file cause my nanoBSD hash-code is not
matched..
how can i
thank you for the details mentioned :)
but now, a questions occurred to me about this ssh key.
as i don't know enough about its process, would you please tell me whether
this key is a shared key for all ssh clients who send a request? or it
differs as the client changes?
(this question may sound
On 01/01/2013 13:52, jb wrote:
=== Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
=== This port is marked IGNORE
=== linuxulator is not (kld)loaded
It is said there :
=== Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
=== This port is marked IGNORE
uname -r returns 10.0-CURRENT
setenv UNAME_r 9.0-RELEASE
uname -r now returns 9.0-RELEASE
How to reset uname -r to original value without doing
setenv UNAME_r 10.0-CURRENT?
Is there some way just to deactivate the effect of the
setenv UNAME_r so it returns to the real value of the system?
David Demelier demelier.david at gmail.com writes:
...
Do you have linux emulation enabled? Such as linux_enable=YES in your
/etc/rc.conf
Cheers,
David
Yes, indeed, that was the cause. Thanks.
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Don't top-post, please.
takCoder tak.offic...@gmail.com writes:
but now, a questions occurred to me about this ssh key.
as i don't know enough about its process, would you please tell me whether
this key is a shared key for all ssh clients who send a request? or it
differs as the client
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
ended up trying
cd dir-tree1
mtree -c | mtree -p dir-tree2
Now this seems like it worked, except every thing was flagged for
non-matching modification time. How do I tell it to not check modification
time?
mtree -c -k
Jason Lenthe wrote:
On 01/01/13 12:49, Fbsd8 wrote:
Is there some way just to deactivate the effect of the
setenv UNAME_r so it returns to the real value of the system?
I think you just want to do: unsetenv UNAME_r
Yes that worked.
Thanks
___
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jan 1 11:52:49 2013
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:49:17 -0500
From: Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com
To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Changing value of uname -r
uname -r returns 10.0-CURRENT
setenv UNAME_r 9.0-RELEASE
Greetings, list. I have the following error; though I can load
update5.FreeBSD.org in a browser:
root-is-on-fire # freebsd-update fetch
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching public key from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed.
Fetching public key from update5.FreeBSD.org...
Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jan 1 11:52:49 2013
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:49:17 -0500
From: Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com
To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Changing value of uname -r
uname -r returns 10.0-CURRENT
setenv UNAME_r
In a port I am working on I have a link for home - /user/home
In the ports pkg-plist I can delete every thing but that darn link.
Is there some statement along the line of
%%EXAMPLESDIR%%default/home/lab1/.profile
that will delete the @home link?
___
Fbsd8 wrote:
In a port I am working on I have a link for home - /user/home
In the ports pkg-plist I can delete every thing but that darn link.
Is there some statement along the line of
%%EXAMPLESDIR%%default/home/lab1/.profile
that will delete the @home link?
sorry for the noise, figured it
My FreeBSD server had been running fine, no issues. This evening I
tried to update it to 9.1. I don't update in place, I update by
wiping the prior version and letting the new version have its way with
the disk.
Well, 9.1 has issues with my system (dmesg is at the end of this
message).
When
Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment of
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/
This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote:
Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment
of
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/
In fact, yes, pkg_add and the other pkg_tools commands are being phased
out in favour of pkgng. However it is
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote:
Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment
of
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/
In fact, yes, pkg_add and the other pkg_tools commands are being
23 matches
Mail list logo
