On 4/1/2013 5:23 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
One does not have to be a lawyer to know the lack of any license verbiage
embedded in computer programs released to the public becomes property of public
domain forever. Putting license verbiage on your next port version is
unenforceable because it's already
On 12/11/2012 1:52 AM, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
Similarly, I'm a bit concerned that 9.0 loses support at the end of
January, but there is no release date for 9.1 (at
On 6/19/2012 4:06 PM, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
BSDL in opposite is often criticized a rape me license.
No, it is not, except perhaps by lying atheist Marxist bastards and his
religious adherents.
Please don't use atheist as a derogatory term. There are plenty of
capitalistic
On 3/2/2012 11:57 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 28/02/2012 03:24, Stephen Cook wrote:
I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on
cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g.
setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc
Hello all!
I'm relatively new to FreeBSD but I'm enjoying it so far.
I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on
cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g.
setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc).
Here's the list
On 2/18/2012 8:03 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
On Sunday 19 February 2012 04:34:17 Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:07:30PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
So, Polytropon's three choice pattern is good. Or, I could even
suggest just two choices.
A normal user will use the first
