in message op.wrms0fqkqhadp0@freebsd,
wrote Ralf Mardorf thusly...
Hi :)
I hope it's ok, when I open a new thread for this issue.
First I need to know what files have a bad owner.
I'm running
# freebsd-update IDS outfile_28Jan2013.ids
perhaps this will give some useful output, regarding
Good day
I have an old machine that has lost its raid (0/ stripe).
Im trying to fix this.
If I go
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# gstripe list
Geom name: st0
State: UP
Status: Total=3, Online=3
Type: AUTOMATIC
Stripesize: 65536
ID: 1006591079
Providers:
1. Name: stripe/st0
Mediasize:
There are few things you should do.
First,
w/r to you complaint about first-kill-then restart, this will do it for you
/etc/rc.d/dhclient lagg0 restart
second,
I remember you wrote that you have a trouble with disconnects even in
wireless-only setup (no failover setup). If so, you should run and
A follow-up:
third,
I would test with IPv6 disabled (entirely for the system), regardless of
connectivity type;
that also means to explicitly disable that failover setup line in your config
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=**YES
jb
W/r to IPv6 (disable, enable, etc):
read man pages for
29.01.2013 11:54, Michael Powell:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I guess what I'm trying to point out is that low performance wrt software
RAID will stem from other things besides just simply consuming a few CPU
cycles. Today's CPUs have the cycles to spare. I've been using gmirror for
RAID 1 mirrors
El día Monday, January 28, 2013 a las 10:28:06PM -1000, parv escribió:
in message op.wrms0fqkqhadp0@freebsd,
wrote Ralf Mardorf thusly...
Hi :)
I hope it's ok, when I open a new thread for this issue.
First I need to know what files have a bad owner.
I'm running
# freebsd-update
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 22:28 -1000, parv wrote:
in message op.wrms0fqkqhadp0@freebsd,
wrote Ralf Mardorf thusly...
Hi :)
I hope it's ok, when I open a new thread for this issue.
First I need to know what files have a bad owner.
I'm running
# freebsd-update IDS
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:08 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a new installation.
Perhaps true, but if such a simple mistake can't be fixed, what happens
when somebody makes a big mistake? Perhaps more people stay with Linux
than other *NIX,
El día Tuesday, January 29, 2013 a las 12:23:09PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf escribió:
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:08 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a new installation.
Perhaps true, but if such a simple mistake can't be fixed, what happens
when
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:08:20 +0100
Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Monday, January 28, 2013 a las 10:28:06PM -1000, parv escribió:
In general, I find all this thread (wrong file owner) a bit boring.
I find it very interesting.
This is a mayor damage and can only be
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:44:55 +0100, Erich Dollansky
erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com wrote:
It cannot get worse. His experience will show also others how robust
FreeBSD is in case of failures.
Indeed. Linux users ask me why I play with FreeBSD. I already could make a
list with drawbacks and
29.01.2013 04:37, Thomas Mueller:
28.01.2013 01:57, james:
I have a 9.1 system with some SATA disks in RAIDZ, upgraded from 9.0.
The disks are all the same type, and I formatted them for FreeBSD and
put ZFS in a slice covering most of them.
I have seen suggestions for OpenIndiana etc that it
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:57:30 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:44:55 +0100, Erich Dollansky
erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com wrote:
It cannot get worse. His experience will show also others how robust
FreeBSD is in case of failures.
Indeed.
Artem Kuchin wrote:
[snip]
The server is going to be a web server with many sites and with mysql
running on it. Nothing really really
heavy. Currently with run all this on our own server with 8 cores and
16GB ram and 3ware raid1
and cpu load is about 5% :) Everything is quick and responsive.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:58:18 +0100, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
mtree
I was confused, since the existing files only provide directories. Ok, I
guess I understand, I can let mtree generate new files using the backup. I
anyway need to take care about files that are missing by the backup.
Thank
I'm surprised, there's no /bin/sh for the backup:
# ls -ld /bin/sh
-r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 142952 Dec 23 18:38 /bin/sh
# ls -ld /usr/TMP4DIFF/bin/sh
ls: /usr/TMP4DIFF/bin/sh: No such file or directory
This is an error in reasoning :D. I compared the original /bin, with a
restore
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
My other concern is what happens when one drive goes down if we use gmirror?
Is it completelly transparent
and bad drive can be hot swapped while server is running and rebuild started?
I am thinking now about gpt+gmirror (including boot and swap)
As
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
It starts the boot process fine and gets to the Bootstrap loader
message with
On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Presumably the disks are currently FreeBSD-specific. If I used raw
disks instead of slices, could I read them from a Solaris system too?
^ I'm mostly sure you would be able to read disks from Solaris/x86.
^ However Solaris/Sparc uses
On Jan 29, 2013, at 6:59 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Is GPT compatible with Solaris, can Solaris access a GPT disk?
Yes. I'm not sure if it can boot off GPT disk but on Solaris zpool
automatically creates boundary GPT partition to protect ZFS vdev.
Under the Solaris-based OSes I
29.01.2013 18:57, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The Handbook chapter on gmirror talks about the problems with GPT and
GEOM metadata. In short: right now, they conflict. It's possible to
mirror GPT partitions, but be aware that if you mirror more than one
partition
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:57:31 -0600, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
wrote:
As far a gmirror is concerned, yes, drives can be removed and new drives
inserted while the mirror is running. Hot swap is more of an issue with
the hardware. I have not tried it with SATA drives, although I think
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:54:55 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:41:34 +0100, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/28/2013 7:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Still not perfect, I guess I need something similar to ls -RAl for some
directories :S and I didn't test what awk will do
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:23:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:08 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a new installation.
Perhaps true, but if such a simple mistake can't be fixed, [...]
Excuse me, it's not a _simple_ mistake. It
I don't use space in filenames, I just wanted to ensure, that file names
with spaces will be handled partly correctly.
At the moment I'm not working intensively. Every once in a while I take a
look at a directory and compare it with the backups. If there's something
wrong, I manually run
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
29.01.2013 18:57, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The Handbook chapter on gmirror talks about the problems with GPT and GEOM
metadata. In short: right now, they conflict. It's possible to mirror GPT
partitions, but be aware
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:52:47 -0800, Patrick wrote:
Is there any way in FreeBSD to view all running processes hierarchically,
like Activity Monitor in Mac OS X can do?
e.g.
http://f.cl.ly/items/37310J17273X3F1E1l0G/Image%202013.01.29%2013:50:36%20.png
I believe I have a masked process
pstree? (in sysutils from ports)
--
Devin
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:53 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List
Subject: Viewing processes
Maybe it's intentional but in section
25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
The step that says:
portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18?
Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb
Thanks,
--
Alejandro Imass
On 1/29/2013 3:52 PM, Patrick wrote:
Is there any way in FreeBSD to view all running processes hierarchically,
like Activity Monitor in Mac OS X can do?
e.g.
http://f.cl.ly/items/37310J17273X3F1E1l0G/Image%202013.01.29%2013:50:36%20.png
I believe I have a masked process spawned from an Apache
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:31 PM, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
pstree? (in sysutils from ports)
--
Devin
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:53 PM
To:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Maybe it's intentional but in section
25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
The step that says:
portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18?
Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb
That's a good
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Maybe it's intentional but in section
25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
The step that says:
portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb
Fbsd8 wrote:
I have noticed that the /etc/rc.d/jail script
will not start a jail that has the same ip address
as a jail that is already running.
But if I define 2 jails the manual way in rc.conf that
have the same ip address they will start.
So is this a bug in the jail script or is there some
On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
It starts the boot process fine
You sent an email to the Exchange list
with an attachment. We have disabled this
option as recently a virus was attached.
Please resend your posting without it?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD
Admittedly disk space is cheap, but old habits die hard and I just don't
like keeping stuff I no longer need.
I converted to pkgng just under a couple of months ago, and have had no
serious problems (even the minor issues have been promptly resolved with
the kind and able assistance of Matthew
On 30/01/2013 04:47, Walter Hurry wrote:
Admittedly disk space is cheap, but old habits die hard and I just don't
like keeping stuff I no longer need.
I converted to pkgng just under a couple of months ago, and have had no
serious problems (even the minor issues have been promptly resolved
39 matches
Mail list logo
