Matthew Seaman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Alex Zbyslaw wrote
Setuid/gid bits on shell scripts aren't considered safe, however and may
even be disabled.
THERE IS NO REASON FOR THIS, JUST USE THE FILE-SYSTEM TO PROTECT THE
FILES (MAKE THEM NOT
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Alex Zbyslaw wrote
SNIP
Setuid/gid bits on shell scripts aren't considered safe, however and may
even be disabled.
THERE IS NO REASON FOR THIS, JUST USE THE FILE-SYSTEM TO PROTECT THE FILES
(MAKE THEM NOT WRITEABLE). Scripts are no more susceptible to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Alex Zbyslaw wrote
SNIP
Setuid/gid bits on shell scripts aren't considered safe, however and may
even be disabled.
THERE IS NO REASON FOR THIS, JUST USE THE FILE-SYSTEM TO
On Sunday 10 February 2008 11:13, Matthew Seaman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Alex Zbyslaw wrote
SNIP
Setuid/gid bits on shell scripts aren't considered safe, however and may
even be disabled.
THERE IS NO REASON FOR THIS, JUST USE THE
Hello,
I have looked at my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and realized that the symlink
I put there has the root as owner. It all works but I would rather use
a non-root user for to run that script.
$ ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d/
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel40 May 9 2007 sender.sh -
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have looked at my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and realized that the symlink
I put there has the root as owner. It all works but I would rather use
a non-root user for to run that script.
$ ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d/
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel40 May
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I have looked at my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and realized that the symlink
I put there has the root as owner. It all works but I would rather use
a non-root user for to run that script.
$ ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d/
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel40 May 9 2007
Hello Alex,
2008/2/6, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I have looked at my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and realized that the symlink
I put there has the root as owner. It all works but I would rather use
a non-root user for to run that script.
$ ls -l
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
I have looked at my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and realized that the symlink
I put there has the root as owner. It all works but I would rather use
a non-root user for to run that script.
$ ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d/
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel40 May 9 2007 sender.sh -
2008/2/6, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
I have looked at my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ and realized that the symlink
I put there has the root as owner. It all works but I would rather use
a non-root user for to run that script.
$ ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d/
lrwxr-xr-x
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Thank you. I realized this was the case before I wrote previous
message. The thing is the real file is owned by user api. However,
when the application is started following a reboot, its logs are
created by user root, whereas when I start it by hand as user api, its
logs
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
I have never really understood the thing about setuids, gid and etc. :)
I am not planning a restart so won't try it but I am pretty sure that
logs are created by root unless the api is started manually. No big
deal really but thanks for all the suggestions!
It's very
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:09:50 +
Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally much prefer scripts in rc.d because it's much easier to
migrate than crontabs, and if I never use a crontab I always know
where to look.
It looks to me like you shouldn't be starting the demon as user api
13 matches
Mail list logo
