and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to 13.0.1,
whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message appears
saying that Twitter.com is loading slowly, and the site is practically
unusable - clicking on any of the links has no effect.
i don't
Surely SpinRite is more clever than that,
i would bet otherwise. simple tools and free tools are always better
You continue to demonsteate that you don't know what you don't know.
are you another sponsored by some recovery tool commercial producer?
read attempts. In worst case, there will be gaps in the
result.
Surely SpinRite is more clever than that,
i would bet otherwise. simple tools and free tools are always better
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
totally in error. SpinRite will attempt to read a damage sector up to
2000 times and through different algorithms determine what is most
man dd
Even
SpinWrong is a scam, Gibson is a fraud, and this conversation is pure
marketing gibberish.
maybe you exaggerate but this is what i feel in that discussion. instead
of help - seemed like marketing.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Is there any such a tool (as fsck for FAT32) available for freeBSD? If so,
where would I find it?
fsck_msdosfs
but, in spite of some fanatics here my get worried, i do recommend use
windoze scandisk.
When recovering data from FAT32 i've proven myself what is actually a
better tool.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 15/07/2012 09:56, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
but, in spite of some fanatics here my get worried, i do recommend use
windoze scandisk.
I'd forgotten about scandisk - for modern Windows (XP and newer) you'll want
to use chkdsk ( e.g. 'chkdsk /F C
If you absolutely, positively have to recover the drive, I would
recommend SpinRite 6 http://www.grc.com/intro.htm. Its not free;
again i would recommend standard windows scandisk. such tools as the
other utilities are usually not better.
make sure you have full disk backup anyway
totally in error. SpinRite will attempt to read a damage sector up to
2000 times and through different algorithms determine what is most
man dd
conv=sync,noerror
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Firstly I know this is a bit off topic for this list, please accept my
apologies in advance. I have tried asking in more relevant circles but I have
had no responses at all.
Under pfSense I have openVPN running and Squid, the vpn has rules to route
traffic on ports 119 and 563 via the
VPN
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6582354 Jul 12 22:56 libslatec.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6555122 Jul 12 23:02 libslatec_p.a
#
profile library or -fpic library?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need for the
severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the sites accessible
meaning that we need to request access if we need to go somewhere not
governed by that proxy.
this make sense.
just blocking everything except
I am running a small personal file server. To ensure constant network
access, had to disable the ACPI, hence no power saving at all. The CPU
why you had to disable ACPI. i never ever seen network problems with
ACPI. basically it works, or it doesn't at all.
gets very warm as everything
http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/faq/index.htm
How to bypass corporate proxy?
go away from corporation. A side effect is saving your mental health on
the long run.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD 9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work if you use installer
1) install to first disk
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that company. Ask administrator to unblock if for you as
you need it for work.
Do you do
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict checking stops
booting in 9.0.
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his mind on this as I have asked several times in the
past.
I just told about solution to a problem. Not a workaround.
How you can make your work if your director actively prevent it!?
Basically without getting
Most surprise for me is why no one is interested about what kind of a danger
the ftp protocol can ever be? i. e. skype is much more vicious in comparison to
As in lots of companies where idiots are directors (common case) the
danger is because it is something that doesn't exist. As we all know
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of partitioning scheme, the metadata should not
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
THEN partition it, so partition sizes sums up to gmirror size which is 1
sector less disk size.
then bsdlabel -B
method 2) i make same
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
sorry - possibly i missed something.
both method results in system bootable from both drives and proper
disklabels.
Yes, these are the same methods that can be used with MBR
Does your IT director understand the active/passive distinction? If not
From what he described his director is plain moron. He required him to
block things that HE needs to work, leaving port 80 open so things that
are best in distracting from work (youtube, facebook...) works, as well as
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself. Ie.
fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on certain
ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
as you've said it is not a problem at all
# gmirror list
gmirror: Command 'list' not available.
# gmirror status
gmirror: Command 'status' not available.
gmirror load
It is probably soft-RAID, but I prefer to use it though appropriate
driver instead of classical software RAID configured through OS.
i would recommend otherwise.
That's clear to me.
These hardware raid controllers are not very reliable because they are
indeed not real hardware raid controllers, but software based.
Maybe for desktop usage it's ok/ good enough?
precise what is desktop usage is.
i don't see a reason for doing mirroring for home use.
It
'geom raid load;geom raid list' doesn't give anything. I've tried
'geom load mirror', but 'geom mirror list' is also empty.
what other do you expect with no mirrors created yet?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Bosko Radivojevic wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
what other do you expect with no mirrors created yet?
But mirror (raid10) array is created through LSI MegaRAID BIOS. I'm
if it is RAID10 i assume you
Hi Bosko,
I do not have any experience with these kind of controllers, so I could just
guess.
I have a lot ;) but the only thing i always do is to disable RAID in
BIOS just after receiving new machine. whole experience.
___
fsck does run automatically when a filesystem does not get shut down
cleanly. However, fsck cannot fix all of the problems a filesystem can
experience without risk of loss of data. In those cases, there is no
option but to stop and ask the operator to intervene.
fsck_y_enable=YES in rc.conf
After a power failure at home, my FreeBSD server automatically starts
again but fails to mount my UFS /boot disk because it was not properly
unmounted. Here is my fstab:
$ cat /etc/fstab
# Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass#
/dev/da0s1a /boot-disk ufs
If you're talking about an MS-DOS disk, then yes, it contains
a DOS partition which is formatted. In FreeBSD, we would call
it a slice (slice == DOS primary partition). In this case,
there is no (sub)partitioning, the _slice_ carries the MS-DOS
unless you need windows 98 support partitionless
Notes:
1. SSDs don't necessarily use 4k blocks, some use larger ones. Starting the
All use 4K as it is NTFS default block size and most are sold to be used
with windoze.
first filesystem partition at 1M works for most of the common values.
Alignment of filesystem cannot be better than
Floppy disks aren't partitioned/sliced - they use 'dangerously dedicated'
they use dangerously obsolete mode. nobody use them at all.
disk's empty. If you're on an old system and run 'gpart show da0' and don't
see a partition table it's quite easy to forget to check if da0 itself
contains a
A company I worked with were still distributing files on floppy disks as
recently as 2009.
quite funny :)
They _are_ obsolete, but I suspect plenty of people still
use them.
unless it is a normal way of using it.
That's right - I was thinking of my system where I destroyed all the data on
I have been given a laptop to look at for a friend, the hard disk is close to
death with a SMART error on POST. My initial thought was to just mount it on an
Windows 7 machine and grab what I can from the drive. No joy Windows insists
that the partition is RAW and I need to format it. I can
FreeBSD aurora-clone.Sisis.de 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #2 r235646M:
Thu Jul 5 09:38:00 UTC 2012
r...@aurora-clone.sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
$ df -k
Filesystem 1024-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ada0p274130588 25389436 4281070837%/
Magdeburg, Germany
I have used gpart to partition a USB flash drive into FreeBSD boot partition,
root partition and swap partition.
making swap partition on USB pendrive is at least stupid. if you won't
swap at all - wasted space.
If you will it would be so slow and wear USB pendrive so
Interestingly enough, I searched through the man pages and FreeBSD help
but never came across anything that specifically addressed flash drive.
because there is no need to. For freebsd it is just a storage device.
for FreeBSD only i recommend using bsdlabel, not gpart, for multiOS using
with using the commands provided by Warren, you will be fine
every time. If you practice them regularly, you will remember
them, and if you do so, you'll surely write a script that
after doing
man gpart
he will understand it, so remembering is easy.
am I suffering from too much use of bash and as such shouldnt expect it
to work?
maybe. i actually use bash for script.
banshee# for foo in 1 2 3 ; do echo $foo ; done
for: Command not found.
foo: Undefined variable.
banshee# echo 'for foo in 1 2 3; do echo $foo ; done' bahh.sh
banshee# sh
banshee# for foo in 1 2 3 ; do echo $foo ; done
for: Command not found.
foo: Undefined variable.
banshee# echo 'for foo in 1 2 3; do echo $foo ; done' bahh.sh
banshee# sh bahh.sh
1
2
3
banshee#
echo $SHELL
is it /bin/sh really?
___
I know your question specified gpart, but the easiest way I know of to
put UFS filesystems on flash drives is to use sade(8), incorporating the
the easiest way to put UFS filesystem on flash drives is to ... put
UFS filesystem using newfs command.
You DO NOT NEED any partitioning.
3
banshee#
echo $SHELL
is it /bin/sh really?
Doh, yes that was it. Cant believe I forgot to check. I was running csh
for no good reason.
the reason is that it is default.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
In general they're not distinct in usage from any other type of disk.
The more expensive disks of course support TRIM so you'd want to pass -t to
newfs to enable it.
can you give me an example of pendrive that supports TRIM?
___
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, RW wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:52:50 +0200
Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
hello, world\n
is anybody else seeing this? On a fresh 9-STABLE/amd64 as of July 7,
with all ports compiled from scratch. Qbittorrent (2.9.11) freezes
after about 10 to 20 seconds, reacts to mouse
seems like SSD style controller+USB 3.0 bridge. sizes suggest this.
thanks.
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 08/07/2012 21:51, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
can you give me an example of pendrive that supports TRIM?
LaCie FastKey
(http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/usb-3.0-thumb-drive-flash
You don't. You wipe the FAT32 with fdisk and make a FreeBSD slice on it.
Then you can bsdlabel it with one partition and newfs it. Or you can
repeat 100 times more that you have to make fdisk and bsdlabel. you
don't, and it doesn't make sense
___
file system (as you said without partitions, and I'll take
that literally): You can use tar, the universal file system
that isn't a file system to write data to the USB stick.
which is best in USB pendrive wear and speed point of view.
pendrive's flash translation layers are just awful, only
it without any problem. It _may_ be possible that some
systems like Windows have trouble with this approach,
what trouble? Windows doesn't probably see anything.
anyway i would not risk running windows with FreeBSD containing disk
connected at the same time anyway. it's always risky.
To
Ah the FAQ
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/disks.html#DANGEROUSLY-DEDICATED
I don't think it's dangerous either.
Thanks for your explanations.
While it's far simpler. Anyway i wasn't aware it's called that way as i
don't use installer
___
disks. Maybe you get a
few kb of extra space. Don't do it.
because?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Is there any performance advantage to using a dedicated disk layout
no. it is simplicity adventage, as well as (for SSD and 4K sector disks)
far easier to put partitions aligned.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
While it's far simpler. Anyway i wasn't aware it's called that way as i
don't use installer
As far as I know, the installer dropped dedicated mode some time
ago. So if you intendedly want to use it, you need to bypass the
installer and do the few simple steps using the CLI.
i already do this,
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/faq/09.03.shtml
That is EXTREMELY old advice.
completely irrevelant now.
Why so many people blindly repeat some rules without understanding it.
Even years after that rule no longer matters.
The other example is creating lots of partitions.
environment.
gpart(8) can create MBR slice/partition layouts (and GPT and other partition
schemes). See the man page. There is little reason to use fdisk and
bsdlabel any more.
i use only disklabel, no fdisk at all. i put partition start sector where
i want - no align problems.
I did
I have heard, although I never personally saw it, a GUI for gpart I
heard that there exists one for Linux. Is there any comparable one for
FreeBSD and comparable with KDE?
no idea. If you want it with already installed system, try to compile
linux software.
Anyway i see no reason for such a
What happened to the idea of having a choice ? If you want to keep
living in the 80's with a text based menu, go ahead, I prefer a click
not only me but anyone that wants productivity do live in 80's text based
interfaces or even 60-70's command line interfaces.
These are facts.
And
Perhaps your English phrasing loses something in translation, but your
opinions are always presented in a way that you are correct and the rest of
the world is just wrong.
what you expect - to assume i am wrong and everyone else is right. if i
assume so i don't present such opinion
1. You won't be able to build things from source on that
machine. Consider using packages for installation, or a
second system to build and export (via NFS) the data required.
You can but... too slow
3. For using your applications within the GUI, choose a
good window manager, e. g. FVWM or
automatically start partitions at head boundaries? The reason I ask
is because I am most familiar with sector 64 being the start of a head
boundary as opposed to 63. Is my understanding incorrect?
yes. 63 is normal.
Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated to FreeBSD
Not had tme to pursued it though.
I dont feel like exporting that data public
in case its already gone too far.
You don't have to export it at all.
Can you confirm the data within is the same as say the same
file in /etc or ~/.ssh? If that's really the case, it's a problem.
the real problem
Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated to FreeBSD
Except for swap, right?
wrong.
i said slices (==DOS/Windoze MBR partitions), not disklabel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I think Ryan means partition and not slice?
I would not recommend no slices at all, It's deprecated to use dangerously
dedicated disks
Starting with 9 I don't see slices in mount ouput anymore but still there are
FreeBSD partitions in slices (which is a partitions in dos terms)
Example / is
1083 root 1 210 99444K 11544K select 0 1:28 0.00% Xorg
doesn't take much, only 11.5MB is resident
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
http://pastehtml.com/view/c3kw80dyq.html - Does anyone know if FreeBSD
Can someone post the content of that link.
I only see a stack of This page was viewed but no actual content.
http://pastehtml.com/raw/c3kw80dyq.html
___
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
http://pastehtml.com/view/c3kw80dyq.html - Does anyone know if FreeBSD
Can someone post the content of that link.
I only see a stack of This page was viewed but no actual content.
http://pastehtml.com/raw/c3kw80dyq.html
Same problem
really
pages not loading completely in Firefox 13.0.1,1.
the best solution is to not use that services like twitter, facebook and
just stay away from it so they will not hurt you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Thanks. Can anyone confirm Julian's password stealing script problem.
no idea but probably everything is possible with current style of how web
browsers work.
As for reading anything else than internal firefox data it is not possible
except very basic bug is there.
As for reading anything else than internal firefox data it is not possible
except very basic bug is there.
Yes otherwise all the flash sites would have gathered files from local disks.
true. javascript activity is sandboxed. But within that sandbox there are
million bugs.
i've already seen
and xdm executes ~/.xession. In fact, I have a cascade
xdm file specified in xdm-config
default file Xsession try running ~/.xsession otherwise run other
defaults.
nothing is hardwired.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
the major difference between Hurd and FreeBSD is that FreeBSD actually
work.
http://pastehtml.com/view/c3kw80dyq.html - Does anyone know if FreeBSD core
developers left FreeBSD to work in Google? What will be the future of
FreeBSD and Google?
single man from FreeBSD is listed and other from
I have no ATM interfaces so it shouldn't be loading to my way of thinking.
so check while this module is loading at all, no matter if it's
unsuccessull. FreeBSD is not random place like windows, everything
must have a reason.
___
to work for a lot of other sites. I just tested it for Dailymotion.
Thanks also for the get-flash-videos link which I am glad to study
in detail, including the git port I've now installed.
FreeBSD is a wonderful OS!
absolutely agree but to be clear, both youtube-dl and get-flash-videos
have
link_eif symbol atm_event undefined
KLD if_en.ko: depends on utopia - not available or version mismatch.
I haven't found anything relevant on those through Google. if_en.ko os present
as is utopia.ko. I don't understand why the kernel would try to load if_en as
I don't have any of those
I think MODULES_OVERRIDE is for building only a few modules instead of a large
number of modules?
true. definitely works for me.
Alternatively, how can I prevent ulpt.ko from automatically loading when I
connect a USB printer (HP) that is supposed to work with ugen but not ulpt.
AFAIK postgres is just unix processes nothing special compared to say ..
linux
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Iqbal Aroussi wrote:
Hi dear friends,
I'm trying to setup a master-slave replication with PostgreSQL 9.1 /
Slony-I, this is first time I'm doing it and I'm kind of lost :(
Is there any tutorial
Der, someone over my shoulder highlights the fact that there's bsdiff and
bspatch in the base system for diffing/patching binary files.
great but not for comparing 3GB files with 4GB total RAM .
But your mileage may vary with such large files. Something from ports that's
already been
/wbr
Ariel Burbaickij
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
i have many windows images running over virtualbox. each takes several
gigabytes. i use flat image format.
each differs by very little.
Is there any program that can do diff and keep just
For YouTube, check out the port youtube-dl. For most of everything
else, see http://github.com/monsieurvideo/get-flash-videos for
details.
xpi-unplug firefox plugin is useful too.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
From time when i was still using linux i cannot remember a case that linux
dump utilities actually worked. tar was usable, gnu tar can do SOMEWHAT
like incremental backups too.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Lynn Steven Killingsworth wrote:
Dear FreeBSD -
I have broken my ability to mount my storage
Most probably all filesystems were used with defaults.
MAYBE softupdates, but not even sure for this. Compare this to linux which
is async-like. Comparing with UFS+async would be more fair.
Still - FreeBSD default MAXPHYS in param.h is far too low. i change it to
2048*1024 (default is
when properly configured FreeBSD is quite good.
if that company:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTExNDM
chose FreeBSD in spite of hype-overloaded linux it must be a reason.
As well as it seems they know what they are doing, storage configuration
is IMGO an example how
what i would like to see too is how these systems compare on such test:
- run lots of heavy disk I/O tests, many different in the same time,
including ones doing many writes to different places.
- turn off power while doing this, by unplugging from wall plug.
- compare amount of loss and
That said, I think that the Linux kernel performs better simply due to
wider adoption (larger developer base, wider set of use-cases, etc)
and thus a higher chance of getting performance improvements.
Note that stability matters too.
of course - this is what i pointed out at first.
the
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
It would be very interesting to see the results of stress-testing
i have many windows images running over virtualbox. each takes several
gigabytes. i use flat image format.
each differs by very little.
Is there any program that can do diff and keep just a difference between
each of them instead copy of whole VM disk??
# look like:
# XTerminalName:0 foreign
#
:0 local /usr/local/bin/X -nolisten tcp :0
If there's batter way of doing this, please would someone let me know.
this is the right way if you use xdm.
similar settings are in kdm and gdm possible.
___
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I am amazed anyone still has a working Zip drive!
I have 250MB zipdrive and 100MB disks. all works properly over USB
I did this with OpenOffice 3.x and you have
- 10 times to Inser Picture
- 10 times pic-up the correct picture from the file dialog
- 10 times to move the picture to the correct place in the page
- 10 times to scale the image so that two fit and adjust them a bit
- 4 time Create new page
it took
programming involves many of the classic trade-offs in programming: dynamic
features add flexibility, static features add speed and type checking.
My Note: please keep in mind we are talking about language used for writing
clang, a compiler tool.
So, Objective-C has disadvantage with regard
If it would be truly about removing GPLv3 code that hurts, replacing
libstdc++ would be first thing to do.
I assume you mean like the new libc++?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC%2B%2BStack
yes. this is actually GREAT MOVE!
even if it's slower, object oriented languages are not about speed
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Monday, June 25, 2012 a las 02:52:24PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
simplest case:
1)convert them in batch to postscript.
I did this already with:
for i in *.jpg do ; convert $i $i.ps ; done
this works fin;
2)place it with mpage
Xorg -nolisten tcp to disable at all
to disable wan only use firewall
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Walter Hurry wrote:
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I think Xorg is listening on external addresses:
$ sockstat -46 |grep Xorg
root Xorg 1573 1 tcp6 *:6000*:*
root Xorg
I'm probably being stupid here, and I should have mentioned that I had
already tried 'man Xorg' and 'man Xsession'. I appreciate that the answer
is probably to put '-nolisten tcp' somewhere, but where?
As far as I can see, XDM invokes /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession, which
at Xservers file
How did you get the drive to work with USB? By a hardware adapter? I
i have USB drives. not an adapter
read there is a USB to ide on the market.
I remember specifically that Iomega produced USB Zip drives, though not when
they first produced SCSI, ATAPI and parallel-port Zip drives.
One
i not yet won but soon will :)
Anyway - congratulations for listserver admin for making spam amount THAT
SMALL! IT is less than one per day for such a list - IN SPITE of no need
to subscribe.
Anyway - is requirement to subscribe somehow bad?
___
a) Normally any Domain name registered has to have 2 Nameservers. Some
don't have to. but should.
registry like the one responsible for .ORG requires 2 at least to propagate
the domain. In teh case of .COM that is not a requirement, one nameserver
could work. If for some reason I have 2 of
My criteria for procedures are:
1. They should minimize the need for additional software beyond the base
system as much as reasonably possible. This means not only that I do not
good idea.
3. They should provide for incremental backups.
do backed up laptops use FreeBSD or have another
Hi, since a few of days ago, I noticed my home server turns very slow more than once a
day, so every time I run top to see what's processes are running, I can see
fsck_ufs at the very top, and the hard drive working like mad.
background_fsck=NO in /etc/rc.conf
I've checked my crontab and
101 - 200 of 3224 matches
Mail list logo
