On 25/09/2009 10:28 PM, Saifi Khan wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
i noticed that there is no Oracle available for FreeBSD
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
What could be the reason for that ?
Best ask direct of
Nicole Harrington wrote:
Hello all,
I have been building/using servers that were dual CPU
AMD Opteron systems for some time. (usually 246
Opteron cpu's)
Now of course the world is shifting to Dual Core.
Using FreeBSD, what is really the difference, besides
power and ability to shove in
Hi All,
I was wondering if any one had some ideas on my little problem / goal.
I have been testing out using a X-cygwin and my X server in windows XP
and FreeBSD / KDE as my X client via ssh, I really like this and was
thinking of using it at work for many reasons I don't want to have to
Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
Hello,
it is the first time I have to set up such configuration. Could you
tell me some guidelines? What should I care about? I see there's a
chapter in the Handbook about VPN. It mentions the FAST_IPSEC kernel
option in 5.X. Should I use this implemetation or the KAME
You can try out this script if you like, it may or may not help.
I created it so I could more easily remember all the VPN knobs that need
to be touched when creating a VPN.
http://www.roq.com/projects/vpnsetup/vpnsetup.pl
Mike
Subhro wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to connect to my workplace
Yance Kowara wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to figure out if *BSD can achieve this:
I have two DSL connections to play with, and I would
like to configure a *BSD router that can combine the
two DSLs together.
There is a howto at
http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000173.php
But it
Gary Kline wrote:
Folks,
When I bought this bare-bones box and plugged in stuff
it took several days of figuring out what benchmark and
other utilities to run to stress it. After a few weeks of
pushing the load to 70+, the burning-in was a fair indicator
that the HW
If you want to try an different Desktop replacement OS over Windows XP I
would say you would have better luck with something like Linspire.
But the truth is there isn't much difference at all between any Linux
distribution or FreeBSD and when I see the latest Linux review on some
of those so
Kiffin Gish wrote:
I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 6.0 and noticed the introduction of
option SCHED_ULE for supporting multi-processor environments.
However, I understood that using SCHED_ULE with only one CPU can also
improve performance significantly.
Is this true, and if so, what are the
What about just turning on Polling?
I have polling turned out for a router and all I get is gigabit performance.
I have tested it with a wire variety of tests from basic fetch tests
from a FreeBSD client box via a FreeBSD router (with polling) to
another FreeBSD box and all I got was gigabit
Monah Baki wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed Freebsd 5.4 with samba 3.x, I'm running a calyx
software, and the 6 clients are winxp.
The smb.conf is as simple as possible. I noticed that some clients
are very slow to connect to the share drive and run a database search.
The server is a dell
daniel wrote:
Our company has a few very large databases (9gb) which required a shut down,
upgrade and restart last night, it this act has caused me all manour of
headache:
1. I did a full backup of all the data (Good Idea)
2. I ran mysqladmin -uroot -p shutdown
3. I waited... and
Just in case you missed it, try the Apache 2.2 port. I been using it and
its great.
/usr/ports/www/apache22/
Mike
Douglas A. Maske wrote:
Hi,
Just curious why this port isn't properly building? I had to manually
compile apr and apr-utl, then manually put the include files in place,
and
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-12-02 14:00, Michael Vince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 6 Linux threads from my benchmarking and from what I have seen
some peoples posts gives poor performance compared to libthr or
libpthread I am using more of libthr over libpthread in 6.0 and have
been
Michael Vince wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-12-02 14:00, Michael Vince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 6 Linux threads from my benchmarking and from what I have seen
some peoples posts gives poor performance compared to libthr or
libpthread I am using more of libthr over libpthread
For 6 Linux threads from my benchmarking and from what I have seen some
peoples posts gives poor performance compared to libthr or libpthread
I am using more of libthr over libpthread in 6.0 and have been
benchmarking best results.
Try this in /etc/libmap.conf
[mysqld]
libpthread.so.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone point me to a surefire how-to to get tomcat java apache running
on a FreeBSD 5.3R box.
Here are the current setup.
OS : FreeBSD 5.3R
Apache 2.0.50
Tomcat 5.0.28
mod_jk - seems to be 1.2.5
java - jdk1.4.2
Thanks,
Ed
Your best off using mod_proxy to
JD Bronson wrote:
I dont want to start a flame/war here...but was *just* wondering...
I currently use OpenBSD-3.8 for my router (T-1 with many statics) and
then use FreeBSD-6.0 for my servers (web/mail/DNS...)
I am debating on just standardizing to all FreeBSD.
It seems the security is
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Admittedly if Microsoft were trying to make Windows XP run well
on a 486
it wouldn't be nearly as a likable OS it is today.
That's not true either. If Microsoft were trying to make it work on a
486 it
would run a lot better on bigger hardware because they would
I prefer the idea of the FreeBSD team aiming at only the latest
hardware, all I use is brand new server equipment.
I don't like the idea that FreeBSD features and performance development
could be hampered by the core guys trying to make stuff work on old
hardware, in fact if it was a fact that
Gayn Winters wrote:
There are some things broken in 5.4 that are still broken in 6.0
with regards to support of older hardware. In particular the ida
driver is a mess - EISA support in that was busted years ago,
then 5.X busted support for more 'modern' systems like the
Compaq 1600R HP DL
Tim Holmes wrote:
I've finally decided to add wireless to my gateway. It's already doing
all my gateway and firewall duties, and more and more people are coming
over with wireless devices and I'd like to offer them the option of using
my network. Instead of buying a wireless router, I plan to
A cvsup and make buildworld, make installworld will NOT work in 4.3 its
simply to old a version. I had the same problem my self, and its in one of
the errata's and mailing lists that its not possible.
What I did was do buildworld on another machine (A fbsd v4.6 server) and
then tared up the
23 matches
Mail list logo
