but not to be turned into closed source products.
What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called
forcible, viral open source. I think we can all see the difference. Open
your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball...
Give him a break. His heart is in the right place,
How about leaving politics and getting back to technical grounds?
what is the problem as long as gcc is in the ports tree?
what is a problem as clang is in the ports tree?
the problem is that these compilers are not 100% compatible and soon if
clang will be default it will be not just
Yes, Clang in general produces slower binaries than gcc. Is that in dispute or
something? Or is this just repetition in case we
didn't hear you the first time?
just yesterday i've heard lots of otherwise claim.
Try thinking of the transition as a step back to take many steps forward.
Clang is consistently faster at compiling than GCC and it is very clean and
modular -- not bloated.
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 37025016 12 cze 21:46 /usr/bin/clang
well..
hope you just left the debugging symbols in and statically linked it?
standard FreeBSD built, assumed freebsd build
all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. it
doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and still
same.
Are your ports up to date? Also, did you apply any funky compile time flags?
yes and no.
But i found the answer.
when i use xdm
Are you sure CLANG is the bloated project?
already posted comparision.
your seems like too much propaganda.
I don't say clang is just bad, but i prefer real data over hype.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I don't say clang is just bad, but i prefer real data over hype.
This is the most memorable and impacting set of graphs that I remember. I
haven't followed the data much since.
http://clang.llvm.org/performance-2008-10-31.html
Now imagine having to rebuild projects constantly during your
We already have the latest available with GPLv2, which is very far behind and
it requires GCC codebase experts to make any changes at all. This is
equivalent to letting any random coder make major changes to OpenSSL -- you
simply cannot afford to risk it.
so not doing anything and just spent
pear-shaped.
Clang is a great set of compiler tools. If you are only a user, as you suggest,
as i suggested - i am a user of compiler. i do compile my own programs,
as well as programs from ports.
and i hate just telling something is white while it is at most grey.
Please stop asking for instant gratification; you won't have it no matter how
loud you yell.
gratification Seems like you ask for it.
The Clang decision is far-reaching and gives numerous
advantages to the FreeBSD platform.
for example what?
gratification Seems like you ask for it.
This might be to gratuitous for most on the list, but diversity is almost
reason enough. And I don't mean this is some sort of fashion-way. I
think llvm and clang are interesting and serious projects.
never told otherwise.
i just try to do what
bloated gcc is just funny.
Another way of looking at it is after 25 years of optimization GCC is
unable to beat a new compiler that's had almost none...
none? so why it takes so much time to optimize?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
GPL runs contrary to the nature and intent of the BSD style license.
Free and open software benefits us all.
True. GPL is definitely not FREE software. Freedom doesn't have different
types. Something is free or it is not free.
GPL software is not free as i can not do whatever i want with it.
That's interesting discussion.
I hit some cases where clang produced binaries were
clearly faster than those made with latest gcc. But it's far
from rule.
i did few more test on common unix tools, or my programs and results are
that by average there are just as fast within 1% range.
by
scratch and this resulted with thing 5 times larger,
*YOUR* measurement of sizes was faulty. grin
be more exact.
old bloated gcc is just funny.
You _do_ understand that they could not use -any- of the technology
implementations in GCC, that they had to redevelop everything from
scratch,
none? so why it takes so much time to optimize?
I don't think you understand how compilers work or the concept that new
programming methodologies have been developed over the last 25 years, so this
conversation is going to get stuck in a loop.
Right. You just behave as defender of CLANG
be more exact.
I believe Robert Bonomi (you didn't include attribution for the previous
email, I notice) *was* more exact, in that the rest of his email
explained what he thought of your glossing over the various factors that
might contribute to binary size.
I notice you ignored most of it in
Sorry, my last header wrongly to Mark Felder, could give
the wrong impression. I would like Wojciech Puchar (not Mark F.)
to stop banging on about 'GNU communist licence' etc.
because you don't like facts.
Sorry but i like only facts.
___
freebsd
At 12a Tuesday (6/19) I decided to try installing KDE4 again. When I tried
to change directory to /x11/kde4 the directory did not exist. I decided to
because it does not exist. /usr/ports/x11/kde4 exist.
try to install from my FreeBSD 9 disk at this point. In about 10 sec the
install told
Any server manufacturer who chooses to only support MS products is
going to find they don't get much business from the academic market.
such behaviour is even more stupid today as globally PC market is
shrinking.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Clang is consistently faster at compiling than GCC and it is very clean and
modular -- not bloated.
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 37025016 12 cze 21:46 /usr/bin/clang
well..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
alternatively - use tar.
What I was trying to achieve, which I haven't done yet, was a smallish dump of the
core system. By that I mean system + ports, without distfiles, etc. Then a
separate dump of user data, which is considerably larger. At this point I am thinking I
should do this:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
This would seem to make compiling from source difficult.
simply do not support it. As long as they are users of Fedora (as well as
FreeBSD and other FREE
Has the discussion on why change to clang been made available?
I would like to know the reasoning.
CLANG isn't GNU licenced. Getting rid of communist licence is right, but
still it should not be the prime reason for doing things, as having GNU
licenced gcc doesn't really hurt.
personally
Clearly an update was necessary. Unfortunately, later versions of gcc
have switched to GPLv3, which is a viral license and unacceptable to the
FreeBSD project.
wasn't aware of that.
Therefore clang was chosen from amongst a number of alternatives as the
best replacement. That makes it
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there was
no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to build a
backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump flag on /tmp and /var, so my snapshot is
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Google find many things with javaldx failed.
Is a problem with
can anyone suggest what i'm doing wrong here.
Desired:drop everything from 180.0.0.0 to 180.255.255.255
ipfw -q add 137 deny all from 180.0.0.0/8 to any
nothing wrong. all is fine.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
whats wrong in juz using bsdlabel ?
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 06/04/12 15:25, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
What part of the Handbook? I would suggest using gpart(8), it makes GPT
partitions easy, and nasty old MBR partitions aren't any worse
As nearly as I can tell, I don't have anything pointing at that drive.
Questions:
1. What does the No such file or directory mean from mkdir?
It's a relative dir name, and I'm sitting at a valid dir.
no NTFS driver for FreeBSD is really well done. fusefs based ntfs driver
in my opinion
I updated my ports this morning, built youtube-dl, and after finding
definitely not related to youtube-dl.
some software wouldn't work, rebooted. Now X doesn't start, and when I
tried to start emacs, it seems that libpng, required by emacs, has
vanished.
So my current theory is that I
I reckon as stated at the beginning that either the 180Watt PSU inside
the system isn't enough or the controller is just really poor??
well i got through the same.
changing PSU, forced a seller to replace my motherboard (got NEW, not the
same - checked), checked all cables, even changing
I just offlined the system and took a look at the BIOS. The hard disk
controller was set to ATA NATIVE, I attempted changing to AHCI and the
system failed to boot thereafter.
do you have ahci and ada drivers compiled in?
Booting into my rescue CD of FreeSBIE, with AHCI enabled only showed
But when i call at http://myweb/example.flv i only download this file.
How can I solve this case ?
AddHandler flv-stream .flv ?
Yes there is that line in httpd.conf
But flv doesn't work
do you have
video/x-flv flv
in your mime table.
browser mostly
and do you need this for a non-server? Adobe don't want us (FreeBSD users)
to use their closed-source software. And i respect their will and don't
use it. Which resulted in much easier browsing by the way :)
Some, too many, web sites are difficult or impossible to access without Adobe
Flash.
ppd file are actually human readable, you get a fragment that tell you how
to filter postscript to produce output.
eg. my OfficeJet 8500 filter is based on it.
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Polytropon, you mention ppd files (.ppd or .ppd.gz).
Is this the binary plugin that hplip
2. Replace the vendor installed NTFS with a UFS file system.
$ newfs -U /dev/da1s1
(No, I didn't bother to create BSD partitions)
but why still create msdos partition?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
2. It looses one of the HDDs during intensive read/write operations:
Jun 2 00:55:33 vas kernel: ahcich1: Timeout on slot 4 port 0
Jun 2 00:55:33 vas kernel: ahcich1: is cs 00c0 ss 00f0 rs
00f0 tfd c0 serr cmd c617
Jun 2 00:56:48 vas kernel: ahcich1: Timeout
When I say fast that's mean I already do some benchmarks with iozone. And
do some graphs to see what the performance are.
What I can say is it's go lot faster than H700+ 12 disk 600 15k/min.
i asked if it is faster than properly made UFS/gmirror/gstripe mix on the
same hardware.
And I do
On the other hand, even on a single-disk pool, ZFS stores two copies of all
metadata, so the chances of actually losing a directory block are extremely
remote. On mirrored or RAIDZ pools, you have at least four copies of all
metadata.
i can only wish you to be lucky. sometimes lack of
seems you like to incredibly complicated things.
It just happens that i configured that printer in one office and there is
NO NEED for this windows-style crappy shit from HP.
/usr/ports/print/hplip (make config and disable GUI trash) is enough.
scanning works directly to SMB exported shares
I have another storage server named bd3 that has a RAIDz2 array of 2.5T
drives (11 of them, IIRC) but it is presently powered down for maintenance.
seems you don't need performance at all if you use RAIDz1/2 and ZFS.
unless performance for you means how fast 1GB file are read linearly.
that's all. Work for whole office without trash software installed on
(windoze) workstation or unix server.
___
Your message is worth saving, gives me some new ideas on getting that
recalcitrant printer (HP M1212nf MFP) to work.
if you want mail
I suppose if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
I have FreeBSD 8.2_RELEASE i386 on an old computer, pinched for disk space and
only 256 MB RAM, won't try upgrading in place.
On the new computer, after not being able to boot NetBSD most of the time and
never getting to a graphical interface,
filesystem which resides on the SSD. Is it good, bad or irrelevant for
the SSD ?
Mostly irrelevant, I think. I've been using just ordinary soft updates as
there is bug fixing going on with SU+J. fsck on the SSD is very fast anyway,
so SU+J is needed less. And there's a little less writing
# mount -t ntfs -o ro /dev/da5s1 /mnt
mount_ntfs: /dev/da5s1: Invalid argument
)
your dmesg shows drive is properly detected.
seems like ntfs driver doesn't work OR MBR is't properly handled.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
48TB each, roughly. There would be a couple of units. The pizza
boxes would be used for computational tasks, and nominally would have
8 cores and 96G+ RAM.
Obvious questions are hardware compatibility and stability. I've set
up small FreeBSD 9 machines with ZFS roots and simple mirrors for
I am also in charge of redesigning one of our virtual SAN's to a
FreeBSD ZFS storage system which will run well how many JBOD's can
you fit on the system?? Probably round ~100TB or so.
quite a bit more without buying overpriced things
___
I'm not using as huge a dataset, but I was seeing this behavior as well when
I first set my box up. What was happening was that ZFS was caching *lots* of
writes, and then would dump them all to disk at once, during which time the
computer was completely occupied with the disk I/O.
The
vpn connexion.
I have tried Openvpn and mpd5 (with a pptp and l2pt connexion) and the
max speed (according to various speedtests) is 5 to 6MB.
5-6MB = megabytes per second? megabytes per hour? per year?
be more precise.
Without the vpn I'm having 45-50 MB... My vpn service has servers in
I have recompiled the kernel with device ada and put ahci_load=YES in
/boot/loader.conf.
you don't need ada driver for USB disk. anyway you need it for your SATA
disk to make things fast.
and mounting it works. Obviously, for the disk the device nodes aren't
created...
Is there something
Assuming that filesystem doesn't need offline filesystem check utility
because it never crash is funny.
zfs scrub...???
when starting means crash quickly?
Well.. no.
Certainly with computers that never have hardware faults and assuming ZFS
doesn't have any software bugs you may be right.
level?
It was my impression that ZFS doesn't actually format the disk as
does any filesystem format a disk?
disks are nowadays factory formatted.
filesystem only write data and it's metadata on it.
I really recommend you to get basic knowledge of how (any) filesystem
works.
THEN please
and unbelievable narrow cases, when you don't have or can't
access a backup (which you should have even when using ZFS),
and you _need_ to do some forensic analysis on disks, ZFS
seems to be a worse solution than UFS. On ZFS, you never
can predict where the data will go. Add several disks to
As for ZFS being dangerous, we have a score of drive-years with no loss of
data. The lack of fsck is considered in this intelligently written piece
you are just lucky.
before i would start using anything new in such important part as
filesystem, i do extreme test, ssimulate hardware faults,
what ls -lod empty says?
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 05/25/12 14:38, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
chflags noschg is your friend.
Not in this case.
If you look at the commands attempted, that was already tried (line 282)
Topmost login had to be as root.
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Gary
I am running KDE 4.8 from January on my Linux computer. Now is almost June and
we got KDE 4.8 on FreeBSD too. 5 months testing and it works? No. The modern
OS for the desktop computer doesn;t works. O.K. OS works but installatoon of 5
months testing of KDE doesn;t.
so stop using trendy desktop
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 green_saver.ko /boot/kernel
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 green_saver.ko.symbols /boot/kernel
kldxref /boot/kernel
kldxref: /boot/kernel/kernel: too many sections
kldxref: error while reading /boot/kernel/kernel: Bad address
su:/usr/src$
I tried to remove
Would it be stupid idea to have publicly available, mountable (nfs)
partition, with full port tree(s)? I think it would be good for
systems with low storage space. I know hd space is cheap, but I run
over and over to this problem.
read only or read write?
public read write isn't smart.
I
This was good to know.
as others told there is smarter way to do this
set WRKDIRPREFIX to somewhere else.
no.
Is there such environment variables that can be pointed to writeable partition?
That sources download and compiles on different
partition. Then there is no bandwidth problem
I'm searching for a cloud software :-)
look at clouds.
More precisely we would like to offer to our students and professors
a kind of private cloud to access/manipulate their personnal data
from almost anywhere and with almost any devices ...
( Personnal PC, Mac, smartphones and tablets
i think most people talking about cloud solutions have really CLOUDY
idea of what they want.
Far too much marketing, far too little (if any) description of the needs.
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 25/05/2012 10:11, Frank Bonnet wrote:
a kind of private cloud
Uh... Isn't
Does anyone know milter software (or maybe anything else) to add to
sendmail that can rewrite outgoing mail and add HTML footer automatically?
Please do not tell me about how stupid HTML mail is at all - i know it, it
is not my idea.
thanks
___
the antithesis of 'cloud'? I would never invest a dime or a single bit
of data to a cloud venture.
how one can invest of something that isn't even defined clearly.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
With apologies to Joni Mitchell:
I've looked at clouds from both sides now,
From up and down, and still somehow,
It's cloud illusions I recall,
I really don't know clouds, at all.
Well, someone had to say it. :-) It summarises the marketing hype perfectly.
fashion is quite often deciding
I think you'll find Postfix to be much more modern and easy to work
with for that kind of message rewriting.
you are actually wrong in that statement. In spite of hype that
postscript started with, i am still using sendmail because it is actually
easiest if you learn it.
But what you're
Well ... My goal was NOT to start a flame war around the cloud term ...
you didn't. You just started a flame of requests to be more precise and go
down from the clouds to earth.
So finally write down what you need, and we most probably can help you.
But... if you want to just sell some
Well ... in short I need to let our users ( students + profs ) access and
share their data ( living in their UNIX home directories )
The access must be easy and possible from as much devices as possible.
Am I clear enough ? ( sorry English is not my native language ...)
yes NOW IT IS CLEAR.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-nfs.html
30.3 Network File System (NFS)
Use NFS :
Define each computer as both Server to serve to other users(s) and
Client .to see the other server(s) .
If there are Windows computers , you may also use SAMBA :
The access must be easy and possible from as much devices as possible.
Am I clear enough ? ( sorry English is not my native language ...)
Well, this should reduce the cloud to an sftp-server or - if their stuff
isn't security sensitive to an ftp-server.
depends on connectivity. If you just
As he said in his post, NFS is the first place to start. It's available on
FreeBSD, Linux, Mac OS, other Unix derived systems, and Windows 7. The one
thing to be careful of is that it works best when you have all home
directories on central servers and all access is on client machines. It is
Am I clear enough ? ( sorry English is not my native language ...)
Access is still a bit vague, but security/openvpn may be part of the
answer: http://openvpn.net/index.php/open-source.html
for windows users i would recommend mpd - it provides VPN in windows
standard, just use windows add
broken device or motherboard, or conflict. check if irq is not shared.
re0 are not great network cards but really not that bad. something is
badly broken with hardware
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Eugen Konkov wrote:
How to look what re0 is doing?? And how to debug that?
last pid: 74164; load
chflags noschg is your friend.
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
something I'm not seeing
I've got a disk previously used as a sys disk I'm trying to clean up.
What's the key to removing /var/empty?
280 /hd1/var#sysctl kern.securelevel
kern.securelevel: -1
281 /hd1/var#ls -l
total 4
I guess it's pretty subjective, which is how I should have originally
prefaced my statement. I used sendmail for a long time, and always
hated working with m4 or direct sendmail configuration files.
well i just used README file and sometimes google.
For me,
Postfix is so much easier, but to
I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible
network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes
with most PC's?
i think making list of incompatible network cards would be far easier.
since a very long time i just never checked as everything
Am I the only one of few people who needs to run PHP scripts on FreeBSD machine
that were encoded with Zend Guard technology? trying to run linux version of
probably not, no idea EXACTLY what zend guard is but i've seen other such
standards of encoding==obfuscating PHP sources. I don't provide
I need a sort of file permission template.
Under some particular directory (like ~/secret), I need all those
files (including newly creating one) mode 700.
Is there any template-trick? Or chmod -R 700 every time?
umask when creating files there.
___
Thanks. But I need specific directory only.
umask way seems to set mode not only under ~/secret but other
directories like ~/public.
Is there any elegant way?
elegant way is just to chmod 700 ~/secret and do not do anything more, as
files under ~/secret are already inaccessible too for others
After a reinstall of winxp, yes I know but the games.
I have a fat32 slice/partition/postcard whatever it's called.
Mocking me with:
testbox# fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4
** /dev/ad4
Invalid signature in fsinfo block
Fix? yes
fsck: /dev/ad4: Floating point exception: 8
testbox#
why ad4 not
thanks for help. found it non-FreeBSD specific. just this model is not
supported by available software.
Thanks again
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Robert Huff wrote:
Wojciech Puchar writes:
/usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd ?
? - so what to give as device? /dev/ugen1.3?
set
UPSCABLE usb
UPSTYPE
I am not sure how that plays in it. I am definitely not a make hacker.
Anyway, is there a good tinker to get past this
or do I have to wait until something gets updated in the port?
8.2 version should work just fine as 8.3 version.
Some simple fixing of makefiles/other files or even symlinks
i would rather look at software that uses tun interfaces instead of
FreeBSD which seems to support more than 128 tuns out of the box:
this:
# x=1;while [ $x -lt 2000 ];do ifconfig tun$x create;x=$[x+1];done
worked fine. ifconfig shows 2000 tun interfaces
# x=1;while [ $x -lt 2000 ];do
Sorry for OT it is funny that such cheat-companies are so common in
Poland, advertise a lot not even understanding what they are talking
about.
The funny part is that potential clients believe in this trash instead of
simply use google and type webpage promotion, google rank etc..
etc..
seems like it is very badly made USB interface, all class data is empty,
ugen1.3: ECO Pro Series UPS EVER at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps)
pwr=ON
bLength = 0x0012
bDescriptorType = 0x0001
bcdUSB = 0x0101
bDeviceClass = 0x
bDeviceSubClass = 0x
bDeviceProtocol =
/dev/ugen1.3 as port - driver fails.
from what i found in linux groups it should work as USB HID device. but
uhid doesn't attach.
On 05/14/2012 14:06, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
seems like it is very badly made USB interface, all class data is empty,
ugen1.3: ECO Pro Series UPS EVER
I would like to build FreeBSD to install in two places: regular hard drive and
also on a USB stick, probably 8 GB.
USB stick install would be for backup, in case something goes awry with a later
update, then I have something to fall back on; could also install tools such as
gdisk to use on
This is the command I'm using:
%sudo avrdude -F -v -v -v -v -c arduino -p ATMEGA328P -P /dev/cuaU0 -U
flash:w:flash.hex
This is what I use for Duemilanove
sudo avrdude -V -F -c stk500v1 -p m168 -b 19200 -P /dev/cuaU0 -U
flash:w:flash.hex (Arduino)
maybe stupid question but why do you use
UPSCABLE usb
UPSTYPE usb
My BackUPS RS 500 works fine using those and a empty DEVICE field.
how your UPS shows in dmesg?
It is possible this is a new/redesigned model that Apcupsd does
not handle correctly. (APC is famous for not having a consistant
interface, even model
by possibly someone can help.
I want to use FreeBSD as timeshared server with some amount of X terminal
(basically for free with old computers, netboot, running just Xorg -query
and xdm on server).
There is usable software that have the commonly required uselessness
(called desktop
But yet - what graphical mail program can you recommend that have such
simple basic functionality of local mail support in Maildir format?
Did you try googling for 'X mail client FreeBSD'? A mere 14+ million hits.
true. and none usable. all outdated etc. did YOU checked them before
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox.
is it just me or is firefox really broken currently?
or maybe it finally got market as such ;)
As well as many other browsers.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person. I am the only administrator,
the only one with root access. The jails were effectively moved to the
/usr/local/etc/apache22 of the single that survived at the top level.
I'm thinking something between mount, EzJail, the journal and the way
MySQL created a
/usr/ports/net/rsync
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Frank Staals wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I'm looking for a way to synchronise two jails. More specifically, I
would like to keep/maintain an exact copy of a given jail. As an
example: Suppose I build a jail A on some system (in my particular case
build with
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
IMHO no. OSX is somehow-microkernel based, they did take things from
FreeBSD but not this IMHO.
anyway - who cares
Something is deeply broken in OS X memory management
most importantly networking but certainly not memory subsystem.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:31 AM, jb wrote:
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
The simple answer is no. A more complex answer:
% grep -ri
2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by the OS when
needed for new programs. In practice, I?ve found that this isn?t the case, and
my system slows to a crawl and starts paging out to disk when free
If you really are having a problem with FreeBSD you are going to have to do
a lot better than this in terms of providing some data points which define
the problem. I am in agreement with Adam here: either you can work the
problem or you can troll. I don't see any indication yet of any real
is relatively new. My guess is that if there is a problem it's ZFS
specific. If it were a more general problem I think we'd see a lot more
complaints, whereas ZFS already has a reputation for needing lots of
memory.
you may precisely set up a limits of memory that ZFS would use at most. or
just
something. I unmounted the drive and ran fsck and reported no
problems. df shows the data being use so where is the data??
your data is here as df shown usage and fsck see no errors. most probably
root directory of that volume got corrupted and subdirs were found and put
in lost+found
301 - 400 of 3224 matches
Mail list logo
