Re: 6.1 current instabilty on Sun Ultra 40's

2006-08-31 Thread stan
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:44:28PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:01:07 -0400 stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On that disk is a world, built from last weekends cvsup. I was able to reproduce it's instability to build a generic kernel. It fails with a signal (I

6.1 current instabilty on Sun Ultra 40's

2006-08-30 Thread stan
I can't get 6.1 to even compile a new kernel on 2 different Sun Ultra 40's Anyone have nay reason that it should not work on these machines? Both are dul processor BTW, should I try the non MP kernel? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)

Re: 6.1 current instabilty on Sun Ultra 40's

2006-08-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:02:28 -0400 stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't get 6.1 to even compile a new kernel on 2 different Sun Ultra 40's Anyone have nay reason that it should not work on these machines? Stan, as a general rule, telling the list what you did and the (exact) error / problems

Re: 6.1 current instabilty on Sun Ultra 40's

2006-08-30 Thread stan
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:39:35PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:02:28 -0400 stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't get 6.1 to even compile a new kernel on 2 different Sun Ultra 40's Anyone have nay reason that it should not work on these machines? Stan, as a

Re: 6.1 current instabilty on Sun Ultra 40's

2006-08-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:01:07 -0400 stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On that disk is a world, built from last weekends cvsup. I was able to reproduce it's instability to build a generic kernel. It fails with a signal (I believe) 11, fair enough :) btw, from past experience, sig_fault 11 usually