Change branch with svn

2013-01-17 Thread David Demelier
Hello folks, Just wanted to switch from RELEASE-9.1 to 9-STABLE my /usr/src, I was used to csup, this tool was updating the src tree without removing it. How can I switch my /usr/src tree to stable/9 branch without removing old files? Cheers, David

Re: Change branch with svn

2013-01-17 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
17.01.2013 10:47, David Demelier: Hello folks, Just wanted to switch from RELEASE-9.1 to 9-STABLE my /usr/src, I was used to csup, this tool was updating the src tree without removing it. How can I switch my /usr/src tree to stable/9 branch without removing old files? # svn switch ^/stable/9

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-17 Thread Robert Bonomi
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jan 16 22:08:13 2013 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:04:15 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ? This is not really a FreeBSD problem ...

TrafficCaptain Offer Update

2013-01-17 Thread TrafficCaptain
Hello, I represent TrafficCaptain - a performance network focused entirely on the gaming industry. In our offers you can find well-known game developers like Big Point, Upjers, Ubisoft, Travian, Kabam, Farbflut etc. We are active

Re: time_t definition

2013-01-17 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Polytropon free...@edvax.de writes: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:21:03 -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: Top posting for brevity - the fact is, the code in your original example is wrong. There are reasons to complain about argument size mismatches, esp. in print functions that call (versions of)

Re: absurd I/O perf with ZFS: hangs on zfs-cv)

2013-01-17 Thread Eitan Adler
On 17 January 2013 07:52, Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote: Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: I don't think there are any laptops with large amounts of RAM as far as ZFS is concerned. Haha okay: 8GB of RAM. It is taking me 45 minutes to make 5 commits to git. Something

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-17 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote: First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that dns is listed on the hosts: line. Next, try disabling nscd (svcadm disable name-service-cache) , and then running truss ping www.google.com (make sure to reenable nscd when you're done

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-17 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote: First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that dns is listed on the hosts: line. Next, try disabling nscd (svcadm disable name-service-cache) , and then running truss ping www.google.com (make sure to reenable nscd when you're done

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-17 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote: First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that dns is listed on the hosts: line. Next, try disabling nscd (svcadm disable name-service-cache) , and then running truss ping www.google.com (make sure to reenable nscd when you're done

Replacement for KGET from KDE3

2013-01-17 Thread RW
I'm looking for a replacement for kget from KDE3 which I use with Konqueror on easynews.com. As the site has download accounting and I have a slow dsl line I have hundreds of files queued-up - often for months. Ideally what I after is something similar - Browser integration - The ability to

FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Georg Reilinger
Hi everybody, My issue is the following: As far as I know, FreeBSD has completely dropped support for KDE 3.5. Whether it's the ports, or the pkg_add precompiled binaries. Am I right in assuming this? I am currently running a live version of FreeBSD 8.2 with KDE 4.8. The thing here is,

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Some decisions from upstream are a PITA. I'm from Linux, it's more up-to-date than FreeBSD. On Linux I switched from KDE 3 to GNOME 2, when KDE 4 was introduced and from GNOME 2 to Xfce, when GNOME 3 was introduced. There are forks of GNOME 2, but I guess there's no fork of KDE 3. Some

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Georg Reilinger
Von: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com An: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Gesendet: 2:37 Freitag, 18.Januar 2013 Betreff: Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD -- Some decisions from

Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Mike Jeays
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:25:03 + (GMT) Georg Reilinger georgreilin...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi everybody, My issue is the following: As far as I know, FreeBSD has completely dropped support for KDE 3.5. Whether it's the ports, or the pkg_add precompiled binaries. Am I right in

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:06:15 +0100, Georg Reilinger georgreilin...@yahoo.de wrote: http://www.trinitydesktop.org/ Oops, I've forgotten that there is that fork. However, I suspect that KDE and GNOME forks will suffer from Qt and GTK dependencies, resp. the manpower (coders and user base,

tar compression

2013-01-17 Thread Fbsd8
The man page for tar command says there a 4 different compress types you can use, xz, bzip, bzip2 and gzip. Which one is the fastest and compresses the most? I am using -z option for gzip and it sure is slow. Hoping one of the other zip options are better. What do you guys use? Another

Re: tar compression

2013-01-17 Thread Georg Reilinger
If it doesn't necessarily have to be tar, then I'd recommend using 7zip: archivers/p7zip It has among the best compression ratios. Von: Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com An: FreeBSD questions questi...@freebsd.org Gesendet: 3:29 Freitag, 18.Januar 2013 Betreff:

Re: tar compression

2013-01-17 Thread Fbsd8
Georg Reilinger wrote: If it doesn't necessarily have to be tar, then I'd recommend using 7zip: archivers/p7zip It has among the best compression ratios. The man page for tar command says there a 4 different compress types you can use, xz, bzip, bzip2 and gzip. Which one is the fastest and

Re: tar compression

2013-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:46:31 +0100, Georg Reilinger georgreilin...@yahoo.de wrote: If it doesn't necessarily have to be tar, then I'd recommend using 7zip: archivers/p7zip It has among the best compression ratios. It doesn't archive permissions. I guess the best compression ratio to pack

Re: tar compression

2013-01-17 Thread Joe Altman
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:29:55PM -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: The man page for tar command says there a 4 different compress types you can use, xz, bzip, bzip2 and gzip. xz uses Lempel-Ziv-Markov chain algorithm. bzip2 uses Burrows-Wheeler transform. Which one is the fastest and compresses the

Re: tar compression

2013-01-17 Thread Joe Altman
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 03:59:39AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: It doesn't archive permissions. Which is why, if it is used, one *must* (or *should*) use tar. Best, Joe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: svn-export Re: svn bdb checkout?

2013-01-17 Thread Xyne
Peter Vereshagin wrote: I believe 'amd64' is the common architecture these days and 'perl malloc' is the feature needed for profiling and/or leaks detection. Good news is that such a stuff can be redone with forks instead of threads but it should take me the time amount I'm not supposed to have

Error upgrading Chromium

2013-01-17 Thread Kurt Buff
Just updated from 8.3 to FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3, and am reinstalling ports. Chromium is giving me two errors and bombing out. The errors are: media/audio/pulst/pulse_output.cc:89L28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'kChannelOrderings'; did you mean 'ChannelOrder'? int channel_position =

Re: time_t definition

2013-01-17 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:24:27 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Polytropon free...@edvax.de writes: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:21:03 -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: Top posting for brevity - the fact is, the code in your original example is wrong. There are reasons to complain about argument size

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:25:03 + (GMT), Georg Reilinger wrote: As far as I know, FreeBSD has completely dropped support for KDE 3.5. As for other desktop environments, yes. Whether it's the ports, or the pkg_add precompiled binaries. Am I right in assuming this? I think KDE 3 is still

Re: svn-export Re: svn bdb checkout?

2013-01-17 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Xyne wrote: I'm the author of svn-export. I haven't really touched the code since I wrote it in 2009 and back then I tended to write most things in noobish Perl. Although it should not be difficult to replace threading with forking (and I agree that Perl threading is

Re: time_t definition

2013-01-17 Thread Thomas D. Dean
On 01/17/13 06:24, Lowell Gilbert wrote: A lot of discussion about what I can do other than understand why gcc does not keep track of the basic typedef. Mayhe the question is beyond this list. Thanks for the replies. Tom Dean ___

Dependencies after port tree update

2013-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Hi :) I had to do a portsnap fetch update to compile icedtea-web and run into a dependency hell. Most apps can't be launched anymore. When I deinstall, recompile the new versions and install them, I have tons of dependencies for each app. Is there a way to automatically recompile all

Re: Dependencies after port tree update

2013-01-17 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:46:06 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Is there a way to automatically recompile all broken apps and dependencies? Yes, using a port management tool such as portmaster should be able to resolve all those problems automatically, usually by explicitely requesting the compile

Re: time_t definition

2013-01-17 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:46:25 -0800, Thomas D. Dean wrote: A lot of discussion about what I can do other than understand why gcc does not keep track of the basic typedef. As explained, gcc issues a valid (!) warning because there was a type mismatch: You tried to printf() a (long) value with