Chris Rees wrote:
Although I think it's not a big deal, as long as your id_?sa has
permissions 600 like mine, or even 400.
Chris
The man page for ssh(1) provides a lot of detail about the sensitivity
of the various files related to ssh. To quote it regarding a few of them:
~/.ssh/
Looking at my ~/.ssh directory, I see the following permissions:
-rw-r--r--
Which I understand to be equivalent to 644.
I read here http://sial.org/howto/openssh/publickey-auth/ that
~/.ssh ought to have permissions 700.
Which is preferable, and why?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:06:03AM -0400, Daniel Underwood wrote:
Looking at my ~/.ssh directory, I see the following permissions:
-rw-r--r--
Which I understand to be equivalent to 644.
I read here http://sial.org/howto/openssh/publickey-auth/ that
~/.ssh ought to have permissions 700.
Thanks. Might as well set to 700 then.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 23 jun 2009, at 16:06, Daniel Underwood djuatde...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at my ~/.ssh directory, I see the following permissions:
-rw-r--r--
Which I understand to be equivalent to 644.
I read here http://sial.org/howto/openssh/publickey-auth/ that
~/.ssh ought to have permissions
2009/6/23 Peter Boosten pe...@boosten.org:
On 23 jun 2009, at 16:06, Daniel Underwood djuatde...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at my ~/.ssh directory, I see the following permissions:
-rw-r--r--
Which I understand to be equivalent to 644.
I read here
