HOW large is the directory?
ls | wc -l
On Nov 28, 2007 7:44 AM, Mark Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No we are not using NIS.
it is a large directory i am listing. actually it is the /usr/home
directory, and is probably the largest on the system. However ls -l runs
for close to six
I'll take up the challenge. Hitler was evil. Quoting Hitler is not.
When we seek to suppress information, no matter how troubling, we obscure
the very lessons of history we need most to learn. If, because Hitler was
evil, we do not allow discussion of him, how will future generations learn
Two nics, same subnet..problems exist in that configuration now and again.
Im betting offhand that the traffic came in port B, but port A has the
default route for the subnet, and thats where it left the box.
On Nov 20, 2007 10:37 AM, Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loren M. Lang
Whats the max file size you can create under 6.1?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The difficulty for my moving the last of my Linux boxes, is...iscsi support.
God how I wish I could map luns, boot from luns, and share lun love with my
other freebsd boxes.
Im starting on another venture, that I -want- on FreeBSD, but likely will
not be able to, because I cant use iscsi on it.
Did you know that most oh my god RAID failures happen during the
reconstruction of a failed drive?
.Especially on SATA as the non-recoverable-bit-error math is so much
easier to run into.
I think..that on a 500G drive, there are enough bits to read/write
that mathematically you could run into a
be less reliable than on SCSI???
Where d'you read that anyway??
Jeff Mohler wrote:
Did you know that most oh my god RAID failures happen during the
reconstruction of a failed drive?
.Especially on SATA as the non-recoverable-bit-error math is so much
easier to run into.
I think
On 10/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 13:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: confirm 3454f2d8611cde291b81fa177d2434593f5e6d36
What a great way of stating my non-idiot credentials :)
___
Nah..youre just
On 9/27/07, icantthinkofone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found I am having this problem, too. I can access every other
site I visit, both large and small. 'make fetchindex' no longer works,
eg, it times out. As does 'fetch www.freebsd.org/docs' as suggested.
---
Well dang..
I tried
Well..where is the mac you want to firewall from/against?
On 9/24/07, Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am sorry if this is a no-brainer
Is there anyway to make a rule in IPFW that will match MAC addresses
instead
of IP or port numnbers (and no, I didnt see anything in
Tell us what your workload IS..that will help a lot.
Its not necessarily MB/sec, but disk IO's per second.
Such as..if you have 5 servers with applications creating 100 IOPS on the
local drive, then you need a RAID array capable of at least 500 IOPS at
under 20ms to remain happy with it.
You
Youre pretty much going to require an AMD setup for that.
On 8/30/07, User Bobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an IBM xSeries 350 4xPIII with 5.5gb of RAM, and see that only
about 3.5gb is being used under the i386 port. I've been looking through
the
archives to try and figure out what
On 8/28/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:52:51PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Have you tried linking libm.so to libm.so.2?
Sorry, but that's really bogus advice.
Kris
It would work for MacGuyver or the A-Team...
*heh*
DONT remove that.its normal.
On 8/26/07, Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if you get this question a lot - a few searches didn't find
results for me.
I have a /bin/[ file in my system - I just want to make sure it's
not a sign of someone having hacked my machine.
How are you trying to access it?
Stone knives and bearskins?
Telnet?
SSH?
Soup cans and string?
Maybe you used the wrong color cable.
On 8/14/07, Steve O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To whom it may concern,
I setup a FreeBsd 7.0 server and cannot access it remotely with Windows
Vista
.
--
*From:* Jeff Mohler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:19 PM
*To:* Steve O'Connor
*Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject:* Re: Major Bug
How are you trying to access it?
Stone knives and bearskins?
Telnet?
SSH?
Soup cans and string?
Maybe you used
Vista or Mac or BSD servers.
--
*From:* Jeff Mohler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:25 PM
*To:* Steve O'Connor
*Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
*Subject:* Re: Major Bug
Did you set the default route correctly so that you can see
The EDGE is faster byte wise, not the center.
The distance between traditional or perpendicular sectors remains the same,
just more of them around the drive at a given distance from the center, than
at the center. So..because RPM remains the same at all distances from the
center, you will read
Dick:
It would have been graceful to say nothing in the sense that you dont KNOW
the answer, than point out that there are differences.
On 7/15/07, Dick Hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael B Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm a C developer. I normally use Linux but I'm trying
Yup..and it goes back to my original point.
If it saves $5/box times 100,000 units and they charge you the same for the
box rental/purchase, its a good business decision.
On 7/14/07, fbsd2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is right off the cable internet service providers website.
Plan Name
Do you have more than 10Mbit/sec of cable internet bandwidth available?
I dont see it as a problem if you dont, but if you have 20Mbit/sec of
internet, then ya..
If it saves then $5 a unit, for 10,000 units, no harm.
On 7/11/07, fbsd2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comclark cable in Angeles City
Am I using both CPUs as I should when I look at this from top?
PIDUID THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
COMMAND
11 0 1 171 52 0K 8K CPU1 0 0:00 99.56% idle:
cpu1
12 0 1 171 52 0K 8K RUN0 666.2H 78.81%
Is there a free NDMP tool for Freebsd?
On 5/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm presently backing up two servers in a remote location to a usb
drive
located elsewhere
45MB/sec is too fast for GigE?
Wha?
On 5/9/07, Chris Slothouber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2007-05-09 08:21, Andreas Widerøe Andersen wrote:
I'm planning a new fileserver for my post-production facility and need
some
input regarding
Chris: Accept my fallin on my sword..I didnt see your reply before I sent.
;)
On 5/9/07, Chris Slothouber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2007-05-09 10:12, Andreas Widerøe Andersen wrote:
On 5/9/07, Chris Slothouber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
The _main_ think I can think of, is windows in a SINGLE threaded movement of
data via CIFS, is gonna limit you to about 17MB/sec.
Andreas..have you tested this via CIFS/Redirector and been able to sustain
the performance that you need before going with Samba (another performance
layer issue)
On
Is that working?
If it is..seems you nailed it.
On 5/2/07, Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two servers that have to have their time synchronized between the
two to within one second. What is recommended?
Currently, I have ntpd running on one and have the other synchronizing
it's
Serving home directories, you end up with tons.
One marketting dude creates a 10Mb PPT slide, sends it to 10 people that
forward it to 2 more each...
Next thing you know you have dozens of copies of thousands of the same
documents sitting in deep storage home directories, taking up space.
In
It can if your storage appliance supports ASIS. Some even operate at the
block level, not just the file level.
On 4/26/07, GARRISON, TRAVIS J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Nicole
I dont think subject tagging is poor at all.
whats poor is overly long poorly organized subject lines..but hey..[FBSDQ]
aint all that long.
On 4/25/07, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amarendra Godbole wrote:
I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to
visually
Was your 17mb/sec a drag drop from a windows client?
17Mb/sec is about right, as Windows deals with that as a single threaded I/O
operation.
You can stuff a GigE pipe from a windows machine to a netapp or some other
solid CIFS server if you can fire up multiple threads to copy with.
So..dont
You measure the time between kicking it, and someone catching it, I think.
No..thats hangtime.
Try: uptime
On 3/23/07, Stan Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi;
How do I determine the uptime of my server?
Thanks,
Stan2
-
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out
My output to your commands is identical to yours in that it was found, and
is the same open-motif version.
:( :(
On 3/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/03/07, Jeff Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error:
error while loading shared libraries: libXm.so.3: cannot
For kicks I copied to to /usr/lib.
NEW error..
error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libXm.so.3: ELF file OS ABI
invalid
On 3/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/03/07, Jeff Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error:
error while loading shared libraries
The error:
error while loading shared libraries: libXm.so.3: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
Ive done a few searches, and installing open-motif seemed to be the right
answer, but isnt getting me anywhere.
Ideas/suggestions?
Has anyone ever run Net Backup under Linux emulation?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be a facinating experiment if a lrge group of Fbsd users at
1000s of hosts were recruited as supporters to the Fbsd Organization..to
host some subset of critical files.
It would be super neato if you could configure what you wished to donate via
a tool that would populate your box
Oh ya..i agree. I was being a futurist, not a realist.
On 2/25/07, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Chris Slothouber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: Could we get the
How about one large raid, and two partitions to serve each purpose?
Being so limited in HW, youre either going to take a _huge_
performance hit with only 2 disks per raid (unless Raid0), or an
availability hit with everything on one RAID set.
But..considering the costs of adding RAID to a
Ive never understood why we still partition drives so much..its one
spindle..sure, a hige filesystem might cause an edge performance
issue..but..its one spindle.
/ works.
?
If there is a fundamental reason why we still partition things like we
only have 10, 20, or 40Mb RLL. or slightly larger
requests for
the client, cuz everytime ../.. walks somewhere the client knows
nothing and it's all sent over the wire again. Over and over and
over.
Thats as much as I understand about it, freebsd-fs has great detail on
this bug.
On 1/11/07, Freminlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/01/07, Jeff
1 - To fix stuff that works in linux but goes to crap in freebsd, one
such example is NFS.
I don't actually have a problem with FreeBSD and NFS. This is using about
20+ clients and 2 NetApp filers. What problem are you having, rather than
just goes to crap?
---
If for example you do a make
hard..just that perhaps a decision was made
to let the linux community write the new code and Fbsd community would
polish it and/or emulate it once it was complete.
On 1/10/07, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Mohler wrote:
Not all of us can program..but let me ask this question.
Linux
Most of us are, understanding how we/it got here, IS positive.
What to do about it..is progress.
On 1/10/07, Bob McIsaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? -
This is a tired old thread
Please put it to bed
Don't keep it fed
Think
That only works if the target comes up within the 2min window that
SCSI allows for. It won't wait forever.
On 1/9/07, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 09), DAve said:
The developers response, for those who are interested.
hi Dave,
the initiator for iSCSI will
I never said it was, my rather poor example (I said I was new to iSCSI)
was if a remote file system crashes, who should fsck it? The server
(Target) or the client (Initiator)?
---
Clearly, the initiator. It owns the filesystem. Its just a big
anonymous file on the target with no relevant
Fbsd needs SAN support before it can cope with
virtualization..virtualization requires a lot of disk..spindles..and
FCP/iSCSI is a great way to drive this condensation.
I mean..when you have to read this list, and see people wonder which
end of a SAN connection owns the responsibility for
If I could program my way out of a _paper bag_ I would. But I cant.
But ive helped drive some wonderful gifting Fbsd's way in my time..im
still a believer.
On 1/9/07, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/9/07, Jeff Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fbsd needs SAN support before it can
Not all of us can program..but let me ask this question.
Linux is all volunteer, how did it get so far ahead?
Granted I'll take ports over RPM's and such any day, but..ports hasnt
sucked up all of the Fbsd oxygen by itself in the last handful of
years.
On 1/9/07, Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Firstl..how much Netapp can you afford?:)
Id start here:
http://www.sitepoint.com/
On 12/17/06, Malcolm Fitzgerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I ask questions about the web hosting?
I am being asked to set-up a web site that will deliver video, a
youTube wannabe :-) So I'd like visit
Sure..just mount it as /newdisk or something.
On 12/11/06, perikillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi people.
I have one system running FreeBSD 6.1-p11 i have there a Raid-1 setup with
gmirror, is working very good stable, but i need to add another space not
for the raid, is for the
The directory size grew to accomodate the metadata required to list
the files within it.
You cant shrink it. You'll have to remove it and recreate it.
On 11/26/06, Peter Schuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Observe:
hyperion# ls -la
total 61634
drwxr-xr-x 2 xxx yyy 63047168 Nov 18
If he uses linux, there's probly a broken RPM for that.
On 11/18/06, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the last line on _any_ email on this list.
Aww c'mon guys! He asked very nicely, and he's obviously a non-techie. I
sent an un-sub for him; hopefully he can handle the
My dmesg matches yours Juha..
Would enabling Hyperthreading increase any of my processing power?
On 11/14/06, Juha Saarinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/15/06, Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like my hyperthreading is enabled and it is in the BIOS. I was
told there was
I thought that since we both had HTT tags in the CPU ID, that we had it.
;)
On 11/14/06, Juha Saarinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/15/06, Jeff Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dmesg matches yours Juha..
Would enabling Hyperthreading increase any of my processing power?
Well, if you
Im am _loving_ zabbix for this.
1.1 in ports works, 1.1.3 from the site works, 1.3 doesnt compile for
me cleanly at all..but what does work..does ALL of those things very
easily.
On 11/14/06, Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into a Network/Server monitoring application that
, Jeff Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that since we both had HTT tags in the CPU ID, that we had it.
Yeah, well... that's a funny thing that tag. Got it on my
first-generation 1.3GHz Pentium 4 as well. Makes me wonder if Intel
had that feature in the processors very early on, but only
Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to
ensure full update-ness?
On 11/13/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:39:16AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
When I switched to 6.0, then 6.1, it was noticed by most of my clients
that my
Im lovin it a lot more than Cacti...I had a graph charting by itself
in near real time within 10 minutes.
On 11/9/06, David Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
thats awesome news. Zabbix is really a great Product and should be
brought forward when possible.
Good Bye,
David
On Nov 10, 2006,
a graph of my localhost interface counts. I dont
wanna get into that here however.
Gimme a customer Pb of storage, and a SOW to configure it by...
PS: Betcha never heard of the middle aged blonde singer dude fromthe UK. :)
On 11/7/06, Howard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Mohler wrote:
I
I can use MRTG, and have MRTG do what I want it to do.
Id like to try cacti, but..am I alone in finding that it's a PITA?
Im not trying to be negative, just looking for a reality check.
I like the simplicity of mrtg, but I like the go back in time of
cacti to view performance data.
If its
If you dont have locking..check it. If you -cant- mount with -L option by hand.
On 11/4/06, Jeremy Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I currently attempting to build and install a world from my AMD64
machine to a i386 machine mounted via nfs on the build machine. I've
What museum is this in, can we visit it?
On 11/2/06, Karol Kwiatkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
anyone got 3Com 3c905B-COMBO network card (Fast EtherLink XL PCI)
working with 10base2/BNC?
I just bought one and I can't figure it out. It has BNC connector and
should be supported
It...should, its been about I dunno, 1994 since I used one of those tho.
It's possible that some code-creep got into the driver that just hasnt
been tested for a decade.
On 11/2/06, Karol Kwiatkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[format recovered]
On 02/11/2006 21:58, Jeff Mohler wrote:
On 11/2
I got bored, installed this on 5.3 with a Netapp F880.
Slow isnt the word..anyone else try this with similar results?
Like..max write speed is 600k/sec.
On 10/23/06, freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to have my mailboxes put on iSCSI (NetAPP).
I downloaded iscsi-17.5.tar.bz2
If I was to ask how much online storage space is required for
say..ftp.freebsd.org to hold _everything_ and then add in the kitchen
sink, how much space would that be.
Who are the admins of the ftp heiarchy these days?
Thanks.
___
Whats the error they reject with?
On 10/30/06, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
i'm trying to cvsup /usr/src from cvsup.au.freebsd.org, cvsup2.freebsd.org and
even 3. they are all rejecting my connections...
Is it that I stink ;) or something else is going on?
cheers :)
/var/log and delete anything you can there. Then
try fsck.
-Derek
At 07:26 PM 10/27/2006, Jeff Mohler wrote:
So..last night im workin away, and then the machine gets slow, then
stops responding to anything.
I can ping it, but no telnet, MailScanner has detected a possible fraud
Not if fsck wont fix it. ;( But..will give it a shot
On 10/28/06, Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be able to remove the bad drive leaving the good one in use.
-Derek
At 03:18 PM 10/28/2006, Jeff Mohler wrote:
Appears the issue is in the IBM servers RAID
So..last night im workin away, and then the machine gets slow, then
stops responding to anything.
I can ping it, but no telnet, www...anything. Hung hard. Last thing
I saw in a make buildworld was a 'cant write to filesystem' error..or
something like that but not a 'no room on device' error.
Can anyone answer these questions?
What size the NFS client attribute cache is?
Is it a per mount cache, or a systemwide cache?
Id appreciate any insight into these answers.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
hmm..Im running the latest code, but I dont see that file fastest_cvsup.
On 10/25/06, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 06:07, eoghan wrote:
On 25 Oct 2006, at 14:03, Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
eoghan wrote:
Hi
Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying:
Thanks muchly.
:)
On 10/26/06, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Mohler wrote:
hmm..Im running the latest code, but I dont see that file fastest_cvsup.
On 10/25/06, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 06:07, eoghan wrote:
On 25 Oct 2006, at 14:03
I was just there on 5.1 for the last few months..when I did a
kdump/ktrace, I saw invalid fnctl's just sucking things up.
I nailed it down to something in PHP, because I could trigger this
immediately by uploading photos to my coppermine installation, or
randomly with zencart.
Moving those
Are nic1 and nic2 on the same network?
Are client2 and nic2 on the same network?
Need a bigger picture with some detail.
On 10/23/06, Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I've two NIC on my server.
Until now I just use one. I want use the second interface to increase
perfs.
The
anything up.
On 10/23/06, Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 23/10/2006 à 13:09:21-0800, Jeff Mohler a écrit
Are nic1 and nic2 on the same network?
Are client2 and nic2 on the same network?
Yes all in same subnet, all connected on the same gigabits switch.
and all nfs traffic
Linux supports more devices than FreeBSD, especially new devices.
---
Linux clearly supports many more bugs than FreeBSD as well.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/06, Jeff Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux has iSCSI...which hands Fbsd a real beating in the server space.
I work on projects at more customers than I can keep track of that
-have- to use Linux in the middle of Fbsd farms just because of the
amazing lack
Linux has iSCSI...which hands Fbsd a real beating in the server space.
I work on projects at more customers than I can keep track of that
-have- to use Linux in the middle of Fbsd farms just because of the
amazing lack of iscsi support.
Linux has been doing iscsi since what..2002 or so? Maybe
Freebsd ever hope to have a stable supported iscsi layer?
Thanks for any hints.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
here at work we want to compile deep trees of code on Fbsd boxes, but
we are finding that the compiles on local disk are faster than via NFS
(very very fast/new Netapp boxes) on the FreeBSD boxes (single spindle
SATA drives).
However, cross-compiling the same code on a linux box over NFS to the
81 matches
Mail list logo
