On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
--As of October 4, 2011 2:43:45 AM -0400, Dave Cundiff is alleged to have
said:
I don't know what triggers the problem but I know how to fix it. If I
perform a couple snapshot deletes the IO will come back in line every
massive amounts of CPU during the
lockup. Normally they sit around 5-10%. Any suggestions on where I
could start to track this down would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
--
Dave Cundiff
System Administrator
A2Hosting, Inc
http://www.a2hosting.com
___
freebsd
: 62580701
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_write_buffer_list_null_iter: 2040782
kstat.zfs.misc.vdev_cache_stats.delegations: 2167916
kstat.zfs.misc.vdev_cache_stats.hits: 2801310
kstat.zfs.misc.vdev_cache_stats.misses: 5448597
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Dave Cundiff syshack...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:50:51AM -0400, Dave Cundiff wrote:
Hello,
I'm seeing a strange problem trying to use zfs promote.
[root@san2]# zfs snapshot san/sr@snap
[root@san2]# zfs clone san/sr@snap san/sr5
[root
. Are
there any caveats to using zfs promote on zvols? The snapshots are of
ext3 formatted zvols. I don't really need to promote them but wanted
to in case I needed to destroy the source for some reason.
Thanks,
--
Dave Cundiff
System Administrator
A2Hosting, Inc
http://www.a2hosting.com
.
--
Dave Cundiff
System Administrator
A2Hosting, Inc
http://www.a2hosting.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
