Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 21:15:55, jerrymc wrote about Re: Boot2 loading
process:
So my question is: where does the rest of the boot2 binary is located and
how is it loaded ?
You skipped boot1 from attention. boot2 is loaded by boot1, not boot0.
Not according to that piece of architecture
Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:33:06, netch wrote about Re: Boot2 loading process:
Not according to that piece of architecture documentation that was quoted.
www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/book.html#BOOT-BOOT0
It says that boot1 is used only with floppy boots.
The doc is
Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 09:41:01, jan.pfeifer wrote about Boot2 loading
process:
I was reading through the architecture handbook
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/book.html)
about the boot process, and something strange caught my attention.
According to the
Sun, May 01, 2005 at 23:07:36, vizion wrote about Ignorance and file
suffixes:
I have tried unsuccessfuly to find out from the manual what the suffixes
mean on the files collected by cvsup (e.g. v) is there a reference for
such info?
,v is RCS and CVS suffix. You can use CVS (`info cvs')
Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 16:38:18, atkielski.anthony wrote about Re: WEIRD:
telnet:
1. Telnet can use any ports providing the user redirects.
2. Telnet passes clear text no matter what.
3. ssh ought to be used to replace Telnet whenever possible.
4. ssh also can be made to work with any port
Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 13:04:59, fquest wrote about boot up notification:
I would like one of my servers to send me an email when
it boots. I envision a script in rc.conf to do this.
This is too bad, as rc.conf is called tens times during boot.
Is there an easier way, or an automatic system
Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 03:43:25, mr_bond_james_bond_007 wrote about new:
sir i am new in BSD
i think this is the UNIX operating system and it's free ? to use ? or what ?
Generally isn't strict Unix, only unix-like, but in real this difference
makes taste only for world of High Technology
Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:56:09, gesmith wrote about Keeping ports and FreeBSD
up-to-date without X:
Anytime I start to update my system, FreeBSD 5.3, applications that I
compiled explicitly, -DWITHOUT_X, will try to compile X during the
upgrade. Is there an easier way aroung this without
Hi,
Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 15:21:47, madhvin wrote about Windows-based RFC868
Time:
I am trying to replace a Windows server with a FreeBSD one .
Does anyone know the equivalent UNIX package for a Windows-based RFC868 Time
Protocol server.
Thanx in advance for your response
timed and inetd
Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 20:38:36, s.wingate (Steve Wingate) wrote about Re: Dualbooting
STABLE CURRENT:
I don't like the sound of that. I'll just stick with STABLE until 5.x is
really ready.
-STABLE will have the same problem since its in boot0 and the BIOS, not
the OS on the partition its
Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 15:57:22, useperl wrote about [freebsd] System calls: int $0x80
vs. lcall $7, $0:
éÚ×ÉÎÉÔÅ, ÚÄÅÓØ ÌÕÞÛÅ ÐÏ-ÒÕÓÓËÉ.
Gentlemen, I am new to FreeBSD programming and going to write a simple
program which will not use libc. I tried to find out how to make a
system
Sorry, it was reply to another maillist, which was in Bcc of original message.
Ignore it if you can't read ;)
Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:10:09, netch wrote about Re: [freebsd] System calls: int
$0x80 vs. lcall $7, $0:
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:10:09 +0200
From: Valentin Nechayev [EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
