/usr/local/etc/rc.d startup scripts

2007-03-07 Thread Don O'Neil
Are there any special naming requirements for scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d for 6.1? Someone is telling me they need to have a .sh suffix to startup correctly, but in past versions of FreeBSD anything you put in there would run as long as it was executable. Just trying to confirm the correct

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d startup scripts

2007-03-07 Thread Josh Carroll
Someone is telling me they need to have a .sh suffix to startup correctly, but in past versions of FreeBSD anything you put in there would run as long as it was executable. It need not have an sh extension. The MySQL port, for example, installs /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server, which works

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d startup scripts

2007-03-07 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 07), Don O'Neil said: Are there any special naming requirements for scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d for 6.1? Someone is telling me they need to have a .sh suffix to startup correctly, but in past versions of FreeBSD anything you put in there would run as long as it

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d startup scripts

2007-03-07 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:58:22AM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote: Are there any special naming requirements for scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d for 6.1? Someone is telling me they need to have a .sh suffix to startup correctly, but in past versions of FreeBSD anything you put in there would run as

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d startup scripts

2007-03-07 Thread RW
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:40:09 -0600 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the last episode (Mar 07), Don O'Neil said: Are there any special naming requirements for scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d for 6.1? Someone is telling me they need to have a .sh suffix to startup correctly, but in