Offtopic but since when is it ok the behave like this in the freebsd
mailing list. Really no need to get personal...
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:50 AM, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
If you cant cope with multiple operating systems and their differences you
are probably in the wrong job.
On 10
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:52:04AM -0500, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for 9.1-RELEASE to be
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Needing fsck because the drive is failing and not able to store and
retrieve data reliably any more is a whole different thing.
or bad data stored because of non-disk errors.
in this case any
On 21 jun. 2012, at 05:28, Waitman Gobble gobble...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Matthias Gamsjager
mgamsja...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Lynn Steven Killingsworth
blue.seahorse.syndic...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't seem to have generated much
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty.
And it works fast.
The correct answer would be. I depends on the work load
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Hooman Fazaeli hoomanfaza...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear community
In the past, I built a 8TB ZFS log server on freebsd 7.4.
However, the system experienced instablility after long up times.
My main motive to use ZFS was UFS inability to support large
file
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
For my various OpenSource projects, I have deployed a 36TB file system
which is fine and stable running 24/7. Additionally at home I use 4TB
(2x 2TB) + 8TB (2x 4TB) on a machine with 4GB RAM this has
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
I really want to see your face when you fsck 48TB w/o ffs+j (since that is
so young must be immature :S ) of data with the phone ring non stop with
Even if ZFS would be the only filesystem in existence i
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
answer yourself.
Sorry but I don;t follow you right there. with 48 disks you would not
mirror 24vs24.
if i wasn't clear enough then i would it like that (with UFS), and
assuming disks are named
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
interesting idea but the options ZFS would give you are superior to this
setup.
Were you just unable to understand my setup or a reasons to do this?
please reread former post and possibly ask again
On 21 jun. 2012, at 17:15, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
I do understand your setup but I dont have too agree that it is a good
so i would repeat my question.
Assume you have 48 disks, in mirrored configuration (24 mirrors) and 480
users with their data on
On 21 jun. 2012, at 18:07, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
stupid answer to stupid question.
You never seen - but they do happens.
In other topic you hammerd on fact and if someone ask you to deliver them
its a stupid question.
just a proof it is a waste of time
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Lynn Steven Killingsworth
blue.seahorse.syndic...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't seem to have generated much comment.
I suspect you are thinking as I do that if your servers don't immediately
download then their is a bandit on my Internet line??
Newer AMD
The Supermicro controllers listed by FreeBSD as supported seem to be
rebranded Adaptec controllers, and they are therefore also disqualified.
The supermicro usas-l8i
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USAS-L8i.cfm
uses a LSI chip (LSISAS 1068E SAS controller ) and works
Unfortunately, these cards fit just in supermicro motherboards, since
they have they are reversed/mirrored compared to normal PCIe cards.
(I have a Tyan S8005.)
--
Torbjörn
Well it's just the bracket. You can unmount it and replace it with
another bracket. The card is up side down thats
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Matthias Gamsjager
mgamsja...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, these cards fit just in supermicro motherboards, since
they have they are reversed/mirrored compared to normal PCIe cards.
(I have a Tyan S8005.)
--
Torbjörn
Well it's just the bracket. You can
FYI, I bought one for my Supermicro X7SB3 motherboard and it didn't work.
I had to end up buying an Intel SASUC8I which is just an OEM LSI
SAS3081E-
hmm strange because I have one running right here with the MPT driver.
even mptutils works with it.
And if you google it then you will find
Don't know why they do that. But be careful because HTX/HNC
(Hypertransport) connections are the same as PCIe but reversed
and incompatible, check it before plugin anything.
HTX is used to connect 2 motherboards via hypertransport (up to 51.2
GB/sec for now), connect expansion cards, etc...
Have you changed the cable?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hey Nick
Have you read the handbook which is a good starting point for most questions:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Nick Mackowski nmackow...@new.rr.com wrote:
Hi I have a Hp Pavillion dv8 with dual sata drives.
20 matches
Mail list logo
