and a direct checkout from their
SVN, and I'm getting very similar error messages. From the changelog and
the manpage it looks like some work has been done to make this work.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
not really clearing the drive you are aiming for, it
is to write to every sector. If you have a failed sector (which you do),
writing to it will force the drive firmware to remap the sector. As far
as I know, most drives will not remap an unreadable sector until it is
written to.
/Daniel Eriksson
Mark Stapper wrote:
So I see. Could this be why I haven't had any read errors anymore?
(After the zpool scrub that is)
Possibly, but in that case the SMART selftest should pass also. Have you
tried a selftest after you did the scrub?
/Daniel Eriksson
finishes without checksum errors and without any ATA-related errors the
drive is probably in good enough condition to keep using, but watch out
for more ATA errors. If the drive is dying it won't be long before it
starts to generate more ATA errors.
/Daniel Eriksson
a RocketRAID card to access the data on the drive.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
it to your RR2310 card.
Partition table example:
# gpart create -t GPT adXX
# gpart add -b YY -s ZZ -t freebsd-ufs adXX
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
yet.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
affect a typical web
server. It does not seem to affect any of my fileservers (exporting NFS).
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1
5. edit /etc/rc.conf and add zfs_enable=YES
6. reboot
7. be happy!
(With 16 GB memory you can probably use larger values for slightly
better performance in step #4 above.)
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
fsck of large filesystems.
Personally I'm going with ZFS for my next large array (8x750GB).
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Why are you not using the supplied scripts and configuration knobs to
start Sendmail? It works just fine for 99% of FreeBSD users (my guess),
so what makes your environment so special that your needs cannot be met
without custom scripts?
/Daniel Eriksson
the smart host line like you already have done:
define(`SMART_HOST', `mx2.optonline.net')dnl
* make all install restart
* try to send mail again
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
This should work, right? Or am I missing something? (One of the jails is
a mysql server, the rest are www servers.)
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
installed a new webserver with
multiple jails to keep the different sites compartmentalized, and
avoiding the xorg-libs saved me a ton of space and compile time.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
.
Google hasn't been much help, and I thought I'd ask here before I dug
in to
the sourcecode. I'm wondering if there's an upper limit (either hard
or
practical) on the number of mountpoints on a system?
I have a box running 6-STABLE that has 700+ nullfs mounts, and it runs
just fine.
/Daniel Eriksson
I've started using GPT for everything but the system disk.
To add a GPT table to a new disk and create a partition in that table
that spans the entire disk, all you need to do is this:
# gpt create /dev/adX
# gpt add /dev/adX
# newfs -O2 -U /dev/adXp1
Done!
/Daniel Eriksson
for
current afaik.)
When will gjournal and zfs be committed to the CVS tree? Will either of
them be merged to STABLE?
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
the regular CVS tree?
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this file and uncomment the SMART_HOST line and insert an
SMTP server that will relay mail for you
example: define(`SMART_HOST', `mailrelay.myisp.com')
make cf install restart
Done!
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
', `[mailrelay.myisp.com]')
This will force Sendmail to connect directly to that host, instead of
doing a DNS lookup for MX pointers.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
. However, polling mode
means no interrupts so the ISR is never called(?).
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
during full upstream saturation).
My question is: Do I need to tell the pipe how fat it is (${fwcmd} pipe 1
config bw 10Mbit/s) to get the queue prioritization to work properly, or is
it OK to leave out the speed and just let it run full tilt?
/Daniel Eriksson
significant slowdown. Under what usecase(s) is it
slow? (My usage is mainly for medium to large files, with 200 files per
directory.)
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
(with regards to building arrays from BIOS and similar
tasks). How about firmware upgrades of the card and/or the discs? Can that
be done without a Proliant server?
I would appreciate any information!
/Daniel Eriksson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
Jeremy Faulkner wrote:
What international standard describes their format?
Windows is not a standard.
Many times a de-facto standard is just as important/valid as a real
standard.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
should run a vinum start
backup.p0.s3. I'm not sure if this will rebuild all the data automatically
(it does for RAID-1 arrays), but if it doesn't then I guess you also need to
run a vinum rebuildparity backup.p0.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
procedures for using and maintaining RAID arrays.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
depending on
what controller is used? For example would there be any performance
difference (transfer speed and/or system resource usage) between ataraid on
a HPT374-based card (such as the Highpoint RocketRAID 454) and one of the
new Promise cards (which we have really good drivers for afaik).
Daniel
29 matches
Mail list logo
