This might well be an instance of a link-farming scam against high-pagerank
web sites, in which web pages are passed through Google Translate and then
your return link then boosts ad revenues for the target site.
(We get a lot of these e-mails at cl.cam.ac.uk due to high page rank -- the
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, sean connolly wrote:
Automatic reporting would end up being a mess given that panics can be
caused by hardware problems. Having an autoreport check if memtest was run
before it reports, or having it only run with -CURRENTmight be useful.
Hi Sean, Dan, et al:
I'm not
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
I have installed a new server to test performance results. BIOS and RAID
BIOS is the latest in this server ( Raid controller is a Intel SRCSASBB8I )
Hi Omer--
Comparing I/O and file system performance is a bit fraught with peril,
especially given
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, tethys ocean wrote:
In server jail and squid is running on it as lots of another packet. i want
to extract iso image in this server. But i havent do it.
You are correct that direct manipulation of md(4) devices is not allowed in
jail. However, you may be running on a
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Kris Kennaway ???(??):
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Kris Kennaway ???(??):
Well, I mean kernel backtrace.
Can I obtain that remotely and without restarting/panicking the box?
Thanks,
kgdb on /dev/mem or procstat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ (107)
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Chris wrote:
Ironically the latest server I got last night has a intel pro 1000 a rarity
:)
I am just giving feedback as when I speak to people in the datacentre and
hosting business the biggest gripe with freebsd is hardware compatability,
as I adore freebsd I ignore
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
--On Monday, January 14, 2008 02:23:47 PM + Robert Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like very much to get at least the kernel parts of an AFS client into
the base system.
That may well be realistic for arla, though I believe
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Jason C. Wells wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working
under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or
something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, Elliot Finley wrote:
in the kernel and I'm still unable to obtain a crash dump. Hopefully there
is enough info in this email for a hacker to point me in the right direction
to debug this.
If you're unable to obtain a crash dump, you should still be able to use
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:28:51AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
A program (a TclX' self-test script) works fine in a normal environment,
but fails to renice itself, when running in jail (as root):
nice-1.8 nice tests FAILED
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, O. Hartmann wrote:
On my lab's FreeBSD 6.2/i386 box (ASUS P4P800, ICH5 with two SATA 150 ports,
two SATA 300 drives attached) I copied big files (~ 5GB) from one drive to
another while the box didn't do anything else than copying. I watched the
copy process via 'systat
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Vishal Patil wrote:
Could someone point me to an example that shows a SIMPLE network protocol
implemented over TCP/IP inside the FreeBSD kernel. I think I could look at
the NFS client driver but is there an example simpler than that. Also is
there a guide explaining how to
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Kevin Sanders wrote:
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less configuration
is the best option out there. The ability to quickly go through series of
hands/reboots without any associated fsck runs
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Atom Powers wrote:
On 10/21/06, David Stanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm simply trying to set ACLs on a few directories but don't see an option
to recursively apply this to the whole directory's contents. Does applying
the ACL to a directory inherently apply it to all
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I think it's only device drivers, I've not heard of anything else in
anywhere, other than 3rd party programs that might be in the ports, that do
this.
In the base system, binary parts definitely only for device drivers. A quick
find for .uu
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Natalie Sugako wrote:
I want to use audit events on FreeBSD6.1-BETA4. I read that I must build
kernel with option: options AUDIT (FreeBSD handbook). But config
(/usr/sbin/config) find next error: unknown option AUDIT Maybe, option was
renamed? Help me, PLS! Thanks
FYI:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 12:05:25 AM, you wrote:
FYI: Support for audit has now been merged to the 6-STABLE branch for
inclusion in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE in the next month. The 6.1-BETA1 image
includes basic audit support; it will be significantly
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Duane Whitty wrote:
Started doing a little reading on the UFS and UFS2 file systems. I'm just
wondering if all types of files have extended attribute blocks available
including named pipes, sockets, and device files?
Is it still the case that there are three unused
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Simon Ironside wrote:
/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC has this line uncommented - is this on purpose? I
commented it out before building a new kernel.
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
This was by accident, but actually isn't a bad idea. We discovered the
problem at the last minute, after
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ian Lord wrote:
Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ?
I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was clear ULE was a
better alternative for performance then 4BSD
Schedulers are one of the hardest things to do right in OS design, as they
rely a great deal
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Can this be explained by anything other than a (nasty) bug?
% ls -la audio/shorten/files
total 0
% rmdir audio/shorten/files
rmdir: audio/shorten/files: Directory not empty
This is on 5.4-stable from July 21 -- up
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 06:51 am, Robert Watson wrote:
= Have you recently experienced a system crash or hard reboot without proper
= shutdown?
According to dmesg.boot, this filesystem was flagged as not properly
dismounted back
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, O. Hartmann wrote:
I did a cvsupdate several minutes before and tried to build world. A
buildworld stops as shown below in building libkvm.
This is believed to now be fixed with an updated kvm_proc.c. If not,
please let me know.
Also, the system is really instable
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, O. Hartmann wrote:
Also, the system is really instable after I build the kernel for itself.
Under heavy load, the machine get stuck and freezes.
I have no more informations due to remote control of the system.
Do you have approximate before/after dates for when
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Peter Risdon wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 14:23 +0200, Simonas Kareiva wrote:
[...]
The problem is, that the nfs server hangs after running for a while,
like, 20 minutes. Any file operations (at the nfs mount points and
below) hang on the ftp server too, making
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Kara Chapman wrote:
Thanks for your help -- that seems to have fixed the problem. You
mentioned that it was only a temporary fix, so what do you suggest doing
now? Is this a bug that I should report?
FYI, the error below is probably not causing actual problems, but we
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Jon Drews wrote:
What does sbwait mean in top? Is it related to a sysctl setting? I have
looked in the man page for top, at William LeFebvres site (
http://www.groupsys.com/top ), in Evi Nemeth's UNIX System
Administration Handbook and Googled in general. Does anyone
be
frobbed fairly safely as part of testing.
Robert N M Watson
Thanks!
--Nick Pavlica
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:52:38 + (GMT), Robert Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I/O (reads, writes at fairly large multiples of the sector
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I/O (reads, writes at fairly large multiples of the sector size -- 512k is
a good number) and small I/O size (512 bytes is good). This will help
identify the source along two dimmensions: are we looking at a basic
storage I/O problem that's present
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
The move to an MPSAFE VFS will help with that a lot, I should think.
Do you know if this will find it's way to 5.x in the near future?
Hopefully not too quickly, it's fairly experimental. I know there's
interest in getting it into 5.x however.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 01:47 PM 26/01/2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
With the recent release of 4.11 I thought that I would give it a
Yes, I found the same thing basically. My test box is a P4 3Ghz with 2G
of RAM on a 3ware 8605 controller with 4 drives in RAID5.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Robert Watson wrote:
While it's not for the feint of heart, it might be interesting to see
how results compare in 6-CURRENT + debugging of various sorts (including
malloc) turned off, and debug.mpsafevfs turned on. One possible issue
with the twe/twa drivers
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
Is anybody besides *me* having file system corruption problems with
FreeBSD 5.3? I've looked around on several of the mailing lists and
found no men- tion of this.
I have two different platforms on which I'm trying to run FreeBSD 5.3.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I found this in the messages log when snort died:
Jan 26 03:19:34 buttercup2 /kernel: pid 53186 (snort), uid 0: exited on
signal 4
There was no core dump. Is there a way to figure out what the cause of
the sigill was?
Not easily without the
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Boris Popov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 08:50:02PM +0300, Igor B. Bykhalo wrote:
Looks like the follwoing commit broke net/mars_nwe port
on my RELENG_4 file server box:
Yes, it seems to be. Mars_nwe have different idea about
added macro:
# define
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Robert Watson writes:
RW All I know is that the XP bits don't crash every week, they crash every
RW three weeks. :-) My NT4 box crashed almost continuously.
I have three machines, running FreeBSD, NT, and XP. All of them will
run until I
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Mark wrote:
FreeBSD will run for years without a boot in many cases.
Ah, this point fascinates me. Running for years? Do you ever have to
recompile your kernel? :)
The longest personal uptime I've had is just under two years, and that was
for a UPS-backed natbox in my
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know what are the plans, for locking mechanism like
GIANT-LOCK in future 5.3 Releases? I have heard from many people that
this GIANT-Locking mechanism is not the best thing to have! Some said
that it may be replaced. Some also said
, and the
newest intel chipsets (not that new) don't work in 4.10, redering is useless
with the newer intel processors. To quote Robert watson of the Freebsd
core team who posted to this list on Nov 11, 2004:
The statement you quote below does not mean that FreeBSD 5.3 is
inappropriate for use
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Jay Teutenberg wrote:
We are up against an interesting problem.
We have several FBSD servers, the ones that are 5.x do not seem to be
able to respond to pings larger than 25152, but 4.x kernels can.
We are getting I/O errors from sendmail and want to make sure our
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Bob Hall wrote:
I keep getting the message
dhclient: send_packet: Permission denied
I believe this is actually a bug/feature in dhclient, which is trying to
send a packet from an IP address that it has a lease for, but isn't
configured on the network interface. The
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Entertainingly, at the company I work at, we only recently moved from
Windows NT 4 to Windows XP, despite the dramatic improvements in Windows
between those systems...
dramatic improvements in XP over NT4? Robert, are you ill? ;-)
ipfw rule set include log actions?
Robert Watson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've been searching, and not finding, settings to use on the port of a
portmaster so that it will act as a proper serial console ... I swear I
saved it the last time it went around the lists ... can someone please
send me the settings?
I'm using
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I just picked up a PM25 for our colo facility, so that I can do remote
admin on the FreeBSD boxes ... our two Tyan servers are a piece of cake,
as they have DB9 Serial, like I'd expect ... but the Intel motherboards
have External RJ45 serial,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Giuliano Cardozo Medalha wrote:
I got some messages for my customized kernel, using IPsec and IPv6:
WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
My kernel have the following option:
options NET_WITH_GIANT
How is possible to correct this
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I got some messages for my customized kernel, using IPsec and IPv6:
WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
My kernel have the following option:
options NET_WITH_GIANT
How is possible to correct
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Peter Harmsen wrote:
I'm trying to implement a Mandatory Access Controll setup, just like the
one in the example of the FreeBSD handbook:15.14 Implementing a Secure
Environment with MAC.The graphics card setup itself is very straight
forward and didn't cause any
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Gordon McKee wrote:
I am running 6-CURRENT just as a test server - it is not doing anything
really. Now when the systems boots it gets to the login prompt the I
get the following error:
panic: free: address 0xd4d91cb0(0xd4d91000) has not been allocated.
Does any
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's happening here? I can download at 1mBps from my crappy P200 MMX
w/ freebsd 4.10 at my lan. This server is a Dual Xeon 2.4Ghz w/ 2GB ram
and a decent hdd. It should saturate the 100mbps, but won't go past
130kB/s.
That's very slow.
Could
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given these results, I would conclude that the raw routing stack in 5.3
is 35-40% slower than its 4.x counterpart.
The tests are easy enough to duplicate, so there is no reason to
question the numbers. Feel free to try it yourself. Obviously
I have access to several boxes that support BIOS console redirection, in
which access to the BIOS and BIOS-based console I/O is redirected to a
serial port. This is pretty neat functionality, as it allows me to
reconfigure RAID arrays, change a variety of system settings, boot
preferences, etc,
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
I am getting the following error in vi pretty consistently:
Error: input: Resource temporarily unavailable
Usually I get this at every attempt I make to run vi. Every now and
then I'll somehow manage to stay in vi however long I want. It
I'm attempting to get PPTP set up between a Mac OS X 10.3.3 client using
the VPN tool in Internet Connect and a FreeBSD 4.10-BETA box running mpd.
I don't have a whole lot of experience with this, so it could well be I'm
doing something stupid. However, the problem seems fairly consistent
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Karl Pielorz wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Karl Pielorz wrote:
I've just setup a FreeBSD tunnel (we've tried both gif and tun [via
nos-tun]) now between two fairly large networks of machines...
What version of FreeBSD are you using? If using FreeBSD 5.x, you may
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Karl Pielorz wrote:
I've just setup a FreeBSD tunnel (we've tried both gif and tun [via
nos-tun]) now between two fairly large networks of machines...
What version of FreeBSD are you using? If using FreeBSD 5.x, you may well
want to switch to 4.x for at least one more
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, David Cramblett wrote:
I have problem with X on 5.2-RC2. Sometimes the whole
system hangs when I start X by startx or 'setpmac mls/equal startx'
(with MAC policies loaded). In about 30% of attempts it hangs on
XFree startup messages and hard reset is required.
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Are you sure you mean 5.1RC1 (and not 5.2-RC1)? This bug (PR 55473) was
definitely present in 5.1-release and I have seen reports that it was
still present in 5.1-current within the last few months.
Sory, it is 5.1RC2.
If you're really sure
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, paul van den bergen wrote:
on freebsd-hackers, Alfred Perlstein posted a method that allows
boot-disk-less installation... but it requires mdconfig, a 5.1
utility...
is there a method to do this under 4.8?
it seems to me that the job performed by md0 could be done
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Fabian Thylmann wrote:
I have a heavily used threaded server program running on one of my Dell
Poweredge 1750 servers. Its a statistical analysis package for websites.
Currently it analyses over 60 million requests a day, which (because of
many different reasons) causes it
- Original Message -
From: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fabian Thylmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: inode state
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Fabian Thylmann wrote:
I have a heavily used threaded server program running
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Denis Troshin wrote:
Almost every package I install requires a few other packages. This 'idea
of using dependent packages' turns FreeBSD (and other unix-systems) to
an ugly monster.
For example, I don't need Perl or Python but a few packages I install
require them.
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Charles Howse wrote:
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE, no gui.
In Linux, I can left-drag to select text in the console, then
right-click to paste it to the command line. My FreeBSD Unleashed book
says the mouse can be configured to copy and paste from the console in
FreeBSD, but
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Alfonso Romero wrote:
I´m installing FreeBSD 4.8 on a 8GB HDD, but it has some bad sectors.
How can I tell FreeBSD not to use these bad sectors?
If the bad blocks are not under any vital file system meta-data (boot
blocks, inodes, et al), you can use the badsect(8)
. I proceeded to try getfacl and setfacl.
getfacl returned the default settings (just stat() in ACL form according
to Robert Watson), however, no matter what I tried all I could get with
setfacl -m g:mail:rwx testfile was:
setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported
I thought
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Petri Helenius wrote:
David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I seem to get kmem_map too small panics when using large buffers with
bpf. Is there a tunable I should be increasing?
Yes, increase KVA_PAGES in your kernel config.
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Dan Pelleg wrote:
I'm trying to use setfacl - just the example that's in the manpage. All
I ever get is: setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported
This error generally results from three cases:
(1) UFS_ACL isn't enabled
(2) Extended attributes aren't
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Roman V. Mashak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:07:43PM -0400, Steve Kudlak wrote:
project and mucking with the low grade in my opinion C-2 security
that Sun OSes had and finding bugs in things like FTP logging and
the like. I now do other
68 matches
Mail list logo
