On 11/2/06, Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mybox# ifconfig
rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet 208.70.104.3 netmask 0xff80 broadcast 208.70.104.127
inet 192.168.250.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast
Hi,
At work I have a FreeBSD machine that I use for various testing and I need
to setup an IPv6 only LAN using this machine. To this end, I have a few
questions.
1) How can I remove an address from an interface using ifconfig (or other
utility)? That is, I want to remove all IPv6 addresses
What package will work to run Windoze programs in FreeBSD/amd64? I don't
usually worry about, but my
Father switched to FreeBSD/amd64 (which is what I run) and he can't seem to
find one. I first steered him toward vmware3, which I found in the ports.
But it refused to install because of being
I am by no means the worlds best serial programmer, but recently I have done
some work on this subject and I noticed one thing in the code sample above
that should be avoided. However, I'll give you what I saw in-line:
#include stdio.h
#include termios.h
#include unistd.h
#include fcntl.h
Hello everyone,
I had to blow away my 6.0 installation and simply install 6.1 release. I
found out that I would have to update my ports manually and since I don't
have high speed access to the Internet, this just wasn't feasible.
So, after installing (which went smoothly) I'm getting
Hello everybody,
I did a binary upgrade on my FreeBSD 6.0 RELEASE system up to 6.1
RELEASE. However, I'm still running KDE 3.4 and firefox still doesn't
work. I didn't understand this, but apparently the ports that are
installed to a system don't upgrade with a binary upgrade. Ok, so,
the
Hello everyone,
If I do pkg_info with nothing else, all looks well. However, if I do
pkg_info | grep package_name (which I do frequently so I don't
have to read through the entire list) I get these two errors:
pkg_info: the package info for package 'portupgrade-2.0.1_1,1' is corrupt
pkg_info:
Hello everyone,
Can anyone tell me if the serial driver in FreeBSD supports hardware flow
control? I'm still working on my program for serial communications and
someone I'm getting some help from mentioned that there is some question as
to whether or not the FreeBSD driver supports hardware
I'm still working on my program for serial communications. While getting
help from someone else, he mentioned that, There are questions as to the
FreeBSD serial driver etc. whether it supports hardware flow control
itself. What I'm wondering is, does the driver support hardware flow
control?
Trying this one again. It didn't get through (for some reason).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 27, 2006 1:13 PM
Subject: Question on the serial port driver in FreeBSD
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I'm still working on my program
Hello,
I've got a case where I'm writing a simply serial program to send bytes from
one system to another over a serial cable. The program works in Linux, but
when I use it in FreeBSD nothing happens. The program starts and, in the
case of receiving, waits for data to appear on the /dev/cuad1
everythin
accordingly?
Andy
On 6/22/06, Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy,
Did you kill the getty running on the port?
Are you getting any errors?
-Derek
At 10:28 AM 6/22/2006, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hello,
I've got a case where I'm writing a simply serial program to send bytes
Unfortunately, it looks like getty isn't running on /dev/cuad1. I did the
ps command you suggest below and it apears that getty is only running on the
virtual terminals (ttyvx).
Would you have any idea what it is that kermit is doing differently that I?
Andy
On 6/22/06, Derek Ragona [EMAIL
At 01:57 PM 6/22/2006, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Unfortunately, it looks like getty isn't running on /dev/cuad1. I did the
ps command you suggest below and it apears that getty is only running on the
virtual terminals (ttyvx).
Would you have any idea what it is that kermit is doing differently
On 6/22/06, David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:19:41PM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Derek,
No I didn't disable the getty on the port. To be honest, I didn't know
one
was running.
Its not going to be running by default. Even if it was then it would be
on /dev
Ok, I was following my post in usenet (didn't know that messages posted
here were propogated there, cool). Someone responded to another chap
who was having a similar problem as mine that the issue was probably
that they hadn't loaded the FreeBSD bootloader on to the second drive.
So, I did
You mean you got through the install and when you were asked on which
slice you wanted to install FreeBSD you were only offered the choice of
the SATA drive?
If you have a working FreeBSD system, what does dmesg say? What does
fdisk (from inside FreeBSD) say? They both only see the SATA
Hi,
I'm new to FreeBSD but not to UNIX. The guy who burned me the 6.0
release iso's told me that during the install, FreeBSD would detect my
Windows XP drive but it didn't. I have two hard drives, one for FreeBSD
one for Windows. The FreeBSD drive is SATA and the Windows is PATA
(IDE, but
201 - 218 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
