Hi,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 12:26:03 Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
Hi,
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
There may have been a historic reason, but now it is philosophical -
Hi,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 13:06:57 Robert Bonomi wrote:
Erich Dollansky er...@alogreentechnologies.com wrote:
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system, the machine has
Erich Dollansky er...@alogreentechnologies.com wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 13:06:57 Robert Bonomi wrote:
Erich Dollansky er...@alogreentechnologies.com wrote:
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
when I got my hands
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:53:10 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
The RK05 had one removable platter in a plastic housing.
Please compare the images of the drive and the media.
Does it look similar?
Removable platters types EC 5269 in plastic cartridge:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:39:00AM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
AHA. probably an 'RL-05', cousin to the better known RK-05
I had a memory fault -- the RLs were the RL-01 and RL-02.
14 media, in a 'cartridge'. I -think- it was an 'SMD' interface
14 could be true as it
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:53:10 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
The RK05 had one removable platter in a plastic housing.
Please compare the images of the drive and the media.
Does it look similar?
Removable platters types EC 5269 in plastic cartridge:
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 13:05:49 Lars Eighner wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Daniel Staal wrote:
I've never seen anything listing the main reasons for having /home under /usr
though. I figure there must be a decent reason why. Would anyone
Hi,
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
There may have been a historic reason, but now it is philosophical - trying
when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system, the machine has had
several 5MB hard disks.
I assume
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
Hi,
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
There may have been a historic reason, but now it is philosophical -
trying
when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system,
Erich Dollansky er...@alogreentechnologies.com wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
There may have been a historic reason, but now it is philosophical -
trying
when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system,
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
Hi,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 12:26:03 Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
Hi,
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
There
On 20 February 2012, at 22:20, Chip Camden wrote:
I believe the 5MB removable were RL01. They also had a 10MB removable
RL02, which we used for software distribution. We resold them to our
customers at $170 each.
yes, this sound familiar. The RL02 came later.
I think that tapes were
Hi,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 13:20:11 Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 12:26:03 Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12
I vote for multiple partitions with user specified names (or at least
be able to change /home mount point to something else) allocated
space.
in message 4f3f1817.7030...@herveybayaustralia.com.au,
wrote Da Rock thusly...
On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:16:39 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to
have said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the old style default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:49 -0600 (CST), Lars Eighner wrote:
It seems to me that partition and mount point are being confused to a
degree. There is no reason what is mounted at /usr/home cannot be a
separate partition as well as if it were mounted at root.
I thought of this fact as such an
On 02/18/12 20:22, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:49 -0600 (CST), Lars Eighner wrote:
It seems to me that partition and mount point are being confused to a
degree. There is no reason what is mounted at /usr/home cannot be a
separate partition as well as if it were mounted at root.
On 18/02/2012 10:44, Da Rock wrote:
I have yet to try ZFS (lack of resources really), but when I can I will
setup a SAN and it will be interesting to see how this works and I
probably will use a single partition. But for the general filesystem I
doubt a single partition will cut it (I could be
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:44:13 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
BTW I was intending to put across the concept of /usr being user related
- anything a user may need or use; as opposed to / for the system
related stuff that keeps it running. Maybe I wasn't as clear as I had
thought... :)
There's lots of
On 02/18/12 21:23, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 18/02/2012 10:44, Da Rock wrote:
I have yet to try ZFS (lack of resources really), but when I can I will
setup a SAN and it will be interesting to see how this works and I
probably will use a single partition. But for the general filesystem I
doubt a
On 02/18/12 21:39, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:44:13 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
BTW I was intending to put across the concept of /usr being user related
- anything a user may need or use; as opposed to / for the system
related stuff that keeps it running. Maybe I wasn't as clear as I
Hi,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 13:05:49 Lars Eighner wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Daniel Staal wrote:
I've never seen anything listing the main reasons for having /home under
/usr
though. I figure there must be a decent reason why. Would anyone care to
enlighten me? What are the
On 18/02/2012 11:36, Da Rock wrote:
If I may, can I ask a quick question: My main misgivings about ZFS have
been speed, ram use, and up till about a year ago or so relative 'youth'
(at least on FreeBSD). What would be the minimum ram you would use for a
high disk use? And what would be
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:16:34PM -0500, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the old style default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated
man hier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.comwrote:
man hier
man 7 hier makes no mention of /home or /usr/home at all ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
--As of February 18, 2012 2:46:32 PM -0800, Michael Sierchio is alleged to
have said:
man hier
--As for the rest, it is mine.
...Doesn't mention /home (or /usr/home) once. ;)
Pointing people to the docs which answers their question is good. But
please make sure it actually answers their
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
--As of February 18, 2012 2:46:32 PM -0800, Michael Sierchio is alleged to
have said:
man hier
True, but /usr/... was a typical place to find users' home
directories, since /usr is mounted when the system goes to
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the old style default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
/
swap
/tmp
/var
On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to
have said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the old style default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
/
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the old style default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
31 matches
Mail list logo
