5.1 on a 386

2003-06-12 Thread John Nielsen
Hi folks- I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX. I'm mostly doing it as a learning exercise (or perhaps because I'm a masochist), but the machine may be used as a firewall at some point. I have the OS installed with a custom kernel, and things are actually going quite well. There

Re: 5.1 on a 386

2003-06-12 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:25 PM Subject: 5.1 on a 386 Hi folks- I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX. I'm mostly doing it as a learning exercise (or perhaps because I'm a masochist), but the machine may be used as a firewall at some point. I have the OS

Re: 5.1 on a 386

2003-06-12 Thread Bill Moran
not powerful enough to be worthwhile, but it doesn't say specifically why. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: John Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:25 PM Subject: 5.1 on a 386 Hi folks- I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX. I'm

Re: 5.1 on a 386

2003-06-12 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: I could be wrong, but I thought that they finally gave up on 386 support and now the base minimum is 486. It could very well be that you can't compile the system for a 386 without significant modification. No, it's just that a 386 isn't supported in the base

Re: 5.1 on a 386

2003-06-12 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
wonder how much. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: John Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:42 PM Subject: Re: 5.1 on a 386 Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: I could

Re: 5.1 on a 386

2003-06-12 Thread John Nielsen
On Thursday 12 June 2003 13:58, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If this is the case, then the hardware notes need updated, I quote: All Intel processors beginning with the 80386 are supported, including the 80386, ... ... and ...

Re: 5.1 on a 386

2003-06-12 Thread Fernando Gleiser
On 12 Jun 2003, Lowell Gilbert wrote: No, the 386SX is a problem because it has no floating point registers (or any other floating point support, for that matter). The 386DX (with the floating point support onboard) is supported just fine, as I understand it. No. That's the diference

Re: 5.1 on a 386

2003-06-12 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Fernando Gleiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 12 Jun 2003, Lowell Gilbert wrote: No, the 386SX is a problem because it has no floating point registers (or any other floating point support, for that matter). The 386DX (with the floating point support onboard) is supported just fine, as