Gary Kline wrote:
Well, it pays to check prices! the Avocent brand of KVM
are an arm and *three* legs. I have abs no use for anything
fancy. just want something to get me to boot status on
different boxes... a number of you suggested a kvm switch
with the brand
On 06/25/2012 08:00 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Edward M eam1edw...@gmail.com wrote:
That reply was not meant for you, so why do you care?
If it wasn't meant for everyone on the list,
why was it sent to the list?
by accident. still learning how to use email client:-[ . once
On 06/23/2012 10:38 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
last binary production ready, used version 14; i also found it
to be stable
Any opensource zfs pool verisons beyound that, i am not really sure
about their stablity compared
to UFS rock solid filesystem.
No ZFS pool version can be as
On 06/24/2012 04:23 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Edward M eam1edw...@gmail.com
mailto:eam1edw...@gmail.com wrote:
Dont email me privately.
Don't be an ass. Standard list conventions allows for private email.
If this is simply an individual case
On 06/21/2012 12:33 AM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
Now, I want to the same thing on 8.3 and wanted to know
your opinion on ZFS stability. Is there any success story using
ZFS in 24x7, large volume, heavy duty servers? Is there any
other option other than ZFS to build larger than 2TB file systems?
On 06/23/2012 04:19 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/21/2012 12:33 AM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
Now, I want to the same thing on 8.3 and wanted to know
your opinion on ZFS stability. Is there any success story using
ZFS in 24x7, large volume, heavy duty servers? Is there any
other option other than ZFS
On 06/23/2012 05:16 PM, John Levine wrote:
Sorry, I misread my notes, 8.2 uses v 15, 8.3 uses v 28.
R's,
John
yeah, I remember version 15 was really stable. Opensolaris 2009.06
last binary production ready, used version 14; i also found it to
be stable
Any opensource zfs pool
On 06/20/2012 06:54 PM, Modulok wrote:
Even general pointers to books/websites would be great. Once I know what it's
called I can google much more effectively
Mars rover is robotic/embedded.
I am using this site myself.
http://www.societyofrobots.com/
On 06/15/2012 01:06 AM, David Demelier wrote:
That's what mplayer says:
==
Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders
AUDIO: 48000 Hz, 6 ch, s16le, 448.0 kbit/9.72% (ratio: 56000-576000)
Selected
On 06/14/2012 09:03 AM, David Demelier wrote:
I have an old SB Live! card with a 5.1 speaker set, but i can't get
sound from center and rear speakers with mplayer.
I'm using the snd_emu10kx driver and when I try to play a DVD I get
sound only through the front speakers (and LFE) like a 2.1
On 06/12/2012 01:40 PM, pwnedomina wrote:
to format an ascii text to be identical to that one, centered and
aligned..
would not that require the use of HTML?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 06/12/2012 02:01 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/12/2012 01:40 PM, pwnedomina wrote:
to format an ascii text to be identical to that one, centered and
aligned..
would not that require the use of HTML?
Oops... just dawn on me you may be trying to print an ascii file and
may not be trying
On 06/10/2012 08:09 AM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
This is really missing the point. The issue is not open source
vs. proprietary although many people seem to try to steer everything into
that meaningless conflict.
The point is the WinTel Mafia's many years of collusion and screwing over
the customer.
On 06/06/2012 01:35 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
But this is more to do with the BIOS than with Intel as such. Wasn't
there a FreeBIOS, later LinuxBIOS, now coreboot I believe..?
So replacing the BIOS entirely wouldn't suffice to override all this nonsense?
On 05/18/2012 09:17 PM, Andriy Babiy wrote:
FreeBSD myhost 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Fri Mar 23 20:00:59
PDT 2012 root@myhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
root#cd /usr/obj
root#chflags -R noschg *
root#rm -rf *
root#make buildworld
...
cd /usr/src; MACHINE=i386
On 05/18/2012 09:17 PM, Andriy Babiy wrote:
Makefile.inc1, line 160: CPUTYPE global should be set with ?=
I think the problem is the wrong cpu type define. . I took a
glance at the code in the makefile.inc1 to see what would set that
error off and i found this in the makefile.inc1
On 05/19/2012 09:18 AM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
As it says, you need CPUTYPE?=nocona instead of CPUTYPE=nocona in
/etc/make.conf or /etc/src.conf; otherwise the build process chokes
while building the 32-bit compatibility stuff, since it cannot override
your 64-bit CPU selection with a 32-bit
On 05/19/2012 02:28 PM, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/17/12 07:54, Любомир Григоров wrote:
We have to wait, unfortunately. I am using a Linux partition with Wine
meanwhile. As long as it's not mainstream, it will be hard to do. Not to
mention port is at 1.4.
FreeBSD have 2 wine- ports. :)
On 05/17/2012 05:36 PM, Vance Siemens wrote:
http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-apple-quality.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On 05/11/2012 10:47 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Is there something else I should try to find in the index or table of
contents that would be in the third edition but not the fourth? Can you
give me some examples of the sorts of things you'd expect to find in the
table of contents that is lacking in
On 05/11/2012 12:11 PM, Edward M wrote:
So far I think I found a few that may make a difference. According
to the table of contents in the 4th edition in the chapter called
Booting and shuting down it
only shows entries for: red hat, HP-UX, AIX, SUSE,Ubuntu. However
in the third edition
On 05/11/2012 05:18 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
I appreciate the time you put into this.
It was no problem at all:-)
had fun comparing.
Now that I'm free and have more time I went over the 3rd edition
table of contents and found a few instances
that mentions FreeBSD. In chapter Adding
On 05/10/2012 03:45 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Regarding Nemeth's I am undecided between the 4th (Unix Linux) or
the 3rd. Please advise.
i purchased the third edition because I took a look in the 4th the
table of contents
and it appears anything FreeBSD related was remove and
On 04/30/2012 10:58 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Reading_both_ of McKusick's Design of .. books, and the 'Unix System
Admininstration Handbook', by Nemeth, et al. is a good_start_.
Having a bunch of the books from O'Reilley Assoc. (http://www.ora.com),
especially for 'standard' tools that you
On 04/30/2012 05:52 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
The filesystems are mostly arbitrary. You really only need the rootfs
with appropriate directories underneath. The list provided is simply
a concise idealized layout.
Thanks!. I will try creating different filesytems to further my
On 05/01/2012 06:43 AM, Polytropon wrote:
Except buying (good) books, you can also search for
articles on the web. For example, A Fast File System
for UNIX by M. K. McKusick is very interesting (at
least it was for me when I lost all my important data).
Some fs-related articles here:
On 04/30/2012 08:38 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
just not very helpful or fun. This attitude will get
He is helping,you need to learn how UFS, jails, nullfs,
journaling, disk I/O and other stuff work.
I have been following this thread and i must admit I also need to
learn more on
On 04/30/2012 10:22 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Oh, please! He's not helping anyone. He's just being an obnoxious
prick that thinks that by pointing out a lot of technical blabber and
some cheap philosophical posé
I guess i was going according to the fact that i have followed his
Hi,
I was running FreeBSD 9.0 using ZFS with the following setup on one
harddrive:
*(5) Create appropriate filesystems (feel free to improvise!).*
zfs create zroot/usr
zfs create zroot/usr/home
zfs create zroot/var
zfs create-o compression=on-o exec=on-o setuid=off zroot/tmp
zfs create-o
On 04/28/2012 11:16 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
That is what worries me, is that it wasn't just some random bit or
cosmic ray, but the potential of happening again. I am not so sure
that it is*impossible* that a jail could affect other jails with
EzJail.
Sorry I'm late to the party. How
On 04/08/2012 05:40 AM, Tony wrote:
Hello!
As much as I love FreeBSD, I'm a bit alarmed by its webdesign / corporate
identity. Since FreeBSD is the world's best OS, I believe it should have a
design that reflects this. A design that is so neutral and stripped of any
unnecessary details that the
On 03/25/2012 04:36 PM, Stanley Aisi wrote:
hi there,
i need your help in freebsd
regards,
Stanley
papua new guinea
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
/etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe
I think this would not let the user to login,etc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
/etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe
I think this would not let the user
On 03/12/2012 03:47 PM, Edward M. wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
/etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe
I
?
On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
/etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe
I think this would not let the user to login
On 03/05/2012 12:42 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Build the port on amd64 and install it on i386 as a package.
Is it possible? Pointers? Handholding? How-to?
http://filipenf.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/cross-compiling-for-x86-in-freebsd-64-bit/
___
On 03/04/2012 12:27 AM, jb wrote:
But ..., the charm disappeared when I (intentionally ?) pulled ethernet plug
and started update manager ...
Classic example of fallacious reasoning. update manager needs the
internet to access the updates
___
38 matches
Mail list logo
