Hello
I have tried to create a GPT partition scheme on my machine. I've
created some dataset like that :
tank/usr
tank/usr/ports
tank/usr/src
tank/var/
tank/var/log
(Please note that is a test on a virtual machine before applying to a
real machine).
I've tried to generate the zpool.cache like
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:16+0200, David Demelier wrote:
Hello
I have tried to create a GPT partition scheme on my machine. I've
created some dataset like that :
tank/usr
tank/usr/ports
tank/usr/src
tank/var/
tank/var/log
(Please note that is a test on a virtual machine before
2013/4/10 Trond Endrestøl trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:16+0200, David Demelier wrote:
Hello
I have tried to create a GPT partition scheme on my machine. I've
created some dataset like that :
tank/usr
tank/usr/ports
tank/usr/src
tank/var/
tank/var/log
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:05+0200, David Demelier wrote:
My own blog entry is a bit (out)dated, but maybe it's worth a look:
http://ximalas.info/2011/10/17/zfs-root-fs-on-freebsd-9-0/
Now I currently have 504 Gateway Timeout going to your website, I will
try at home maybe my corporate
Thanks for the info... it looks like Apache supports, does anyone out there
have first hand experience of using it? What issues, if any does this pose
with email services like Dovecot or Exim and providing SSL authentication?
What about anonymous FTP? Don't I need multiple IP's for multiple
Is there anything likely to be available in the future (3 months to a year) to
avoid the Windows tax on FreeBSD instances for the smaller (t1.micro,
m1.small, m1.medium) types? I understand the problem but don't find anything
much online about a possible solution. Probably because I don't
For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long
waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating
small systems. But even though the development server security
breach is now long past, there are no published binary packages for
FreeBSD 9.1. When will they be
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long waits and/or
having to set up a special build machine when creating small systems. But
even though the development server security breach is now long past,
On 04/10/2013 20:39, Brett Glass wrote:
For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long waits
and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating small
systems. But even though the development server security breach is now
long past, there are no published binary
Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to
come up to speed on
this. Might be a temporary workaround.
In the meantime, I'm trying to install Apache 2.2 on a small
server. So far, just to
build the port, the machine has built Perl, Python, m4, Berkeley
DB, and an
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to come up
to speed on
this. Might be a temporary workaround.
it is def. where the project is moving towards for binary pkg
distribution, so it won't be a
On 04/09/2013 19:40, Joshua Lokken wrote:
Hello, yesterday, I was happily installing kde4 from packages with:
pkg_add -r kde4
with $PACKAGESITE set to:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/Latest/
I had to kill the install at the end of the work day, and when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/10/13 2:19 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to
come up to speed on this. Might be a temporary workaround.
In the meantime, I'm trying to install Apache 2.2 on a small
server. So far,
On 4/10/2013 at 11:39 AM Brett Glass wrote:
|For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long
|waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating
|small systems. But even though the development server security
|breach is now long past, there are no published
On 04/10/2013 22:19, Mike. wrote:
On 4/10/2013 at 11:39 AM Brett Glass wrote:
|For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long
|waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating
|small systems. But even though the development server security
|breach is now long
Mike. wrote:
[snip]
Additionally, for me, building from ports for me has tended to pull in
many, many X-windows support files when they are not needed.
Specifically, I run a non-windowing system using command line tools.
When I tried to compile Samba from ports, I finally killed the
On 4/10/2013 at 3:39 PM Michael Powell wrote:
|Mike. wrote:
|
|[snip]
|
|
| Additionally, for me, building from ports for me has tended to pull
in
| many, many X-windows support files when they are not needed.
|
| Specifically, I run a non-windowing system using command line tools.
| When I
I still follow Colin's original pattern of using a minimal Linux
grub boot EBS device (1GB), ext2fs, with the root partition being on
another (ufs2) EBS device. This works very well, with a couple of
caveats -
- Install e2fsprogs (pkg or port) - you will need it, on occasion when
modifying the
Just made that into a batch file for my library. Should be a target in
the standard ports Makefile, IMHO. Maybe call it rdistclean. Perhaps
this could be submitted as a PR.
--Brett Glass
At 12:37 PM 4/10/2013, Greg Larkin wrote:
Here's an easy way to delete all of the distfiles for a port and
Good afternoon, dear FreeBSd enthusiasts. Is there anyone who has attempted to
install a TP-LINK TL-WDN4800 p.c.i.-express wireless network interface card? I
am using FreeBSD 9.1 on a Hewlett-Packard xw4400 workstation. The card works
perfectly under Windows XP. However, it seems that the
You'll need to run -CURRENT instead of 9.1, and all the caveats that
apply. You'll also need the special HAL that hasn't yet been commited
to -CURRENT. There are instructions on the freebsd-wireless mailing
list. I'm using that exact card right now.
Run `pciconf -lv` and you should see it,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:14:21 -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
Just made that into a batch file for my library. Should be a target in
the standard ports Makefile, IMHO. Maybe call it rdistclean. Perhaps
this could be submitted as a PR.
There are various options in portsclean (provided by ports-mgmt/
p style=margin-bottom:12pt
span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifHi Hk4U.Com
Team,/span/pp style=margin-bottom:12pt
span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifHope you are
doing fine./span/pp style=margin-bottom:12pt
span
Have you made any AMI's based on this method? I would love to deploy a
medium or large instance that isn't subject to the 'tax', but don't really
know where to start to build one like this.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
